Literature DB >> 18808252

Age differences in proactive interference, working memory, and abstract reasoning.

Lisa Emery1, Sandra Hale, Joel Myerson.   

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that older adults are especially susceptible to proactive interference (PI) and that this may contribute to age differences in working memory performance. In young adults, individual differences in PI affect both working memory and reasoning ability, but the relations between PI, working memory, and reasoning in older adults have not been examined. In the current study, young, old, and very old adults performed a modified operation span task that induced several cycles of PI buildup and release as well as two tests of abstract reasoning ability. Age differences in working memory scores increased as PI built up, consistent with the hypothesis that older adults are more susceptible to PI, but both young and older adults showed complete release from PI. Young adults' reasoning ability was best predicted by working memory performance under high PI conditions, replicating M. Bunting (2006). In contrast, older adults' reasoning ability was best predicted by their working memory performance under low PI conditions, thereby raising questions regarding the general role of susceptibility to PI in differences in higher cognitive function among older adults. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18808252      PMCID: PMC2556888          DOI: 10.1037/a0012577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  16 in total

1.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach.

Authors:  Randall W Engle; Stephen W Tuholski; James E Laughlin; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-09

2.  The role of interference in memory span.

Authors:  C P May; L Hasher; M J Kane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

3.  Working memory span and the role of proactive interference.

Authors:  C Lustig; C P May; L Hasher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-06

4.  Physiological reactivity to cognitive stressors: variations by age and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Shevaun D Neupert; Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Margie E Lachman
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  2006

5.  Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory.

Authors:  Michael Bunting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Individual differences in executive processing predict susceptibility to interference in verbal working memory.

Authors:  Trey Hedden; Carolyn Yoon
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Facts and fiction about memory aging: a quantitative integration of research findings.

Authors:  P Verhaeghen; A Marcoen; L Goossens
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1993-07

8.  Don't worry, be happy? Neuroticism, trait-consistent affect regulation, and performance.

Authors:  Maya Tamir
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-09

9.  Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment.

Authors:  R Katzman; T Brown; P Fuld; A Peck; R Schechter; H Schimmel
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Latent change models of adult cognition: are changes in processing speed and working memory associated with changes in episodic memory?

Authors:  Christopher Hertzog; Roger A Dixon; David F Hultsch; Stuart W S MacDonald
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-12
View more
  18 in total

1.  S 18986 reverses spatial working memory impairments in aged mice: comparison with memantine.

Authors:  Matthias Vandesquille; Ali Krazem; Caroline Louis; Pierre Lestage; Daniel Béracochéa
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Aging enhances cognitive biases to friends but not the self.

Authors:  Jie Sui; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  When does a good working memory counteract proactive interference? Surprising evidence from a probe recognition task.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; J Scott Saults
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-03-19

4.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  The role of proactive interference in working memory training and transfer.

Authors:  Thomas S Redick; Elizabeth A Wiemers; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-05

7.  The hypercorrection effect in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Teal S Eich; Yaakov Stern; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2012-12-14

8.  Impact of aging on the dynamics of memory retrieval: A time-course analysis.

Authors:  Ilke Oztekin; Nur Zeynep Güngör; David Badre
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  The role of long-term memory in a test of visual working memory: Proactive facilitation but no proactive interference.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Edward Awh; David W Sutterer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Storage and processing in working memory: Assessing dual-task performance and task prioritization across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Agnieszka J Jaroslawska; Jason M Doherty; Clément Belletier; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Nelson Cowan; Valérie Camos; Pierre Barrouillet; Robert H Logie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.