Literature DB >> 11409099

Working memory span and the role of proactive interference.

C Lustig1, C P May, L Hasher.   

Abstract

The authors investigated the possibility that working memory span tasks are influenced by interference and that interference contributes to the correlation between span and other measures. Younger and older adults received the span task either in the standard format or one designed to reduce the impact of interference with no impact on capacity demands. Participants then read and recalled a short prose passage. Reducing the amount of interference in the span task raised span scores, replicating previous results (C. P. May, L. Hasher, & M. J. Kane, 1999). The same interference-reducing manipulations that raised span substantially altered the relation between span and prose recall. These results suggest that span is influenced by interference, that age differences in span may be due to differences in the ability to overcome interference rather than to differences in capacity, and that interference plays an important role in the relation between span and other tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11409099     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  94 in total

1.  Working memory span: the effect of prior learning.

Authors:  Cindy Lustig; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2002

2.  The effects of age on the strategic use of pitch accents in memory for discourse: a processing-resource account.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Duane G Watson; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-05-30

3.  The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: Evidence for efficiency and reserve.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Xuefei Gao; Soo Rim Noh; Carolyn J Anderson; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2011-12-08

4.  Control of working memory content in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Britta Hahn; Andrew Hollingworth; Benjamin M Robinson; Samuel T Kaiser; Carly J Leonard; Valerie M Beck; Emily S Kappenman; Steven J Luck; James M Gold
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Fractionating the neural substrate of cognitive control processes.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Dreher; Karen Faith Berman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Age, time of testing, and proactive interference.

Authors:  Lynn Hasher; Christie Chung; Cynthia P May; Natalie Foong
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2002-09

Review 7.  Sequential memory: a developmental perspective on its relation to frontal lobe functioning.

Authors:  Cassandra Burns Romine; Cecil R Reynolds
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  Human neuroscience and the aging mind: a new look at old problems.

Authors:  Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Denise C Park
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  The role of working memory in the metaphor interference effect.

Authors:  Russell S Pierce; Rick Maclaren; Dan L Chiappe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

10.  The influence of complex working memory span task administration methods on prediction of higher level cognition and metacognitive control of response times.

Authors:  David P McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.