Literature DB >> 27685018

The role of long-term memory in a test of visual working memory: Proactive facilitation but no proactive interference.

Klaus Oberauer1, Edward Awh2, David W Sutterer2.   

Abstract

We report 4 experiments examining whether associations in visual working memory are subject to proactive interference from long-term memory (LTM). Following a long-term learning phase in which participants learned the colors of 120 unique objects, a working memory (WM) test was administered in which participants recalled the precise colors of 3 concrete objects in an array. Each array in the WM test consisted of 1 old (previously learned) object with a new color (old-mismatch), 1 old object with its old color (old-match), and 1 new object. Experiments 1 to 3 showed that WM performance was better in the old-match condition than in the new condition, reflecting a beneficial contribution from LTM. In the old-mismatch condition, participants sometimes reported colors associated with the relevant shape in LTM, but the probability of successful recall was equivalent to that in the new condition. Thus, information from LTM only intruded in the absence of reportable information in WM. Experiment 4 tested for, and failed to find, proactive interference from the preceding trial in the WM test: Performance in the old-mismatch condition, presenting an object from the preceding trial with a new color, was equal to performance with new objects. Experiment 5 showed that long-term memory for object-color associations is subject to proactive interference. We conclude that the exchange of information between LTM and WM appears to be controlled by a gating mechanism that protects the contents of WM from proactive interference but admits LTM information when it is useful. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27685018      PMCID: PMC5209290          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  50 in total

1.  Temporal clustering and sequencing in short-term memory and episodic memory.

Authors:  Simon Farrell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory.

Authors:  Michael Bunting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Chunk limits and length limits in immediate recall: a reconciliation.

Authors:  Zhijian Chen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Serial-position effects for items and relations in short-term memory.

Authors:  Tim Jones; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-09-27

5.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Stimulus-specific variability in color working memory with delayed estimation.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Maria Olkkonen; Sarah R Allred; Colin Wilson; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference.

Authors:  G Tehan; M S Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-03

8.  Visual short-term memory is not improved by training.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

9.  Retrieval practice enhances the accessibility but not the quality of memory.

Authors:  David W Sutterer; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

10.  Time-based loss in visual short-term memory is from trace decay, not temporal distinctiveness.

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Lauren R Spiegel; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  11 in total

1.  Short-term memory based on activated long-term memory: A review in response to Norris (2017).

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Visual working memory load does not eliminate visuomotor repetition effects.

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Matthew D Hilchey; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Meaningful stimuli inflate the role of proactive interference in visual working memory.

Authors:  Roy Shoval; Tal Makovski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  Expectation-based blindness: Predictions about object categories gate awareness of focally attended objects.

Authors:  Alon Zivony; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-05-17

5.  Memory and Proactive Interference for spatially distributed items.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-04

6.  The visual nonverbal memory trace is fragile when actively maintained, but endures passively for tens of seconds.

Authors:  Denis McKeown; Tom Mercer; Kinga Bugajska; Paul Duffy; Emma Barker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

7.  Long-term memory guides resource allocation in working memory.

Authors:  Allison L Bruning; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Memory Traces Diminished by Exercise Affect New Learning as Proactive Facilitation.

Authors:  Cuicui Li; Rena Li; Chenglin Zhou
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  The influence of long-term memory on working memory: Age-differences in proactive facilitation and interference.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Bradley R Buchsbaum; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-28

10.  Perceptual stimuli with novel bindings interfere with visual working memory.

Authors:  Peter Shepherdson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.