Literature DB >> 18807148

Attitude of the Italian general population towards prevention and screening of the most common tumors, with special emphasis on colorectal malignancies.

Federica Domati1, Estratios Travlos, Claudia Cirilli, Giuseppina Rossi, Piero Benatti, Massimiliano Marino, Giovanni Ponti, Maria Vandelli, Simone Valmori, Amal Oursana, Annalisa Pezzi, Maurizio Ponz de Leon.   

Abstract

Screening and early diagnosis of cancer represent relatively recent tools in the long-lasting battle against tumors. If the American public opinion manifests its enthusiasm towards screening, the attitude of European is less well known. The purpose of the present study was to assess the level of knowledge and awareness of cancer screening (with particular emphasis on colorectal neoplasms) among middle-aged individuals. The study group consisted of 945 healthy individuals (489 men, 456 women, average age 57 +/- 12.4 years) who were asked to answer a series of questions about cancer screening and surveillance through a questionnaire presented by trained residents. Each interview lasted 20-30 min. Middle-aged Italians of both sexes seem to be aware of the fact that cancer is a frequent disease; moreover, many of the interviewed subjects believe almost all neoplasms are incurable. Diet, style of life, other environmental factors and familial factors are fully appreciated as relevant risk factors. The exact meaning of prevention was clear to less than half of the subjects. When various cancer sites were analyzed, the existence of preventive measures was well known for breast, cervical and prostate tumors, but their role was less clear for colorectal cancer. Only a fraction of the interviewed individuals were willing to undergo screening; the main reasons for refusal were lack of usefulness and fear of results. Among various tests, ultrasound and endoscopy were usually carried out in the presence of symptoms. Finally, multivariate analysis showed that the two factors significantly associated with the decision to undergo screening procedures were increasing age and level of education. The results of the study suggest that middle-aged Italian individuals, predominantly from Northern regions, have a correct perception of some aspects (frequency, risk factors) of cancer biology, whereas the knowledge of other aspects (outcome, prevention) remains poor or approximate. It follows that one of the main objectives of the Political Class should be to obtain a better education of overage individuals about cancer and the many problems related to this common disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18807148     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-008-0184-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  35 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Current approaches to cervical-cancer screening.

Authors:  G F Sawaya; A D Brown; A E Washington; A M Garber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Matti Hakama; Geir Hoff; Ole Kronborg; Lars Påhlman
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Molecular pathogenesis of colorectal cancer: implications for molecular diagnosis.

Authors:  Christian N Arnold; Ajay Goel; Hubert E Blum; C Richard Boland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Cancer of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  S A Cannistra; J M Niloff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Debate over colon cancer screening.

Authors:  G Kolata
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Lawrence B Cohen; Julie S Wecsler; John N Gaetano; Ariel A Benson; Kenneth M Miller; Valerie Durkalski; James Aisenberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Vikram Boolchand; Gregory Olds; Joseph Singh; Pankaj Singh; Amitabh Chak; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Johansson; Ove Andrén; Swen-Olof Andersson; Paul W Dickman; Lars Holmberg; Anders Magnuson; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Colorectal cancer screening: clinical applications.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Jonathan P Terdiman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  What does the Italian population think about colorectal screening?

Authors:  Francesco Di Costanzo
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Recruiting patients into the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: strategies and challenges across 5 sites.

Authors:  Jennifer E Boehm; Elizabeth A Rohan; Judith Preissle; Amy DeGroff; Rebecca Glover-Kudon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Assessing awareness of colorectal cancer symptoms and screening in a peripheral colorectal surgical unit: a survey based study.

Authors:  Terri P McVeigh; Aoife J Lowery; Ronan M Waldron; Akhtar Mahmood; Kevin Barry
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Improving Colon Cancer Prevention in Poland. A Long Way Off.

Authors:  Karolina Obiała; Justyna Obiała; Krzysztof Jeziorski; Jakub Owoc; Małgorzata Mańczak; Robert Olszewski
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.771

5.  Validity of APCS score as a risk prediction score for advanced colorectal neoplasia in Chinese asymptomatic subjects: A prospective colonoscopy study.

Authors:  Wenbin Li; Lili Zhang; Jianyu Hao; Yongdong Wu; Di Lu; Haiying Zhao; Zhenjie Wang; Tianming Xu; Hong Yang; Jiaming Qian; Jingnan Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Colorectal cancer and screening awareness and sources of information in the Hungarian population.

Authors:  Noémi Gede; Diána Reményi Kiss; István Kiss
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.