Literature DB >> 16118076

Screening for colorectal cancer.

Matti Hakama1, Geir Hoff, Ole Kronborg, Lars Påhlman.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cancer in the Nordic countries after breast and prostate cancer. About 15,000 new cancers are diagnosed and more than 7000 patients will die from CRC in 2005. CRC fulfils most of the criteria for applying screening; the natural history is well known compared with many other cancers. CRC may be cured by detection at an early stage and even prevented by removal of possible precursors like adenomas. Faecal occult blood test is the only CRC screening modality that has been subjected to adequately sized randomised controlled trials (RCT) with long-term follow-up results, using Hemoccult-II. Sensitivity for strictly asymptomatic CRC is less than 30% for a single screening round, but programme sensitivity has been estimated to be more. Biennial screening with un-rehydrated Hemoccult-II slides has shown a CRC mortality reduction of 15-18% after approximately 10 years of follow-up in those targeted for screening. For those attending, the mortality reduction has been estimated at 23%. Denmark has decided to do feasibility studies to try to evaluate whether a population-based screening run by the community will have the same effect as has been demonstrated in the randomised trials. In Norway the government has accepted no formal population-based screening. In Finland, the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health made a recommendation in 2003 to the municipalities to run a randomised feasibility study with FOBT screening for colorectal cancer as a public health policy that is repeated every second year. In 2004 the first municipalities started. It has been claimed that today Sweden cannot afford CRC screening despite the potential mortality benefit. There is sufficient evidence for the efficacy of screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test every second year. There is, however, only little evidence on the effectiveness of screening when run as a public health service and there is insufficient knowledge of harmful effects and costs, even in RCTs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16118076     DOI: 10.1080/02841860510029969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  5 in total

1.  Attitude of the Italian general population towards prevention and screening of the most common tumors, with special emphasis on colorectal malignancies.

Authors:  Federica Domati; Estratios Travlos; Claudia Cirilli; Giuseppina Rossi; Piero Benatti; Massimiliano Marino; Giovanni Ponti; Maria Vandelli; Simone Valmori; Amal Oursana; Annalisa Pezzi; Maurizio Ponz de Leon
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Survival, surgical management and perioperative mortality of colorectal cancer in the 21-year experience of a specialised registry.

Authors:  Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Annalisa Pezzi; Piero Benatti; Antonio Manenti; Giuseppina Rossi; Carmela di Gregorio; Luca Roncucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Test, episode, and programme sensitivities of screening for colorectal cancer as a public health policy in Finland: experimental design.

Authors:  Nea Malila; Tiina Oivanen; Outi Malminiemi; Matti Hakama
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-11-20

4.  Association of colorectal adenoma with other malignancies in Swedish families.

Authors:  E Hiripi; J Lorenzo Bermejo; J Sundquist; K Hemminki
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Health needs as a priority of local authorities in Poland based on the example of implementation of health policy cancer programmes.

Authors:  Anna Augustynowicz; Aleksandra I Czerw; Andrzej Deptała
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.318

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.