Literature DB >> 3916061

Iohexol versus iopamidol for cervical myelography: a randomised double blind study.

P Macpherson, E Teasdale, C Coutinho, A McGeorge.   

Abstract

A randomised double blind trial of iohexol and iopamidol in cervical myelography by both lumbar puncture and direct puncture techniques is reported in one hundred consecutive patients. All patients had EEG examination before and 6-8 h after the myelogram and for each a questionnaire regarding adverse reactions was completed at set intervals. The side effects, radiographic quality of the examination and production of sharp wave activity on EEG were equivalent in the iohexol and iopamidol series. Contrary to previous reports, we consider that iohexol and iopamidol are equally acceptable for all forms of myelography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3916061     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-58-693-849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  3 in total

1.  Theory and practice: how much contrast for myelography?

Authors:  S F Halpin; P J Guest; J V Byrne
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  MRI in the management of suspected cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  P F Statham; D M Hadley; P Macpherson; R A Johnston; I Bone; G M Teasdale
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Myelographic findings in cervical spines without degenerative changes. Special reference to sagittal diameter of the dural sac.

Authors:  P Nakstad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.