Literature DB >> 18804946

Symptom prevalence and longitudinal follow-up in cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy.

Akemi Yamagishi1, Tatsuya Morita, Mitsunori Miyashita, Fukuko Kimura.   

Abstract

Palliative care for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the outpatient setting is important. The aims of this study were 1) to identify symptom prevalence and intensity in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and 2) to describe longitudinal follow-up data obtained from repeated assessment using the distress thermometer (DT). Questionnaires were distributed to consecutive cancer outpatients newly starting chemotherapy at the first appointment and at every hospital visit. The questionnaire included the severity of 11 symptoms (M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory [MDASI], Japanese version), the DT, and the need for help in four psychosocial areas (decision-making, economic problems, nutrition, and daily activities). In total, 4000 questionnaires were returned by 462 patients. The frequently identified problems were oral problems (21%), insomnia (19%), psychological distress (defined as a DT score of 6 or more; 15%), help with information and decision-making (14%), severe fatigue (8.2%), and severe appetite loss (6.3%). Cluster analysis identified four symptom clusters: 1) fatigue and somnolence; 2) pain, dyspnea, and numbness; 3) nausea, appetite loss, and constipation; and 4) psychological distress. Of 165 patients with a DT of score 6 or more, 115 patients (70%) demonstrated a DT score below 6 at a median of 17 days follow-up. In the remaining 50 patients who had a DT score of 6 or more at follow-up, 34 patients (68%) had one or more physical symptoms rated at 7 or more on an 11-point numeric rating scale. Compared with patients with a DT score below 6 at follow-up, patients with a DT score of 6 or more at follow-up had higher levels of all physical symptoms. Frequent symptoms experienced by cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy may be categorized as: 1) psychosocial issues (insomnia, psychological distress, decision-making support); 2) nutrition-gastrointestinal issues (oral problems, appetite loss, nausea); 3) fatigue; and 4) pain, dyspnea, and numbness. Developing a systematic intervention program targeting these four areas is urgently required. The DT score may be highly influenced by coexisting physical symptoms, and future studies to develop an appropriate system to identify patients with psychiatric comorbidity are necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18804946     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  38 in total

Review 1.  Emergency department visits for symptoms experienced by oncology patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amanda Digel Vandyk; Margaret B Harrison; Gail Macartney; Amanda Ross-White; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Treatment-related side effects and quality of life in cancer patients.

Authors:  Eva Mazzotti; Gian Carlo Antonini Cappellini; Stefania Buconovo; Roberto Morese; Alessandro Scoppola; Claudia Sebastiani; Paolo Marchetti
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Validation of the Portuguese version of functional assessment of cancer therapy-fatigue (FACT-F) in Brazilian cancer patients.

Authors:  Neli Muraki Ishikawa; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler; Alessandra Grasso Giglio; Clarissa Seródio da Rocha Baldotto; Carlos José Coelho de Andrade; Sophie Françoise Mauricette Derchain
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Gastrointestinal symptom representation in cancer symptom clusters: a synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Catherine H Cherwin
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 5.  Oral mucositis: the new paradigms.

Authors:  Douglas E Peterson; Rajesh V Lalla
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.645

6.  Does recall period have an effect on cancer patients' ratings of the severity of multiple symptoms?

Authors:  Qiuling Shi; Peter C Trask; Xin Shelley Wang; Tito R Mendoza; Winifred A Apraku; Maggie Malekifar; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 7.  Effects of web-based interventions on cancer patients' symptoms: review of randomized trials.

Authors:  N Fridriksdottir; S Gunnarsdottir; S Zoëga; B Ingadottir; E J G Hafsteinsdottir
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  The psychometric properties of cancer multisymptom assessment instruments: a clinical review.

Authors:  Aynur Aktas; Declan Walsh; Jordanka Kirkova
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Symptom cluster analyses based on symptom occurrence and severity ratings among pediatric oncology patients during myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Christina Baggott; Bruce A Cooper; Neyssa Marina; Katherine K Matthay; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 10.  A review of the literature on symptom clusters in studies that included oncology patients receiving primary or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Carmen Ward Sullivan; Heather Leutwyler; Laura B Dunn; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.036

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.