GOALS OF WORK: The purpose of this study was to validate the Portuguese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) in order to establish its assessment properties, including validity and reliability in a sample of Brazilian cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy patients with different types of cancer were included for this study; the mean age was 50.5 years. The reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility. Construct validity was assessed through convergent validity and discriminant validity. Convergent validity was examined by comparing the FACT-F to the SF-36. Discriminant validity of the FACT-F evaluated the ability of the scale to differentiate defined groups, discriminating patients according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and different stages of disease. MAIN RESULTS: FACT-F had high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.78 for physical well-being, 0.68 for social/family well-being, 0.75 for emotional well-being, 0.74 for functional well-being, 0.91 for fatigue, and 0.92 for total FACT-F). The range of test-retest intraclass correlation was from 0.72 to 0.91 (p < 0.0001). The Pearson product correlation revealed good correlations between the total FACT-F and subscales of the SF-36 in most dimensions, ranging from r = 0.51 to r = 0.76, except for SF-36 physical (r = 0.31). The positive correlations between the SF-36 vitality scale and FACT-F total (r = 0.76) and the fatigue subscale (r = 0.77) support the convergent validity. CONCLUSIONS: The Portuguese version of FACT-F is a reliable and valid instrument to assess quality of life and fatigue, representing a valid tool to screen cancer-related fatigue in Brazilian cancer patients.
GOALS OF WORK: The purpose of this study was to validate the Portuguese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) in order to establish its assessment properties, including validity and reliability in a sample of Brazilian cancerpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy patients with different types of cancer were included for this study; the mean age was 50.5 years. The reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility. Construct validity was assessed through convergent validity and discriminant validity. Convergent validity was examined by comparing the FACT-F to the SF-36. Discriminant validity of the FACT-F evaluated the ability of the scale to differentiate defined groups, discriminating patients according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and different stages of disease. MAIN RESULTS: FACT-F had high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.78 for physical well-being, 0.68 for social/family well-being, 0.75 for emotional well-being, 0.74 for functional well-being, 0.91 for fatigue, and 0.92 for total FACT-F). The range of test-retest intraclass correlation was from 0.72 to 0.91 (p < 0.0001). The Pearson product correlation revealed good correlations between the total FACT-F and subscales of the SF-36 in most dimensions, ranging from r = 0.51 to r = 0.76, except for SF-36 physical (r = 0.31). The positive correlations between the SF-36 vitality scale and FACT-F total (r = 0.76) and the fatigue subscale (r = 0.77) support the convergent validity. CONCLUSIONS: The Portuguese version of FACT-F is a reliable and valid instrument to assess quality of life and fatigue, representing a valid tool to screen cancer-related fatigue in Brazilian cancerpatients.
Authors: Juan J Dapueto; Carla Francolino; Liliana Servente; Chih-Hung Chang; Irene Gotta; Roberto Levin; María Del Carmen Abreu Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2003-08-20 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Leonardo Barbosa Almeida; Mateus Camaroti Laterza; Maria Urbana Pinto Brandão Rondon; Luciana Diniz Nagem Janot de Matos; Catherine L Granger; Linda Denehy; Cristino Carneiro Oliveira; Patricia Fernandes Trevizan; Daniel Godoy Martinez Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Cristiane Menezes Sirna Fregnani; José Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani; Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Latorre; Ana Maria de Almeida Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Felipe Augusto Ferreira Siquelli; Gabriela Rossi Zaia; Diocésio Alves Pinto de Andrade; Marcos Aristoteles Borges; Alexandre A Jácome; Gisele Augusta Sousa Nascimento Giroldo; Henrique Amorim Santos; Elizabeth A Hahn; Gilberto Uemura; Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva Journal: Springerplus Date: 2016-07-04
Authors: Paulo Furtado de Oliveira; Denise Hollanda Iunes; Ricardo Silva Alves; Jovana Maria de Carvalho; Flávia da Silva Menezes; Leonardo César Carvalho Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Date: 2018-09-26