Literature DB >> 20579835

Does recall period have an effect on cancer patients' ratings of the severity of multiple symptoms?

Qiuling Shi1, Peter C Trask, Xin Shelley Wang, Tito R Mendoza, Winifred A Apraku, Maggie Malekifar, Charles S Cleeland.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Choosing an appropriate recall period for symptom assessment in a clinical trial is dependent on the design and purpose of the trial.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of recall on symptom severity ratings by comparing ratings made using 24-hour and seven-day recall periods of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI).
METHODS: Forty-two patients in their third to eighth week of chemoradiation rated their symptoms using the MDASI on two separate occasions (T1 and T2), one week apart. At T1, patients were randomly assigned to rate symptoms using either a 24-hour or a seven-day recall. At T2, patients rated symptoms using the recall period not used at their first visit.
RESULTS: Comparing the 24-hour and seven-day recall periods, the correlation coefficient for total symptom severity was 0.888. All correlation coefficients for symptom severity items were >0.7 except for distress (r=0.67). The percentages of moderate to severe symptoms (rated >or=5) were consistent for both recall periods, with no significant difference between recall periods in the prevalence of moderate to severe symptoms. Cronbach alpha coefficients for both 24-hour and seven-day recalls were >0.8. Symptoms from both recall periods were more severe for patients with poorer performance status. Twenty patients were cognitively debriefed; 70% thought that the seven-day recall was "more appropriate" for the MDASI, but 85% did not think that recall period would influence their answers.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the MDASI in a seven-day recall format has psychometric properties consistent with the 24-hour recall version, which may promote its use in future cancer clinical trials and may inform the choice of recall period when symptoms are outcome measures. Copyright (c) 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20579835      PMCID: PMC3584563          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  21 in total

1.  Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research.

Authors:  C E Schwartz; M A Sprangers
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  The challenge of response shift for quality-of-life-based clinical oncology research.

Authors:  M A Sprangers; C E Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Symptom prevalence and longitudinal follow-up in cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Akemi Yamagishi; Tatsuya Morita; Mitsunori Miyashita; Fukuko Kimura
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Memory for pain: relation between past and present pain intensity.

Authors:  E Eich; J L Reeves; B Jaeger; S B Graff-Radford
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M M Oken; R H Creech; D C Tormey; J Horton; T E Davis; E T McFadden; P P Carbone
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  Pain and treatment of pain in minority patients with cancer. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Minority Outpatient Pain Study.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; R Gonin; L Baez; P Loehrer; K J Pandya
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; T R Mendoza; X S Wang; C Chou; M T Harle; M Morrissey; M C Engstrom
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Memory for symptoms in COPD patients: how accurate are their reports?

Authors:  P M Meek; S C Lareau; D Anderson
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 9.  Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; K M Ryan
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.473

10.  Magnitude and correlates of response shift in fatigue ratings in women undergoing adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Andrykowski; Kristine A Donovan; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 3.612

View more
  13 in total

1.  PROMIS and legacy measures compared in a supportive care intervention for breast cancer patients and caregivers: Experience from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Alla Sikorskii; David Victorson; Patrick O'Connor; Vered Hankin; Abolfazl Safikhani; Tracy Crane; Terry Badger; Gwen Wyatt
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Impact of recall period on primary brain tumor patient's self-report of symptoms.

Authors:  Terri S Armstrong; Elizabeth Vera-Bolanos; Alvina Acquaye; Mark R Gilbert; Tito R Mendoza
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2014-05-05

Review 3.  A literature synthesis of symptom prevalence and severity in persons receiving active cancer treatment.

Authors:  Carolyn Miller Reilly; Deborah Watkins Bruner; Sandra A Mitchell; Lori M Minasian; Ethan Basch; Amylou C Dueck; David Cella; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Cognitive functioning and quality of life following chemotherapy in pre- and peri-menopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer R Klemp; Jamie S Myers; Carol J Fabian; Bruce F Kimler; Qamar J Khan; Susan M Sereika; Annette L Stanton
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  A 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral health impact profile questionnaire.

Authors:  Niels Waller; Mike T John; Leah Feuerstahler; Kazuyoshi Baba; Pernilla Larsson; Sanja Peršić; Dóra Kende; Daniel R Reißmann; Ksenija Rener-Sitar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Association of demographic, economic and clinical variables in daily activities and symptoms presented by patients in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Adriane Cristina Bernat Kolankiewicz; Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza Magnago; Angela Isabel Dos Santos Dullius; Edvane Birelo Lopes De Domenico
Journal:  Can Oncol Nurs J       Date:  2017-10-01

7.  Qualitative Research on Fatigue Associated with Depression: Content Validity of the Fatigue Associated with Depression Questionnaire (FAsD-V2).

Authors:  Louis S Matza; Lindsey T Murray; Glenn A Phillips; Thomas J Konechnik; Ellen B Dennehy; Elizabeth N Bush; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Genetic and Non-genetic Factors Associated With Constipation in Cancer Patients Receiving Opioids.

Authors:  Eivor A Laugsand; Frank Skorpen; Stein Kaasa; Rainer Sabatowski; Florian Strasser; Peter Fayers; Pål Klepstad
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 4.488

9.  Pain Intensity Factors Changing Breakthrough Pain Prevalence in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Cross-Sectional Observational International Study.

Authors:  Erik Torbjørn Løhre; Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Cinzia Brunelli; Anne Kari Knudsen; Stein Kaasa; Pål Klepstad
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2018-11-10

10.  Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools.

Authors:  H J Alma; C de Jong; D Jelusic; M Wittmann; M Schuler; B J Kollen; R Sanderman; K Schultz; J W H Kocks; T Van der Molen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.