Douglas E Peterson1, Rajesh V Lalla. 1. Department of Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine and Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-1605, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mucositis has long been viewed as an unavoidable consequence of high-dose chemotherapy and/or radiation. Management has been directed to supportive care including oral pain control, nutritional support, infection treatment and control of diarrhea. Whereas these interventions have been valuable for clinical management, they have not been collectively directed to molecularly targeted prevention and treatment. This review addresses recent advances regarding mucosal injury in cancer patients, with emphasis on symptom clusters, genetically based tissue susceptibility and risk prediction, imaging technology, and computational biology. RECENT FINDINGS: Modeling of symptom clusters in cancer patients continues to mature. Although integration of mucositis into the paradigm is at an early stage, recent studies suggest that important molecular and clinical insights will emerge in this regard. Initial studies of genetic-based tissue risk are also providing a research basis that may lead to clinical risk prediction models. These advances are in part being engineered via new imaging and computational biology technologies, drawing upon literature in nonmucositis systems. Just as the past decade has been hallmarked by linkage of pathobiology with clinical expression of mucosal toxicity, the next decade promises to identify new molecular interactions and risk prediction models based on novel application of the analytic technologies. SUMMARY: Recent research has culminated in convergence of molecular pathobiology with models of symptom clusters, genetic-based risk, and imaging and computational biology. The field is poised to further delineate this paradigm, with the goal of development of molecularly targeted drugs and devices for mucositis management.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mucositis has long been viewed as an unavoidable consequence of high-dose chemotherapy and/or radiation. Management has been directed to supportive care including oral pain control, nutritional support, infection treatment and control of diarrhea. Whereas these interventions have been valuable for clinical management, they have not been collectively directed to molecularly targeted prevention and treatment. This review addresses recent advances regarding mucosal injury in cancerpatients, with emphasis on symptom clusters, genetically based tissue susceptibility and risk prediction, imaging technology, and computational biology. RECENT FINDINGS: Modeling of symptom clusters in cancerpatients continues to mature. Although integration of mucositis into the paradigm is at an early stage, recent studies suggest that important molecular and clinical insights will emerge in this regard. Initial studies of genetic-based tissue risk are also providing a research basis that may lead to clinical risk prediction models. These advances are in part being engineered via new imaging and computational biology technologies, drawing upon literature in nonmucositis systems. Just as the past decade has been hallmarked by linkage of pathobiology with clinical expression of mucosal toxicity, the next decade promises to identify new molecular interactions and risk prediction models based on novel application of the analytic technologies. SUMMARY: Recent research has culminated in convergence of molecular pathobiology with models of symptom clusters, genetic-based risk, and imaging and computational biology. The field is poised to further delineate this paradigm, with the goal of development of molecularly targeted drugs and devices for mucositis management.
Authors: Erika Hitre; Barna Budai; Vilmos Adleff; Ferenc Czeglédi; Zsolt Horváth; Fruzsina Gyergyay; József Lövey; Tibor Kovács; Zsolt Orosz; István Láng; Miklós Kásler; Judit Kralovánszky Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: S Sonis; R Haddad; M Posner; B Watkins; E Fey; T V Morgan; L Mookanamparambil; M Ramoni Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2006-08-22 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Zhi Yi Ong; Rachel J Gibson; Joanne M Bowen; Andrea M Stringer; Jocelyn M Darby; Richard M Logan; Ann Sj Yeoh; Dorothy M Keefe Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Joanne M Bowen; Rachel J Gibson; Anna Tsykin; Andrea M Stringer; Richard M Logan; Dorothy M K Keefe Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2007-10-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Linda S Elting; Catherine D Cooksley; Mark S Chambers; Adam S Garden Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-03-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Linda S Elting; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Patrick J Stiff; William Bensinger; Scott B Cantor; Catherine Cooksley; Ricardo Spielberger; Christos Emmanoulides Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Regina Maria Holanda de Mendonça; Marcela de Araújo; Carlos Emilio Levy; Joseane Morari; Rosângela A Silva; José Andres Yunes; Silvia Regina Brandalise Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: José Manuel Martinez; Dulcineia Pereira; Sérgio Chacim; Edgar Mesquita; Inês Sousa; Ângelo Martins; Teresa Azevedo; José Mário Mariz Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Giorgio Attinà; Alberto Romano; Palma Maurizi; Sara D'Amuri; Stefano Mastrangelo; Michele Antonio Capozza; Silvia Triarico; Antonio Ruggiero Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Gesa Meyer-Hamme; Kathrin Beckmann; Janine Radtke; Thomas Efferth; Henry Johannes Greten; Matthias Rostock; Sven Schröder Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 2.629