Literature DB >> 18797024

Changes in quadriceps femoris muscle strength using isometric exercise versus electrical stimulation.

R J Kubiak, K M Whitman, R M Johnston.   

Abstract

Reports in the literature appear to support the effectiveness of electrical stimulation as a means of increasing strength in normal muscles. The objective of this study was to measure and compare quadriceps muscle torque, isometrically and isokinetically, in three groups: 1) control group subjects (N = 9) did not alter their daily activities for 5 weeks, 2) isometric exercise group subjects (N = 10) exercised their quadriceps femoris muscle using maximum voluntary isometric exercises 3 times per week for 5 weeks, and 3) electrical stimulation group subjects (N = 10) who had 10 quadriceps femoris muscle contractions produced by electrical stimulation, 3 times per week for 5 weeks. No strength changes were noted in the control group; ANOVA revealed significant strength increases (P < 0.05) for both the electrical stimulation and isometric exercise groups. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987;8(11):537-541.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 18797024     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1987.8.11.537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  14 in total

Review 1.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary exercise.

Authors:  K Hainaut; J Duchateau
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  A phenomenological model that predicts forces generated when electrical stimulation is superimposed on submaximal volitional contractions.

Authors:  Ramu Perumal; Anthony S Wexler; Trisha M Kesar; Angela Jancosko; Yocheved Laufer; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-03-18

Review 3.  Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Leon Bax; Filip Staes; Arianne Verhagen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation. An overview and its application in the treatment of sports injuries.

Authors:  D A Lake
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Effect of training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on elbow flexion strength.

Authors:  William R Holcomb
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes?

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Patrick J Cozzone; David Bendahan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Motor unit recruitment during neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  C Scott Bickel; Chris M Gregory; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Improving the Efficiency of Electrical Stimulation Activities After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  David R Dolbow; William R Holcomb; Ashraf S Gorgey
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2014-06-18

9.  Effect of electrical stimulation training on the contractile characteristics of the triceps surae muscle.

Authors:  L Martin; G Cometti; M Pousson; B Morlon
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

10.  Distributed stimulation increases force elicited with functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Alie J Buckmire; Danielle R Lockwood; Cynthia J Doane; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.