Literature DB >> 1565927

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation. An overview and its application in the treatment of sports injuries.

D A Lake1.   

Abstract

In sports medicine, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been used for muscle strengthening, maintenance of muscle mass and strength during prolonged periods of immobilisation, selective muscle retraining, and the control of oedema. A wide variety of stimulators, including the burst-modulated alternating current ('Russian stimulator'), twin-spiked monophasic pulsed current and biphasic pulsed current stimulators, have been used to produce these effects. Several investigators have reported increased isometric muscle strength in both NMES-stimulated and exercise-trained healthy, young adults when compared to unexercised controls, and also no significant differences between the NMES and voluntary exercise groups. It appears that when NMES and voluntary exercise are combined there is no significant difference in muscle strength after training when compared to either NMES or voluntary exercise alone. There is also evidence that NMES can improve functional performance in a variety of strength tasks. Two mechanisms have been suggested to explain the training effects seen with NMES. The first mechanism proposes that augmentation of muscle strength with NMES occurs in a similar manner to augmentation of muscle strength with voluntary exercise. This mechanism would require NMES strengthening protocols to follow standard strengthening protocols which call for a low number of repetitions with high external loads and a high intensity of muscle contraction. The second mechanism proposes that the muscle strengthening seen following NMES training results from a reversal of voluntary recruitment order with a selective augmentation of type II muscle fibres. Because type II fibres have a higher specific force than type I fibres, selective augmentation of type II muscle fibres will increase the overall strength of the muscle. The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation to prevent muscle atrophy associated with prolonged knee immobilisation following ligament reconstruction surgery or injury has been extensively studied. NMES has been shown to be effective in preventing the decreases in muscle strength, muscle mass and the oxidative capacity of thigh muscles following knee immobilisation. In all but one of the studies, NMES was shown to be superior in preventing the atrophic changes of knee immobilisation when compared to no exercise, isometric exercise of the quadriceps femoris muscle group, isometric co-contraction of both the hamstrings and quadriceps femoris muscle groups, and combined NMES-isometric exercise. It has also been reported that NMES applied to the thigh musculature during knee immobilisation improves the performance on functional tasks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1565927     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199213050-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  57 in total

Review 1.  Two theories of muscle strength augmentation using percutaneous electrical stimulation.

Authors:  A Delitto; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1990-03

2.  Comparison of voluntary and electrical stimulation contraction torques*.

Authors:  J F Kramer; D M Lindsay; D Magee; T Wall; S W Mendryk
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Changes in quadriceps femoris muscle strength using isometric exercise versus electrical stimulation.

Authors:  R J Kubiak; K M Whitman; R M Johnston
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Ice and high voltage pulsed stimulation in treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains*.

Authors:  S L Michlovitz; W Smith; M Watkins
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  A comparison of torque generating capabilities of three different electrical stimulating currents.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; M Garrett; M Roberts
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Comparison of isometric muscle training and electrical stimulation supplementing isometric muscle training in the recovery after major knee ligament surgery. A preliminary report.

Authors:  E Eriksson; T Häggmark
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1979 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Effect of high voltage stimulation on edema reduction in the rat hind limb.

Authors:  T M Mohr; T K Akers; R G Landry
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1987-11

8.  Comparative comfort of three waveforms used in electrically eliciting quadriceps femoris muscle contractions.

Authors:  A Delitto; S J Rose
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1986-11

9.  Effects of waveform parameters on comfort during transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  B R Bowman; L L Baker
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man.

Authors:  R Garnett; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Late neural adaptations to electrostimulation resistance training of the plantar flexor muscles.

Authors:  Marc Jubeau; Raphaël Zory; Julien Gondin; Alain Martin; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on submental muscle activity.

Authors:  Debra M Suiter; Steven B Leder; Jacki L Ruark
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Effects of chronic electrical stimulation on paralyzed expiratory muscles.

Authors:  Anthony F DiMarco; Krzysztof E Kowalski
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-04-10

5.  Funktionelle Elektrostimulation Paraplegischer Patienten.

Authors:  Helmut Kern
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2014-07-08

6.  Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation frequency on muscles of the tongue.

Authors:  Heidi Kletzien; John A Russell; Glen Leverson; Nadine P Connor
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Less indication of muscle damage in the second than initial electrical muscle stimulation bout consisting of isometric contractions of the knee extensors.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Aldayel; Marc Jubeau; Michael R McGuigan; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  Muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Kazunori Nosaka; Abdulaziz Aldayel; Marc Jubeau; Trevor C Chen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and traditional swallowing rehabilitation in the treatment of stroke-related dysphagia.

Authors:  Shu-Fen Sun; Chien-Wei Hsu; Huey-Shyan Lin; Hsien-Pin Sun; Ping-Hsin Chang; Wan-Ling Hsieh; Jue-Long Wang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 10.  Combined application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary muscular contractions.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.