Literature DB >> 18793963

The observed variance between predicted and measured radiation dose in breast and prostate patients utilizing an in vivo dosimeter.

Charles W Scarantino1, Bradley R Prestidge, Mitchel S Anscher, Carolyn R Ferree, William T Kearns, Robert D Black, Natasha G Bolick, Gloria P Beyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Report the results of using a permanently implantable dosimeter in radiation therapy: determine specific adverse events, degree of migration, and acquire dose measurements during treatment to determine difference between expected and measured dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Dose Verification System is a wireless, permanently implantable metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimeter using a bidirectional antenna for power and data transfer. The study cohort includes 36 breast (33 patients received two devices) and 29 prostate (21 patients received two devices) cancer patients. A total of 1,783 and 1,749 daily dose measurements were obtained on breast and prostate patients, respectively. The measurements were compared with the planned expected dose. Biweekly computed tomography scans were obtained to evaluate migration and the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3, was used to evaluate adverse events.
RESULTS: Only Grade I/II adverse events of pain and bleeding were noted. There were only four instances of dosimeter migration of >5 mm from known factors. A deviation of > or =7% in cumulative dose was noted in 7 of 36 (19%) for breast cancer patients. In prostate cancer patients, a > or =7% deviation was noted in 6 of 29 (21%) and 8 of 19 (42%) during initial and boost irradiation, respectively. The two patterns of dose deviation were random and systematic. Some causes for these differences could involve organ movement, patient movement, or treatment plan considerations.
CONCLUSIONS: The Dose Verification System was not associated with significant adverse events or migration. The dosimeter can measure dose in situ on a daily basis. The accuracy and utility of the dose verification system complements current image-guided radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18793963      PMCID: PMC2590783          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  35 in total

1.  Anorectal irradiation in pelvic radiotherapy: an assessment using in-vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  D Hayne; U Johnson; D D'Souza; P B Boulos; H Payne
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.126

2.  Measurements and clinical consequences of prostate motion during a radiotherapy fraction.

Authors:  Aart J Nederveen; Uulke A van der Heide; Homan Dehnad; R Jeroen A van Moorselaar; Pieter Hofman; Jan J W Lagendijk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Evaluation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  K M Langen; J Pouliot; C Anezinos; M Aubin; A R Gottschalk; I-C Hsu; D Lowther; Y-M Liu; K Shinohara; L J Verhey; V Weinberg; M Roach
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Impact of the filling status of the bladder and rectum on their integral dose distribution and the movement of the uterus in the treatment planning of gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  A Buchali; S Koswig; S Dinges; P Rosenthal; J Salk; G Lackner; D Böhmer; L Schlenger; V Budach
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Assessment of target dose delivery in anal cancer using in vivo thermoluminescent dosimetry.

Authors:  D C Weber; P Nouet; J M Kurtz; A S Allal
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 6.  Common toxicity criteria: version 2.0. an improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy.

Authors:  A Trotti; R Byhardt; J Stetz; C Gwede; B Corn; K Fu; L Gunderson; B McCormick; M Morrisintegral; T Rich; W Shipley; W Curran
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  An implantable radiation dosimeter for use in external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Charles W Scarantino; David M Ruslander; Christopher J Rini; Gregory G Mann; H Troy Nagle; Robert D Black
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Dose response in prostate cancer with 8-12 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Gerald E Hanks; Alexandra L Hanlon; Barry Epstein; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  What dose of external-beam radiation is high enough for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Thomas N Eade; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski; Gerald E Hanks; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Technical evaluation of radiation dose delivered in prostate cancer patients as measured by an implantable MOSFET dosimeter.

Authors:  Gloria P Beyer; Charles W Scarantino; Bradley R Prestidge; Amir G Sadeghi; Mitchell S Anscher; Moyed Miften; Tammy B Carrea; Marianne Sims; Robert D Black
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  7 in total

1.  Investigation of an implantable dosimeter for single-point water equivalent path length verification in proton therapy.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ming Lu; Greg Mann; Ethan Cascio
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Investigations of interference between electromagnetic transponders and wireless MOSFET dosimeters: a phantom study.

Authors:  Zhong Su; Lisha Zhang; V Ramakrishnan; Michael Hagan; Mitchell Anscher
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  In vivo real-time rectal wall dosimetry for prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Hardcastle; Dean L Cutajar; Peter E Metcalfe; Michael L F Lerch; Vladimir L Perevertaylo; Wolfgang A Tomé; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  An injectable dosimeter for small animal irradiations.

Authors:  Guy Garty; Monica Pujol-Canadell; David J Brenner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  The Valley of Death in anticancer drug development: a reassessment.

Authors:  David J Adams
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 14.819

6.  Commissioning and implementation of an implantable dosimeter for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ivan Buzurovic; Timothy N Showalter; Matthew T Studenski; Robert B Den; Adam P Dicker; Junsheng Cao; Ying Xiao; Yan Yu; Amy Harrison
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  In vivo dose measurement using TLDs and MOSFET dosimeters for cardiac radiosurgery.

Authors:  Edward A Gardner; Thilaka S Sumanaweera; Oliver Blanck; Alyson K Iwamura; James P Steel; Sonja Dieterich; Patrick Maguire
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.