Literature DB >> 18790472

Agreement among glaucoma specialists in assessing progressive disc changes from photographs in open-angle glaucoma patients.

Henry D Jampel1, David Friedman, Harry Quigley, Susan Vitale, Rhonda Miller, Frederick Knezevich, Yulan Ding.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the agreement among glaucoma specialists in assessing progressive disc changes from photographs in a cohort of patients with glaucomatous visual field loss.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Three glaucoma specialists, masked to chronological sequence, examined pairs of optic disc stereophotographs to determine whether the appearance of the optic disc had changed. Eyes for which the observers disagreed were adjudicated to reach a consensus about which discs had changed over time.
RESULTS: Sequential stereophotographs, separated in time by a median of 26 months (range, five to 50), from 164 eyes of 111 patients were analyzed. Among the three observers, the number of interpretable discs judged to have changed was 11 of 155 (7%) for Observer 1, 17 of 155 (11%) for Observer 2, and 44 of 155 (28%) for Observer 3 (kappa = 0.20). Sixty-six eyes (43%) required adjudication. After adjudication, the consensus was that 10 discs had changed, six eyes in which the disc was worse in the later photograph and four eyes in which the disc was judged to appear more glaucomatous in the earlier photograph.
CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement among glaucoma specialists in judging progressive optic disc change from stereophotographs was slight to fair. After masked adjudication, in 40% of the cases in which the optic disc appeared to have progressed in glaucoma severity, the photograph of the "worse" optic disc was in fact taken at the start of the study. Caution must be exercised when using disc change on photographs as the "gold standard" for diagnosing open-angle glaucoma or determining its progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18790472      PMCID: PMC2730020          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  13 in total

1.  Test-retest reproducibility of optic disk deterioration detected from stereophotographs by masked graders.

Authors:  Richard K Parrish; Joyce C Schiffman; William J Feuer; Douglas R Anderson; Donald L Budenz; Maria-Cristina Wells-Albornoz; Ruth Vandenbroucke; Michael A Kass; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Use of progressive glaucomatous optic disk change as the reference standard for evaluation of diagnostic tests in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Detection and prognostic significance of optic disc hemorrhages during the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Douglas R Anderson; William J Feuer; Julia A Beiser; Joyce Schiffman; Richard K Parrish; Jody R Piltz-Seymour; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the detection of glaucomatous progression of the optic disc.

Authors:  A L Coleman; A Sommer; C Enger; H L Knopf; R L Stamper; D S Minckler
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Knowledge of chronology of optic disc stereophotographs influences the determination of glaucomatous change.

Authors:  Undraa Altangerel; Atilla Bayer; Jeffrey D Henderer; L Jay Katz; William C Steinmann; George L Spaeth
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Clinical agreement among glaucoma experts in the detection of glaucomatous changes of the optic disk using simultaneous stereoscopic photographs.

Authors:  Augusto Azuara-Blanco; L Jay Katz; George L Spaeth; Stephen A Vernon; Fiona Spencer; Ines M Lanzl
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Comparison of methods to evaluate the optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer for glaucomatous change.

Authors:  J Caprioli; B Prum; T Zeyen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Reproducibility of evaluation of optic disc change for glaucoma with stereo optic disc photographs.

Authors:  Thierry Zeyen; Stefano Miglior; Norbert Pfeiffer; Jose Cunha-Vaz; Ingrid Adamsons
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis.

Authors:  Tessa Fayers; Nicholas G Strouthidis; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

Authors:  A Sommer; J M Tielsch; J Katz; H A Quigley; J D Gottsch; J Javitt; K Singh
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-08
View more
  59 in total

1.  Glaucomatous progression in series of stereoscopic photographs and Heidelberg retina tomograph images.

Authors:  Neil O'Leary; David P Crabb; Steven L Mansberger; Brad Fortune; Michael D Twa; Michael J Lloyd; Aachal Kotecha; David F Garway-Heath; George A Cioffi; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05

2.  Utility of digital stereo images for optic disc evaluation.

Authors:  Richard A Stone; Gui-Shuang Ying; Denise J Pearson; Mayank Bansal; Manika Puri; Eydie Miller; Judith Alexander; Jody Piltz-Seymour; William Nyberg; Maureen G Maguire; Jayan Eledath; Harpreet Sawhney
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  [Reliable recognition of glaucoma by spectral domain optical coherence tomography?].

Authors:  C K Brinkmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  From Machine to Machine: An OCT-Trained Deep Learning Algorithm for Objective Quantification of Glaucomatous Damage in Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Alessandro A Jammal; Atalie C Thompson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Crowdsourcing to Evaluate Fundus Photographs for the Presence of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Xueyang Wang; Lucy I Mudie; Mani Baskaran; Ching-Yu Cheng; Wallace L Alward; David S Friedman; Christopher J Brady
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Predicting glaucomatous progression in glaucoma suspect eyes using relevance vector machine classifiers for combined structural and functional measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Intae Lee; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Rates of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness change in glaucoma patients and control subjects.

Authors:  N O'Leary; P H Artes; D M Hutchison; M T Nicolela; B C Chauhan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  The relationship between cup-to-disc ratio and estimated number of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Andrew J Tatham; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Discrepancy between optic disc and nerve fiber layer assessment and optical coherence tomography in detecting glaucomatous progression.

Authors:  Jong Rak Lee; Kyung Rim Sung; Jung Hwa Na; Kilhwan Shon; Kyoung Sub Lee
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Features of optic disc progression in patients with ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael J Lloyd; Steven L Mansberger; Brad A Fortune; Hau Nguyen; Rodrigo Torres; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner; Chris A Johnson; George A Cioffi
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.