Literature DB >> 18787654

Identification and evolution of drug efflux pump in clinical Enterobacter aerogenes strains isolated in 1995 and 2003.

Jacqueline Chevalier1, Céline Mulfinger, Eric Garnotel, Pierre Nicolas, Anne Davin-Régli, Jean-Marie Pagès.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The high mortality impact of infectious diseases will increase due to accelerated evolution of antibiotic resistance in important human pathogens. Development of antibiotic resistance is a evolutionary process inducing the erosion of the effectiveness of our arsenal of antibiotics. Resistance is not necessarily limited to a single class of antibacterial agents but may affect many unrelated compounds; this is termed 'multidrug resistance' (MDR). The major mechanism of MDR is the active expulsion of drugs by bacterial pumps; the treatment of gram negative bacterial infections is compromised due to resistance mechanisms including the expression of efflux pumps that actively expel various usual antibiotics (beta-lactams, quinolones, ...). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Enterobacter aerogenes has emerged among Enterobacteriaceae associated hospital infections during the last twenty years due to its faculty of adaptation to antibiotic stresses. Clinical isolates of E. aerogenes belonging to two strain collections isolated in 1995 and 2003 respectively, were screened to assess the involvement of efflux pumps in antibiotic resistance. Drug susceptibility assays were performed on all bacterial isolates and an efflux pump inhibitor (PAbetaN) previously characterized allowed to decipher the role of efflux in the resistance. Accumulation of labelled chloramphenicol was monitored in the presence of an energy poison to determine the involvement of active efflux on the antibiotic intracellular concentrations. The presence of the PAbetaN-susceptible efflux system was also identified in resistant E. aerogenes strains.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: For the first time a noticeable increase in clinical isolates containing an efflux mechanism susceptible to pump inhibitor is report within an 8 year period. After the emergence of extended spectrum beta-lactamases in E. aerogenes and the recent characterisation of porin mutations in clinical isolates, this study describing an increase in inhibitor-susceptible efflux throws light on a new step in the evolution of mechanism in E. aerogenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18787654      PMCID: PMC2527680          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Among Enterobacteriaceae associated hospital infections, Enterobacter aerogenes has emerged during the last twenty years due to its efficient adaptative response to environmental stresses [1]. This common hospital pathogen in Europe is involved in nosocomial respiratory tract and urinary infectious diseases [2]–[8]. This behaviour has been associated with a decreased susceptibility to the most recently developed cephalosporins, including cefepime and cefpirome (last cephalosporin generation), and to carbapenems [4], [9]–[11]. An increasing number of clinical E. aerogenes strains exhibits a plasmid encoding extended-spectrum ß-lactamase associated with an aminoglycoside enzymatic resistance in addition to a chromosomal cephalosporinase and the clinical isolates present also an acquired resistance, via target mutation, to other antibiotic classes such as quinolones [2], [4]–[15]. The regulation of envelope permeability including the synthesis of porins, the modification of lipopolysaccharide and the expression of efflux pumps has been reported by several studies:(i) a strong correlation has been reported between the absence of the E. aerogenes major porin, Omp36, and imipenem resistance, (ii) some isolates showing a resistance towards polymyxin group had a simultaneous alteration of the lipopolysaccharide structure and, (iii) in multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains the expression of an efflux pump has been demonstrated to contribute to a severe decrease in intracellular concentrations of various antibiotic classes [3], [4], [10], [12], [13], [16]. It has been demonstrated that during 5 days of imipenem treatment, clinical isolates had developed imipenem resistance via a decrease of porin synthesis conjointly to a production of efflux system [4], [17]. This tremendous capacity to rapidly develop antibiotic resistance has been associated to the regulation cascade involving the mar regulon and ramA regulator gene which control the expression of membrane transporters [1]. Bacterial efflux pumps represent an active protection mechanism against toxic compounds and the major efflux pump, AcrAB-TolC, identified in E. aerogenes clinical isolates expels a variety of compounds including detergents and structurally unrelated antimicrobial agents such as quinolones, tetracyclines and chloramphenicol [18]–[21]. The activity of efflux pump in various resistant clinical isolates has been characterized by using different efflux pump inhibitors that compete with the antibiotic efflux or with an energy poison that collapses the membrane potential required for the active antibiotic transport [22]–[24]. The poly-specificity of efflux transporters confers a general resistance phenotype that can drive the acquisition of additional mechanisms of antibiotic resistance such as target mutation or secretion of enzymes that degrade antibiotics and also reinforce the effect of these acquired mechanisms [20]. It has been recently demonstrated that the expression of the AcrAB-TolC pump is an important prerequisite for the selection of fluoroquinolone resistant mutants that exhibit mutated targets (DNA gyrase) in various Gram-negative bacteria such as Salmonella or Campylobacter, two major food-borne pathogens involved in severe human diseases [25], [26]. Consequently, the spread of this resistance mechanism and the modulation of the different bacterial responses to antibiotic therapy calls for the identification of efflux pump activity and their prevalence in clinical strains. An important question addresses the evolution of drug resistance and the dissemination of this efflux mechanism in Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. To this aim, we decided to analyse two E. aerogenes populations isolated from Marseille hospitals in 1995 and 2003. The local criteria used in 1995 [10], were re-used in 2003 in order to prevent (i) introduction of some bias caused by different procedures used by other institutions and (ii) ecological variance due to a plethora of variable associated with different geographic areas. These isolates were selected according to their noticeable cross-resistance pattern to cephalosporins as previously reported [10]. In addition, the epidemiology of the E. aerogenes strains are checked in the two collections. We thus compare the two collections for resistance to structurally unrelated antibiotics to assess the frequency of strains exhibiting a MDR phenotype that may reflect the production of an efflux mechanism and to evaluate the number of strains expressing a documented efflux pump during this 1995–2003 interval.

Results

Strain characterization and antibiotic susceptibility of E. aerogenes isolates

The DNA restriction pattern of isolates collected during the years 1995 and 2003 were performed and analysed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to determine their relatedness. These DNA restriction patterns were compared according to criteria proposed by Tenover et al. [27]. Figure 1 illustrates a representative set of this molecular epidemiological typing. Isolates whose patterns were indistinguishable or differing by no more than 3 fragments were considered to belong to the same epidemic clone. An isolate was considered to be possibly related to the outbreak strain if their patterns did not differ in more than 4–6 bands. The patterns were unrelated if they showed more than 7 band differences. Forty-eight strains were studied and 46 generated reproducible fingerprint patterns. Among them the pattern of 21 strains was identical, 14 showed 1 to 5 band differences and 11 had a pattern with more than 6 band differences. Among these eleven strains, 3 isolates were closely related. 35 isolates were considered to belong to the same epidemiological prevalent clone previously reported [4], [5], [9], [28] and 11 strains were consistent to be of different origin.
Figure 1

PFGE of XbaI-digested genomic DNA preparations from various clinical Enterobacter aerogenes isolates.

1995 isolates: 6582, 106701, 313, 139, 120, 31, 70, 17, 49, 130, 109, 183, 52. 2003 isolates: 101979, 121653, 109688, 181243, 138074, 121435, 109709, 121652, 128500, 116621. ATCC13048 and EA27, used as reference strains. Molecular weight markers are indicated: a, 48.5 kb; b, 97 kb; c, 145.5 kb; d, 194 kb; e, 242.5 kb; f, 291 kb; g, 340 kb; h, 388 kb; i, 437 kb; j, 485 kb; h, 534 kb.

PFGE of XbaI-digested genomic DNA preparations from various clinical Enterobacter aerogenes isolates.

1995 isolates: 6582, 106701, 313, 139, 120, 31, 70, 17, 49, 130, 109, 183, 52. 2003 isolates: 101979, 121653, 109688, 181243, 138074, 121435, 109709, 121652, 128500, 116621. ATCC13048 and EA27, used as reference strains. Molecular weight markers are indicated: a, 48.5 kb; b, 97 kb; c, 145.5 kb; d, 194 kb; e, 242.5 kb; f, 291 kb; g, 340 kb; h, 388 kb; i, 437 kb; j, 485 kb; h, 534 kb. The antibiotic susceptibilities of strains collected during the periods 1995 and 2003 were presented in Table 1–2. A large number of the isolates exhibited a noticeable resistance phenotype, e.g. 61% and 74 to 83% of strains were resistant to chloramphenicol and tested quinolones, respectively (Table 3). Conversely, only 2% and 9% of strains were resistant to imipenem and cefepime respectively. About 12% of tested strains harboured a susceptible phenotype against the used antibiotics (imipenem, cefepime, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin). Although chloramphenicol is now rarely used in human therapy, a major proportion of the screened isolates exhibited chloramphenicol resistance. In addition, these strains also presented a high level resistance against other assayed antibiotics.
Table 1

Susceptibilities of the E. aerogenes isolates (1995) to different antibiotics (MIC µg/mL)a.

StrainIMICEFTETCHLNALNFLOFLSPA
0141256>51212812864
1414256>512256644
52418>51264328
70,05816820,5<40,06
11184256>512128128128
121418640,125<40,5
16412821283216<4<0,5
172416>256>5121283232
19>4168256>512512128256
20412128>51225612864
311162256>51212864128
34>41288256>512512128128
3624>25616>512512256128
444416>256>512256128256
49>488>256>512512128256
52>41264>5122566416
53>418>256>512256128256
54264216>512646416
56>416<0,5256>512256128128
59214<4<4<4<4<0,5
70>484>256512256128256
71242<4>512<4<48
7628116>512646416
98132>51281281<40,5
104232128256>512646432
108212<4>51264328
1094416>256>512512128512
1150,5122>5121281664
120111256>5121281664
124412240,25<40,125
130418>256>512128128256
135111240,25<4<0,03
13842444<4<4<0,5
1392321256>5126412864
148112<4648<4<0,5
151144484<40,06
1790,542256>51212864128
18341284>256>51225664256
313212128>51212864128
317>416432>512323216
441448>256>512256128256
701>4648>256>512512128256
6582444256>512256128256
72374324256>512256128256
106701218>256>512256128512

The values are the means of three independent assays.

Antimicrobial agent abbreviations: IMI, Imipenem; CEF, Cefepime; TET, Tetracycline; CHL, Chloramphenicol; NAL, Nalidixic acid; NFL, Norfloxacin; OFL, Ofloxacin; SPA, Sparfloxacin.

Table 2

Susceptibilities of the E. aerogenes isolates (2003) to different antibiotics (MIC µg/mL)a.

StrainIMICEFTETCHLNALNFLOFLSPA
1001281218>5126412864
101234214>256>5121286464
101451112480,25<40,06
10197942416>512128128256
103280418816<4<4<0,5
10578444432>512256128256
105891210,5840,25<40,06
1062064644256>512128128256
107868280,5128>512128128128
1080554116165128<4<0,5
108418128>256>512256128256
1089694141616<4<4<0,5
10968814216>5121286464
10970942416>512512128256
110199210,5480,25<40,06
1103602132>256>512256128256
11072141416>512512256512
1116312116>256>512256128256
1121444141616<4<4<0,5
112446413232128<4<4<0,5
112978442<4>51225664128
113022242256>51225612864
115264448>256>512256128256
118259124256>512256128256
121435288>256>512512128256
1216521120,580,25<44
121653112256>512256256128
121681244256>512512128256
1225540,542128>512646464
12279124264>512256256128
1232584181616<4<4<0,5
123369418256>512256128256
12380021448<4<4<0,5
128500124256>512128128128
128553>488>256>512128128256
129689448>256>51225664256
131102428>256>512256128256
1311500,524256>512128128128
131538>4328>256>512256128256
13414621432>5121286432
134147211664>51225612864
13616012216>512256128256
1374544124>512323216
137464>4648>256>512512128256
13807411116>51212812864
13821518164>512128128128
181131284256>5122566432
181243414<416<4<4<0,5

The values are the means of three independent assays.

Antimicrobial agent abbreviations: IMI, Imipenem; CEF, Cefepime; TET, Tetracycline; CHL, Chloramphenicol; NAL, Nalidixic acid; NFL, Norfloxacin; OFL, Ofloxacin; SPA, Sparfloxacin.

Table 3

Percentages of Enterobacter aerogenes resistant strains.

YearNumber of strainsNumber of resistant strains
IMICEFTETCHLNALNFLOFLSPA
MIC (µg/ml)>8>32>8>16>16>1>1>2
1995452682939373436
2003480252838373537
Total9328135777746972
%2.18.613.961.382.779.574.178.4

Antimicrobial agent abbreviations: IMI, Imipenem; CEF, Cefepime; TET, Tetracycline; CHL, Chloramphenicol; NAL, Nalidixic Acid; NFL, Norfloxacin; OFL, Ofloxacin; SPA, Sparfloxacin.

The values are the means of three independent assays. Antimicrobial agent abbreviations: IMI, Imipenem; CEF, Cefepime; TET, Tetracycline; CHL, Chloramphenicol; NAL, Nalidixic acid; NFL, Norfloxacin; OFL, Ofloxacin; SPA, Sparfloxacin. The values are the means of three independent assays. Antimicrobial agent abbreviations: IMI, Imipenem; CEF, Cefepime; TET, Tetracycline; CHL, Chloramphenicol; NAL, Nalidixic acid; NFL, Norfloxacin; OFL, Ofloxacin; SPA, Sparfloxacin. Antimicrobial agent abbreviations: IMI, Imipenem; CEF, Cefepime; TET, Tetracycline; CHL, Chloramphenicol; NAL, Nalidixic Acid; NFL, Norfloxacin; OFL, Ofloxacin; SPA, Sparfloxacin.

PAßN-susceptible efflux pump in E. aerogenes

We have previously demonstrated that the efflux pump inhibitor phenylalanine-arginine ß-naphthylamide (PAßN) is able to block the efflux involved in chloramphenicol resistance in E. aerogenes clinical strains [13], [24]. In order to evaluate the activity of this efflux mechanism in the two collections of E. aerogenes isolates, the effect of PAßN was assayed on the level of chloramphenicol susceptibility. For a number of isolates, addition of PAßN caused an increase in chloramphenicol susceptibility by at least three dilution factors (e.g. reduction of the MIC from 8 to 1 µg/ml) indicating the involvement of a PAßN-susceptible efflux in the resistance. In presence of PAßN, the MIC for chloramphenicol was noticeably decreased in about 40% of all non-susceptible (intermediate+resistant strains, I+R) isolates tested (Table 4). This result reflects the prevalence of a functional efflux mechanism that is susceptible to the inhibitor in the collected strains.
Table 4

Effect of EPI on chloramphenicol susceptibility of E. aerogenes strains.

YearNumber of strainsI+R a EP b susceptible I+REP insusceptible I+R
1995+200393702941
19954532923
200348382018

I, R a: Intermediate, Resistant.

EP b: Efflux Pump susceptible when PAßN induces a decrease of at least 3 dilutions.

I, R a: Intermediate, Resistant. EP b: Efflux Pump susceptible when PAßN induces a decrease of at least 3 dilutions. It is important to note that among the total of I+R strains exhibiting a PAßN-susceptible efflux mechanism, the majority were isolated in 2003: the EPI-reversed strains were observed in a significantly greater number of chloramphenicol resistant strains (Table 4) selected in 2003 (20/29) than those selected in 1995 (9/29). These results indicate a noticeable increase in number of PAßN-susceptible efflux pumps acting in the strains isolated in 2003.

Evidence of active efflux for chloramphenicol in multiresistant E. aerogenes

The activity of efflux pump in resistant isolates harbouring a PAßN-susceptible efflux was evaluated by measuring the intracellular accumulation of radiolabelled chloramphenicol in the reference strain and selected clinical isolates. Carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), was a well-described tool allowing to characterize an energy-dependent efflux in resistant Gram-negative bacteria [16], [23], [24]. The variation of intracellular drug accumulation was evaluated in the absence and in the presence of this membrane energy uncoupler. Different strains representative of the two series were assayed in addition to the susceptible ATCC strain. By comparison to the ATCC strain, a 65% reduction in the chloramphenicol accumulation was detected in all tested chloramphenicol resistant E. aerogenes strains (Figure 2). This accumulation was significantly increased in the presence of CCCP during the incubation: 3.5 to 5 fold increase of intracellular chloramphenicol was obtained in the presence of the uncoupler (Figure 2). These results indicate that an active efflux pump is involved in chloramphenicol resistance in these isolates causing a decrease of intracellular drug concentration (Table 5).
Figure 2

Uptake of 14C chloramphenicol by E. aerogenes strains.

Accumulation of [14C] chloramphenicol was measured in ATCC type strain (A) and in clinical strains isolated during the years 1995 (B) and 2003 (C). ATCC13048 in the absence (+) and in the presence (*) of CCCP; strain 106701 in the absence (□) and in the presence (▪) of CCCP; strain 6582 in the absence (○) and in the presence (•) of CCCP; strain 109688 in the absence (◊) and in the presence (⧫) of CCCP; strain 134147 in the absence (▵) and in the presence of (▴) CCCP. Each point is the mean of three independent experiments. Values were plotted as cpm/OD600 over time (s).

Table 5

Antimicrobial susceptibilities and chloramphenicol accumulation in E. aerogenes strains.

Strains (year)MIC (µg/mL)Ratio of CHL accumulation a
OFLNFLCIPSPANALCHLTETCEFIMI
EA6582 (1995)128 (32)256 (256)128 (64)256 (32)>512 (512)256 (64)4443.9
EA106701 (1995)128 (32)256 (256)64 (64)512 (32)>512 (256)>256 (64)8225.0
EA109688 (2003)64 (32)128 (128)64 (32)64 (4)>512 (256)16 (1)2413.5
EA134147 (2003)128 (16)256 (256)64 (32)64 (4)>512 (512)64 (<4)16124.0
ATCC 15038 b N.D c 0.12 (0.12)N.D0.06N.D2 (1)0.50.250.251.1
EAEP294 b N.D6416N.D1024 (128)32 (32)<0.25N.DN.DN.D
EAEP289 b N.D25632N.D1024 (256)1024 (128)8N.DN.DN.D
EA27 b >128256 (128)32>64>128512 (64)16 (2)N.DN.D3.0

Ratio of chloramphenicol accumulated at 600 s with and without CCCP.

E. aerogenes control strains used: ATCC 15038 reference strain that expresses a normal level of the AcrAB efflux system; EAEP294 (acrA deleted mutant)and EAEP289 that exhibits overexpression of the AcrAB efflux system.

N.D: not determined.

Antimicrobial agent abbreviations: IMI, Imipenem; CEF, Cefepime; TET, Tetracycline; CHL, Chloramphenicol; NAL, Nalidixic Acid; NFL, Norfloxacin; OFL, Ofloxacin; SPA, Sparfloxacin; CIP, Ciprofloxacin. Values in parentheses were determined in the presence of efflux pump inhibitor PAßN at 26.3 µg/ml.

Uptake of 14C chloramphenicol by E. aerogenes strains.

Accumulation of [14C] chloramphenicol was measured in ATCC type strain (A) and in clinical strains isolated during the years 1995 (B) and 2003 (C). ATCC13048 in the absence (+) and in the presence (*) of CCCP; strain 106701 in the absence (□) and in the presence (▪) of CCCP; strain 6582 in the absence (○) and in the presence (•) of CCCP; strain 109688 in the absence (◊) and in the presence (⧫) of CCCP; strain 134147 in the absence (▵) and in the presence of (▴) CCCP. Each point is the mean of three independent experiments. Values were plotted as cpm/OD600 over time (s). Ratio of chloramphenicol accumulated at 600 s with and without CCCP. E. aerogenes control strains used: ATCC 15038 reference strain that expresses a normal level of the AcrAB efflux system; EAEP294 (acrA deleted mutant)and EAEP289 that exhibits overexpression of the AcrAB efflux system. N.D: not determined. Antimicrobial agent abbreviations: IMI, Imipenem; CEF, Cefepime; TET, Tetracycline; CHL, Chloramphenicol; NAL, Nalidixic Acid; NFL, Norfloxacin; OFL, Ofloxacin; SPA, Sparfloxacin; CIP, Ciprofloxacin. Values in parentheses were determined in the presence of efflux pump inhibitor PAßN at 26.3 µg/ml.

Detection of an immunorelated-AcrA component of the efflux pump

To analyse the correlation between multidrug resistance and the presence of an efflux system we investigated the production of an immunorelated-AcrA component in the isolates exhibiting an energy dependent efflux of chloramphenicol [29], [30]. Regarding the expression of membrane transporters, we have recently demonstrated that a positive signal obtained from RT-PCR is not conclusive to conclude for the correct and functional production of a bacterial membrane protein [31]. It is important to mention that for membrane proteins (such as efflux transporters), several post-translational steps down-regulate their production in addition to the transcriptional regulation of their genes [31], [32]. There are the reasons for which the production of an active efflux immunorelated to the AcrAB-TolC system was checked by western blot analysis using an anti-AcrA polyclonal antibody as previously described [33]. We observed the presence of an immunorelated-AcrA protein in a large number of resistant E. aerogenes clinical isolates compared to E. aerogenes EAEP294 which contains an acrA gene knockout insertion. Interestingly, the isolate 54 presented no immunorelated-AcrA signal. Concerning EAEP294, it has been previously reported that this strain contains another efflux pump involved in antibiotic resistance and the anti-AcrA antibody is able to recognize an immunorelated-AcrA protein [33], [34]. Moreover, several clinical strains exhibited a high level of AcrA-like protein production similar to that observed in strain EAEP289, which has previously be shown to have an increased AcrA expression [21] and a high efflux pump activity (data not shown).

Discussion

Emergence and evolution of drug resistance mechanisms in bacteria is an unavoidable phenomenon because it represents a natural adaptative response to environmental stress. Among the resistance mechanisms, high expression of drug efflux pumps is an underestimated mechanism which is contributing to resistance in clinical Gram-negative bacteria isolates of many pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa [35], [36], Klebsiella pneumoniae [29], [37] or E. aerogenes [13], [21]. The prevalence of an identified active efflux system in highly resistant clinical E. aerogenes strains collected, during 1995 and 2003, in a same area has been investigated. In a preliminary screen, the two collections exhibited a similar resistance profile for tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and the quinolones tested. In addition, molecular epidemiological typing indicates a relatively close relationship between the analyzed isolates and the previously major prevalent clone identified in different hospital infections due to E. aerogenes [4], [9], [11]. These results provide evidence for a stability in the resistance phenotype between 1995–2003 in the isolation site. As previously reported, a broad spectrum efflux pump inhibitor, such as PAßN, may be used to discriminate between the resistance mechanisms involved in resistant isolates and to characterize the role of inhibitor-susceptible efflux pumps [22], [24], [38]. It has been demonstrated that PAßN may increase the activity of antibiotics which are expelled by efflux pumps such as AcrAB-TolC or MexAB-OprM [13], [22], [29], [38], [39]. This compound has been shown to restore the antibiotic intracellular concentration in several Gram-negative bacteria species including E. aerogenes [24], [30]. In all cases, the level of restoration of antibiotic susceptibility depends on the presence of additional resistance mechanisms such as target mutations or enzymatic barriers [30], [37], [39]–[41]. An active and PAßN-susceptible drug efflux system was evidenced in multiresistant E. aerogenes isolates. The activity of chloramphenicol efflux was determined in the presence and absence of PAßN, and the MICs were significantly decreased in the presence of PAßN in 40% of chloramphenicol resistant strains. In susceptible strains (MIC<8 µg/mL), the MICs were not noticeably affected by PAßN. These results indicate the presence of an efflux resistance mechanism that is reversed by PAßN addition in some chloramphenicol resistant strains. In these strains, the intracellular chloramphenicol concentration was influenced by CCCP, as the addition of this uncoupler of the proton motive force induced a substantial increase (3–5 fold) in the level of accumulated chloramphenicol. Moreover, in some isolates, a production of an immunorelated-AcrA efflux component was detected suggesting the involvement of a AcrAB-like efflux pump. It is interesting to note that from the twenty nine strains that exhibit this PAßN-reversed efflux, twenty were isolated in 2003 and only nine were isolated in 1995. This variation indicated that the number of strains able to expel chloramphenicol had noticeably increased during this eight year interval. This is a major point taking into account that chloramphenicol is rarely used in clinical settings and the relative conservation of a resistant phenotype in the two tested collections. This result suggests that during this eight year period, the clinical environment, such as use of antimicrobial products and the consequent pressure on bacterial flora or colonizing bacteria, has selected strains expressing poly-selective efflux pumps since the FloR pump exhibits a specific activity for structurally-related phenicol drugs [42]. Several chemicals, e.g. biocides, bile salts or other efflux substrates are efficient agents for selecting bacteria that overexpress efflux pump mechanism [43]–[46]. This type of resistance survey is more restricted that global studies carried out in ESAC group [47], [48] or in the EARSS group [49] but yields interesting acute data concerning the evolution of one bacterial species and one resistance mechanism in a given hospital area. This selection allows us to a better approach of the antibiotic resistance evolution during the selected period. Regarding the resistance survey, it is important to mention that the COST Action BM0701(see http://www.cost.esf.org/bmbs) starting this year, is focused to the study of drug efflux mechanisms from clinical to chemical aspects. After the emergence of extended spectrum ß-lactamases in E. aerogenes isolates and the recent characterisation of porin mutations in clinical isolates [2], [6], [11], [15], [50], this study describing an increase in inhibitor-susceptible efflux throws light on a new step in the evolution of mechanism in E. aerogenes. With the recent description of the key role of efflux pumps in favouring the acquisition of other resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative bacteria such as target mutation [25], [26], and in bacterial pathogenesis and fitness [51], [52], the increase of the number of clinical strains overproducing efflux pumps represents a serious emerging risk for the treatment of these infections.

Methods

Bacterial strains and growth media

A total of 93 strains of Enterobacter aerogenes were isolated in 1995 and 2003 in the hospitals of Marseille (France) from a variety of clinical specimens (respiratory tract, secretions, blood, urinary tract, etc …). They were selected according to their noticeable resistance against several ß-lactam antibiotics [10]. The Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 15038 type strain was used as the reference (susceptible) strain for uptake of chloramphenicol. For immunodetection and characterization of efflux pumps, the strains EA ATCC 15038, EAEP289 (derivative of the clinical strain EA27) exhibiting norfloxacin efflux and the mutant EAEP294, which does not express AcrA were used [16], [21]. Bacteria were routinely grown in Luria Bertani (LB) or Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth at 37°C. The strain EA EP294 was grown in the presence of 50 µg/ml kanamycin.

Antibiotic susceptibility tests

Susceptibility to imipenem, cefepime, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, chloramphenicol and tetracycline was determined by the broth dilution method, as previously described [16] and according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (http://www.clsi.org) and Comite de l'Antibiogramme de la SFM (http://www.sfm.asso.fr/nouv/general.phppa2). For the determination of MICs, approximately 106 cells were inoculated into 1 ml MH broth containing twofold serial dilutions of each antibiotic. Results were read after 18 h at 37°C. The efflux pump inhibitor (EPI) phenylalanine-arginine ß-naphthylamide, PAßN [22], was used as previously described [24]. In this study, a fixed concentration of 26.3 µg/ml of EPI was selected for testing clinical isolates. The MIC was the lowest concentration of the antimicrobial agent at which no growth was detected and resistance was defined as previously described [10], [13]. For chloramphenicol MIC≤8 corresponds to susceptible phenotype, 8chloramphenicol breakpoint is proposed for E. aerogenes and Enterobacter spp by specific committee (European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System, http://www.rivm.nl/earss/; European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, http://www.srga.org/eucastwt/WT_EUCAST.htm). An efflux pump activity was identified when the PAßN addition induced a three fold decrease in MIC value for an antibiotic molecule [24], [29].

Epidemiological typing

E. aerogenes typing was carried out by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with a CHEF-Mapper system (Bio-Rad France) as previously described [53]. Briefly, the E. aerogenes chromosomal DNA was digested with the restriction enzyme Xba I. Electrophoresis was performed for 22 hours with a pulsed time ranging from 1 to 50 s. Forty four clinical isolates from these two collections along with two clinical strains previously isolated, EA27 and EA3 [15], and the two EA ATCC strains 13048 and 15038 were studied for PFGE profile comparison.

Measurement of chloramphenicol accumulation

Measurement of 14C chloramphenicol accumulation by intact cells has been described previously [13], [24]. Exponential-phase bacteria grown in LB broth were pelleted, washed once, and resuspended to a density of 1010 CFU/ml in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH7, containing 5 mM magnesium chloride. To de-energize the bacteria and block the efflux process, 50 µM carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) was added 10 minutes before the radio-labelled chloramphenicol. Samples removed at set intervals were filtered and washed. The filters were dried and radioactivity was measured in a Packard scintillation counter.

SDS-PAGE and immunodetection of AcrA

Exponential-phase bacteria in LB broth were pelleted and solubilized in boiling buffer at 96°C as described elsewhere [10], [13], [16]. Samples (amount corresponding to 0.02 optical density units at 600 nm) were loaded onto SDS-polyacrylamide gels (10% polyacrylamide, 0.1% SDS), then electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membranes [16]. Membranes were probed with antibodies raised against AcrA [33] (1∶50,000 dilution). Immunoreactive proteins were visualized with alkaline phosphatase -conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies [13], [16].
  50 in total

1.  Inhibitors of antibiotic efflux pump in resistant Enterobacter aerogenes strains.

Authors:  Monique Malléa; Jacqueline Chevalier; Annie Eyraud; Jean-Marie Pagès
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 2.  Clinically relevant chromosomally encoded multidrug resistance efflux pumps in bacteria.

Authors:  Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Multidrug-resistance efflux pumps - not just for resistance.

Authors:  Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 4.  Multidrug resistance in enteric and other gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  A M George
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Successive emergence of Enterobacter aerogenes strains resistant to imipenem and colistin in a patient.

Authors:  Aurélie Thiolas; Claude Bollet; Bernard La Scola; Didier Raoult; Jean-Marie Pagès
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Role of the CmeABC efflux pump in the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter under selection pressure.

Authors:  Meiguan Yan; Orhan Sahin; Jun Lin; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  AcrAB Efflux System: Expression and Contribution to Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Klebsiella spp.

Authors:  Annarita Mazzariol; Jessica Zuliani; Giuseppe Cornaglia; Gian Maria Rossolini; Roberta Fontana
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Epidemiological study of an outbreak due to multidrug-resistant Enterobacter aerogenes in a medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  C Arpin; C Coze; A M Rogues; J P Gachie; C Bebear; C Quentin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Chloramphenicol and expression of multidrug efflux pump in Enterobacter aerogenes.

Authors:  Didier Ghisalberti; Muriel Masi; Jean-Marie Pagès; Jacqueline Chevalier
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  TEM derivative-producing Enterobacter aerogenes strains: dissemination of a prevalent clone.

Authors:  P Dumarche; C De Champs; D Sirot; C Chanal; R Bonnet; J Sirot
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Efflux-mediated drug resistance in bacteria: an update.

Authors:  Xian-Zhi Li; Hiroshi Nikaido
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  The challenge of efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Xian-Zhi Li; Patrick Plésiat; Hiroshi Nikaido
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nikaido; Jean-Marie Pagès
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 4.  Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens.

Authors:  David M P De Oliveira; Brian M Forde; Timothy J Kidd; Patrick N A Harris; Mark A Schembri; Scott A Beatson; David L Paterson; Mark J Walker
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Occurrence of efflux mechanism and cephalosporinase variant in a population of Enterobacter aerogenes and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases.

Authors:  Que-Tien Tran; Myrielle Dupont; Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Jacqueline Chevalier; Jean-Marie Pagès; Albert Sotto; Anne Davin-Regli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In Vivo Evolution of Bacterial Resistance in Two Cases of Enterobacter aerogenes Infections during Treatment with Imipenem.

Authors:  Nadège Philippe; Laure Maigre; Sébastien Santini; Elizabeth Pinet; Jean-Michel Claverie; Anne-Véronique Davin-Régli; Jean-Marie Pagès; Muriel Masi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Enterobacter aerogenes and Enterobacter cloacae; versatile bacterial pathogens confronting antibiotic treatment.

Authors:  Anne Davin-Regli; Jean-Marie Pagès
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Editorial: Alternative Therapeutics against MDR Bacteria - "Fighting the Epidemic of Antibiotic Resistance".

Authors:  Marta Martins; Matthew P McCusker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  New antibiotic molecules: bypassing the membrane barrier of gram negative bacteria increases the activity of peptide deformylase inhibitors.

Authors:  Laurent Mamelli; Sylvain Petit; Jacqueline Chevalier; Carmela Giglione; Aurélie Lieutaud; Thierry Meinnel; Isabelle Artaud; Jean-Marie Pagès
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Efflux pump, the masked side of beta-lactam resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Pages; Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Véronique Leflon-Guibout; Estelle Marcon; Frédéric Bert; Latifa Noussair; Marie-Hélène Nicolas-Chanoine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.