Literature DB >> 18782745

Extreme sequential polyandry insures against nest failure in a frog.

Phillip G Byrne1, J Scott Keogh.   

Abstract

Sequential polyandry may evolve as an insurance mechanism to reduce the risk of choosing a mate that is infertile, closely related, genetically inferior or incompatible, but polyandry also might insure against nest failure in unpredictable environments. Most animals are oviparous, and in species where males provide nest sites whose quality varies substantially and unpredictably, polyandrous females might insure offspring success by distributing their eggs across multiple nests. Here, we test this hypothesis in a wild population of an Australian terrestrial toadlet, a polyandrous species, where males construct nests and remain with broods. We found that females partitioned their eggs across the nests of two to eight males and that more polyandrous females gained a significant increase in mean offspring survivorship. Our results provide evidence for the most extreme case of sequential polyandry yet discovered in a vertebrate and also suggest that insurance against nest failure might favour the evolution of polyandry. We propose that insurance against nest failure might be widespread among oviparous taxa and provide an important explanation for the prevalence of sequential polyandry in nature.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18782745      PMCID: PMC2614246          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

Review 1.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

2.  Cryptic female choice: frogs reduce clutch size when amplexed by undesired males.

Authors:  H U Reyer; G Frei; C Som
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

Review 5.  Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review.

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds.

Authors:  Donald Blomqvist; Malte Andersson; Clemens Küpper; Innes C Cuthill; János Kis; Richard B Lanctot; Brett K Sandercock; Tamás Székely; Johan Wallander; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Males call more from wetter nests: effects of substrate water potential on reproductive behaviours of terrestrial toadlets.

Authors:  N J Mitchell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Male-by-female interactions influence fertilization success and mediate the benefits of polyandry in the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Can females gain extra paternal investment by mating with multiple males? A game theoretic approach.

Authors:  J Soltis; R McElreath
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild.

Authors:  Diana O Fisher; Michael C Double; Simon P Blomberg; Michael D Jennions; Andrew Cockburn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Modes of response to environmental change and the elusive empirical evidence for bet hedging.

Authors:  Andrew M Simons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection.

Authors:  Stephen M Shuster; William R Briggs; Patricia A Dennis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Body size mediates social and environmental effects on nest building behaviour in a fish with paternal care.

Authors:  Topi K Lehtonen; Kai Lindström; Bob B M Wong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Genetic evidence for polyandry in the threatened green and golden bell frog.

Authors:  Chad T Beranek; John Clulow; Michael Mahony
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Indiscriminate males: mating behaviour of a marine snail compromised by a sexual conflict?

Authors:  Kerstin Johannesson; Sara H Saltin; Iris Duranovic; Jon N Havenhand; Per R Jonsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Experimental evolution of bet hedging under manipulated environmental uncertainty in Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Graham; Myron L Smith; Andrew M Simons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The female perspective of mating in A. femoralis, a territorial frog with paternal care--a spatial and genetic analysis.

Authors:  Eva Ringler; Max Ringler; Robert Jehle; Walter Hödl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Brood-partitioning behaviour in unpredictable environments: hedging the bets?

Authors:  Magdalena Erich; Max Ringler; Walter Hödl; Eva Ringler
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Courting disaster: How diversification rate affects fitness under risk.

Authors:  William C Ratcliff; Peter Hawthorne; Eric Libby
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Low reproductive skew despite high male-biased operational sex ratio in a glass frog with paternal care.

Authors:  Alexandra Mangold; Katharina Trenkwalder; Max Ringler; Walter Hödl; Eva Ringler
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.