Literature DB >> 17080089

Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild.

Diana O Fisher1, Michael C Double, Simon P Blomberg, Michael D Jennions, Andrew Cockburn.   

Abstract

Females often mate with several males before producing offspring. Field studies of vertebrates suggest, and laboratory experiments on invertebrates confirm, that even when males provide no material benefits, polyandry can enhance offspring survival. This enhancement is widely attributed to genetic benefits that arise whenever paternity is biased towards males that sire more viable offspring. Field studies suggest that post-mating sexual selection biases fertilization towards genetically more compatible males and one controlled experiment has shown that, when females mate with close kin, polyandry reduces the relative number of inbred offspring. Another potential genetic benefit of polyandry is that it increases offspring survival because males with more competitive ejaculates sire more viable offspring. Surprisingly, however, there is no unequivocal evidence for this process. Here, by experimentally assigning mates to females, we show that polyandry greatly increases offspring survival in the Australian marsupial Antechinus stuartii. DNA profiling shows that males that gain high paternity under sperm competition sire offspring that are more viable. This beneficial effect occurs in both the laboratory and the wild. Crucially, there are no confounding non-genetic maternal effects that could arise if polyandry increases female investment in a particular reproductive event because A. stuartii is effectively semelparous. Our results therefore show that polyandry improves female lifetime fitness in nature. The threefold increase in offspring survival is not negated by a decline in maternal lifespan and is too large to be offset by an equivalent decline in the reproductive performance of surviving offspring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17080089     DOI: 10.1038/nature05206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  39 in total

1.  The influence of maternal effects on indirect benefits associated with polyandry.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; Bronwyn H Bleakley; Craig A Walling; Thomas A R Price; Clare E Stamper; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Convenience polyandry or convenience polygyny? Costly sex under female control in a promiscuous primate.

Authors:  Elise Huchard; Cindy I Canale; Chloé Le Gros; Martine Perret; Pierre-Yves Henry; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Selfish genetic elements and sexual selection: their impact on male fertility.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 4.  Boom and bust: a review of the physiology of the marsupial genus Antechinus.

Authors:  R Naylor; S J Richardson; B M McAllan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh; David W Zeh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Consistent male-male paternity differences across female genotypes.

Authors:  Craig D H Sherman; Erik Wapstra; Mats Olsson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Live fast, die young, and win the sperm competition.

Authors:  F Stephen Dobson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sperm competition drives the evolution of suicidal reproduction in mammals.

Authors:  Diana O Fisher; Christopher R Dickman; Menna E Jones; Simon P Blomberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Extreme sequential polyandry insures against nest failure in a frog.

Authors:  Phillip G Byrne; J Scott Keogh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Quantitative genetic correlation between trait and preference supports a sexually selected sperm process.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Janne S Kotiaho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.