Literature DB >> 18781214

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the updated McMaster University experience.

Jihao Dong1, Jaime Wong, Ahmad Al-Enezi, Anil Kapoor, J Paul Whelan, Kevin Piercey, Edward D Matsumoto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The open Anderson-Hynes procedure has an overall success rate of 90% for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) was developed to reduce morbidity and hospital stay while preserving the excellent results. We report on the results of our experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
METHODS: Between January 2001 and May 2006, 77 consecutive patients underwent LP performed by one of 4 surgeons at our institution. Patients were reassessed with ultrasound (U/S) or intravenous pyelogram (IVP) at 6 weeks. Diuretic renal scan and U/S or IVP were performed at 6 months, and subsequent follow-up included a U/S or IVP as well as clinical assessment. Patients were assessed for pain and hydronephrosis on radiologic imaging, clearance on diuretic renal scan (T(1/2)) and differential renal function.
RESULTS: We evaluated 73 patients. The mean patient age was 38 years (range 16-71 yr), the mean operating time was 218 minutes (range 110-409 min), and the mean blood loss was 57 mL (range 25-250 mL). Mean hospital stay was 3.0 days (range 2-7 d). The success rate was 90.4%, and failures were mainly due to poor function after surgery (3 patients). Pyelolithotomy was performed concomitantly on 6 patients, which on average extended operative time by 36 minutes.
CONCLUSION: Our success rates are consistent with the LP experience of other centres and are comparable with rates for the open technique. Patients had short hospital stays, and complications were negligible. With experienced surgeons, LP should be the first-line treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18781214      PMCID: PMC2532550          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  22 in total

1.  Robotic pyeloplasty: technique and results.

Authors:  Reinhard Peschel; Richard Neururer; Georg Bartsch; Matthew T Gettman
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status.

Authors:  Takeshi Inagaki; Koon H Rha; Albert M Ong; Louis R Kavoussi; Thomas W Jarrett
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Dismembered percutaneous endopyeloplasty: a new procedure.

Authors:  David S Sharp; Mihir M Desai; Wilson R Molina; Massimiliano Spaliviero; Sidney C Abreu; Anup P Ramani; Jihad H Kaouk; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty using endoscopic GIA stapler for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Hidemori Araki; Yoshinari Ono; Ryohei Hattori; Momokazu Goto; Tokunori Yamamoto; Toru Kimura; Shinichi Ohshima
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.

Authors:  W W Schuessler; M T Grune; L V Tecuanhuey; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Long-term results and late recurrence after endoureteropyelotomy: a critical analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  P J Van Cangh; J F Wilmart; R J Opsomer; A Abi-Aad; F X Wese; F Lorge
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Adult endopyelotomy: impact of etiology and antegrade versus retrograde approach on outcome.

Authors:  A L Shalhav; G Giusti; A M Elbahnasy; D M Hoenig; E M McDougall; D S Smith; K L Maxwell; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Mihir M Desai; Mahesh R Desai; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Abdullatif Hussain; Paul Whelan; Kevin Piercey; Anil Kapoor
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.344

10.  Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: review of 50 consecutive cases.

Authors:  B A Kletscher; J W Segura; A J LeRoy; D E Patterson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Is confirmation of ureteric stent placement in laparoscopic pyeloplasty necessary?

Authors:  D B Hennessey; N J Kinnear; R M Evans; C Hagan; A Thwaini
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Current trends in minimally invasive reconstructive urology.

Authors:  I Belibasakis; G Kolostoumpis; K Makrygiannaki
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-11-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.