Literature DB >> 15474600

Robotic pyeloplasty: technique and results.

Reinhard Peschel1, Richard Neururer, Georg Bartsch, Matthew T Gettman.   

Abstract

The da Vinci robotic system can be used to perform dismembered and nondismembered pyeloplasty techniques effectively. Robotics not only seems to improve dexterity and surgical precision but also provides an ergonomic surgical environment for a surgeon performing complex reconstructive procedures such as pyeloplasty. Although performance-enhancing features of the da Vinci robot seem to decrease the difficulty of intracorporeal suturing, a learning curve also exists for telerobotic procedures. This learning curve may decrease as experience with telerobotics increases and as advances in technology are introduced. Presently, the interaction between the primary and assistant surgeon seems crucial to the success of the procedure. Although the early clinical experience with robotic pyeloplasty is favorable, continuing clinical evaluation and careful follow-up are required to determine if the procedure is as efficacious in the long run as open pyeloplasty and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15474600     DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2004.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  8 in total

1.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute training experience.

Authors:  Ketan K Badani; Ashok K Hemal; James O Peabody; Mani Menon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Pathophysiology and treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Brent Williams; Basir Tareen; Martin I Resnick
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Richard E Link; Sam B Bhayani; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Robotic surgery for treatment of chyluria.

Authors:  Naman Barman; Michael Palese
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-02-09

5.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the updated McMaster University experience.

Authors:  Jihao Dong; Jaime Wong; Ahmad Al-Enezi; Anil Kapoor; J Paul Whelan; Kevin Piercey; Edward D Matsumoto
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.862

6. 

Authors:  Jeff Warren; Vitor da Silva; Yves Caumartin; Patrick P W Luke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Defining the pros and cons of open, conventional laparoscopy, and robot-assisted pyeloplasty in a developing nation.

Authors:  Mrinal Pahwa; Archna R Pahwa; Mohit Girotra; Rtika Ryfka Abrahm; Sachin Kathuria; Ajay Sharma
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2014-02-02

Review 8.  Applications of robots in urology.

Authors:  Rahul Thaly; Ketul Shah; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2007-02-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.