Literature DB >> 7861513

Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: review of 50 consecutive cases.

B A Kletscher1, J W Segura, A J LeRoy, D E Patterson.   

Abstract

Between 1988 and 1993, 50 percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomies were performed for ureteropelvic junction obstruction at this institution. The success of the procedure was based on radiological parameters as well as patient symptomatology. The overall success rate of the procedure was 88%. Endopyelotomy was successful in 9 of 11 patients (82%) who presented after failing previous renal procedures. When endopyelotomy was used as the initial treatment modality the success rate was 90%. These results support the argument that endopyelotomy should be considered as first line therapy for most adults with ureteropelvic junction obstructions [corrected].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7861513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

Review 1.  Antegrade percutaneous endopyelotomy.

Authors:  Raymond Ko; Mordechai Duvdevani; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years.

Authors:  Punit Bansal; Aman Gupta; Ritesh Mongha; Srinivas Narayan; Ranjit K Das; Malay Bera; Sudip C Chakraborty; Anup K Kundu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Endopyelotomy - a Minimally Invasive Surgical Option for Pelvi-ureteric Junction Obstruction: a Study Of 34 Cases.

Authors:  A A Pradhan; Rajeev Sood; P Madhusoodanan; A S Sandhu; S K Gupta; Anil Kumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  The Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  Bruce L Jacobs; Julie C Lai; Rachana Seelam; Janet M Hanley; J Stuart Wolf; Brent K Hollenbeck; John M Hollingsworth; Andrew W Dick; Claude M Setodji; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Robotic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the updated McMaster University experience.

Authors:  Jihao Dong; Jaime Wong; Ahmad Al-Enezi; Anil Kapoor; J Paul Whelan; Kevin Piercey; Edward D Matsumoto
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Laparoscopic reconstructive urology.

Authors:  Declan Murphy; Ben Challacombe; Abhay Rane
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 8.  Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults.

Authors:  Fahd Khan; Kamran Ahmed; Nikiesha Lee; Ben Challacombe; Mohammed S Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Laparoscopic treatment of ovarian vein syndrome.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Yair Lotan; Jeffrey Cadeddu
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches -- a single centre experience of three years.

Authors:  Punit Bansal; Aman Gupta; Ritesh Mongha; Srinivas Narayan; A K Kundu; S C Chakraborty; R K Das; M K Bera
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.