Literature DB >> 15602303

Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and preferences.

Linda E Moody1, Elaine Slocumb, Bruce Berg, Donna Jackson.   

Abstract

A descriptive study of 100 nursing personnel at a large Magnet hospital in Southwest Florida was conducted to assess their needs, preferences, and perceptions associated with Electronic Health Record (EHR) documentation methods. Nurses' attitudes about the use of EHRs and their perceived effects on patient care were assessed. The five-item, Likert-type attitude scale explained 54% of the variance in attitude scores and demonstrated sound construct validity and internal consistency (r = 0.77). More than one third, 36%, perceived that EHRs had resulted in a decreased workload. The majority of nurses, 64%, preferred bedside documentation but reported that environmental and system barriers often prevent EHR charting at the bedside. Overall, 75% of nurses thought EHRs had improved the quality of documentation and 76% believed electronic charting would lead to improved safety and patient care. Nurses with expertise in computer use, 80%, had a more favorable attitude toward EHRs than those with less expertise. Results have been used to implement clinical system changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15602303     DOI: 10.1097/00024665-200411000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs        ISSN: 1538-2931            Impact factor:   1.985


  40 in total

1.  Evaluation of computerized physician order entry system-a satisfaction survey in Taiwan.

Authors:  Bey-Hwa Yui; Wai-Tim Jim; Marcelo Chen; Jong-Ming Hsu; Chieh-Yu Liu; Ting-Ting Lee
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  A formative and summative evaluation of an electronic health record in community nursing.

Authors:  Diane Doran; Lawrence S Bloomberg; Cheryl Reid-Haughian; Joseph Cafazzo
Journal:  NI 2012 (2012)       Date:  2012-06-23

3.  Norwegian hospital nurses' satisfaction with the electronic patient record and associations with informational continuity during shift changes.

Authors:  Ragnhild Hellesø; Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne
Journal:  NI 2012 (2012)       Date:  2012-06-23

4.  Registered nurses' use of electronic health records: findings from a national survey.

Authors:  Catherine DesRoches; Karen Donelan; Peter Buerhaus; Li Zhonghe
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-07-15

5.  Using Electronic Health Records for Quality Measurement and Accountability in Care of the Seriously Ill: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Seelwan Sathitratanacheewin; Helene Starks; Robert Y Lee; Erin K Kross; Lois Downey; James Sibley; William Lober; Elizabeth T Loggers; James A Fausto; Charlotta Lindvall; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Electronic health records: what are the most important barriers?

Authors:  Haleh Ayatollahi; Nader Mirani; Hamid Haghani
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2014-10-01

7.  Challenges and facilitators to adoption of a point-of-care electronic health record in home care.

Authors:  Paulina S Sockolow; Kathryn H Bowles; Marguerite C Adelsberger; Jesse L Chittams; Cindy Liao
Journal:  Home Health Care Serv Q       Date:  2014

8.  Differences in Sociocognitive Beliefs between Involved and Noninvolved Employees during the Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System.

Authors:  Nicola Esther Stanczyk; Rik Crutzen; Nikki Sewuster; Elwin Schotanus; Merijn Mulders; Henricus Paul Cremers
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2017-04-01

9.  Advice for Decision Makers Based on an Electronic Health Record Evaluation at a Program for All-inclusive Care for Elders Site.

Authors:  P S Sockolow; J P Weiner; K H Bowles; P Abbott; H P Lehmann
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.342

10.  Evaluating how electronic charting affects resident productivity.

Authors:  Daniel Henning; Steven Horng; Leon Sanchez
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.