Literature DB >> 17035341

How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence.

Ashish K Jha1, Timothy G Ferris, Karen Donelan, Catherine DesRoches, Alexandra Shields, Sara Rosenbaum, David Blumenthal.   

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) are promising tools to improve quality and efficiency in health care, but data on their adoption rate are limited. We identified surveys on EHR adoption and assessed their quality. Although surveys returned widely different estimates of EHR use, when available information is limited to studies of high or medium quality, national estimates are possible: Through 2005, approximately 23.9 percent of physicians used EHRs in the ambulatory setting, while 5 percent of hospitals used computerized physician order entry. Large gaps in knowledge, including information about EHR use among safety-net providers, pose critical challenges for the development of policies aimed at speeding adoption.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17035341     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  76 in total

1.  Study of the cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical record systems in general hospital in China.

Authors:  Kai Li; Shinji Naganawa; Kai Wang; Ping Li; Ken Kato; Xiu Li; Jie Zhang; Kazunobu Yamauchi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Hospital characteristics related to the intention to apply for meaningful use incentive payments.

Authors:  Mark L Diana; Abby Swanson Kazley; Eric W Ford; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-04-01

3.  Racial differences in the usage of information technology: evidence from a national physician survey.

Authors:  Doohee Lee; Phil Rutsohn
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-04-01

4.  Toward an effective strategy for the diffusion and use of clinical information systems.

Authors:  Stephen M Davidson; Janelle Heineke
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A cluster-randomized trial of a primary care informatics-based system for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Richard W Grant; William T Lester; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Yuchiao Chang; Michael J Barry; Henry C Chueh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Designing a model health care system.

Authors:  Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Electronic health record functionality needed to better support primary care.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; John W Beasley; Jesse C Crosson; David C Kibbe; Michael S Klinkman; Christoph U Lehmann; Chester H Fox; Jason M Mitchell; James W Mold; Wilson D Pace; Kevin A Peterson; Robert L Phillips; Robert Post; Jon Puro; Michael Raddock; Ray Simkus; Steven E Waldren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  An Academic-Industry Collaboration to Develop an EHR Module for Primary Care.

Authors:  Jacqueline Halladay; Christopher M Shea; David Reed; Timothy P Daaleman
Journal:  Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-02-16

9.  Community-wide implementation of health information technology: the Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative experience.

Authors:  Allan H Goroll; Steven R Simon; Micky Tripathi; Carl Ascenzo; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Physician reminders to promote surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal adenomas: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John Z Ayanian; Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard S Johannes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.