Literature DB >> 20046856

Linking speech errors and phonological grammars: Insights from Harmonic Grammar networks.

Matthew Goldrick1, Robert Daland.   

Abstract

Phonological grammars characterize distinctions between relatively well-formed (unmarked) and relatively ill-formed (marked) phonological structures. We review evidence that markedness influences speech error probabilities. Specifically, although errors result in both unmarked as well as marked structures, there is a markedness asymmetry: errors are more likely to produce unmarked outcomes. We show that stochastic disruption to the computational mechanisms realizing a Harmonic Grammar (HG) can account for the broad empirical patterns of speech errors. We demonstrate that our proposal can account for the general markedness asymmetry. We also develop methods for linking particular HG proposals to speech error distributions, and illustrate these methods using a simple HG and a set of initial consonant errors in English.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20046856      PMCID: PMC2789494          DOI: 10.1017/S0952675709001742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phonology        ISSN: 0952-6757


  25 in total

1.  Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Jonna Armbruster; Shinying Chu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Phonological primitives: electromyographic speech error evidence.

Authors:  R A Mowrey; I R MacKay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speaking words: Contributions of cognitive neuropsychological research.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: achievements, limitations, and alternatives.

Authors:  A S Meyer
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-03

5.  Learning artificial phonotactic constraints: time course, durability, and relationship to natural constraints.

Authors:  Conrad F Taylor; George Houghton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Tongue kinematics during utterances elicited with the SLIP technique.

Authors:  Marianne Pouplier
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-02-17

8.  Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization.

Authors:  Colin Wilson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-09-10

9.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.

Authors:  J J Hopfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Limits on learning phonotactic constraints from recent production experience.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Gary S Dell; Christine A Whalen; Samantha Gereg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  3 in total

1.  Training Pseudoword Reading in Acquired Dyslexia: A Phonological Complexity Approach.

Authors:  Ellyn A Riley; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.773

2.  Phonology without universal grammar.

Authors:  Diana Archangeli; Douglas Pulleyblank
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-04

3.  Rules from words: a dynamic neural basis for a lawful linguistic process.

Authors:  David W Gow; A Conrad Nied
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.