Literature DB >> 18761513

The great ambivalence: factors likely to affect service user and public acceptability of the pharmacogenomics of antidepressant medication.

Michael Barr1, Diana Rose.   

Abstract

Whilst antidepressant medications are widely used, they are ineffective for nearly 40 per cent of users and cause numerous adverse drug reactions. The pharmacogenomics of depression attempts to better understand the role of genetic variation in antidepressant metabolism in the hope of improving drug efficacy and tolerability. In this paper we present findings from a series of focus groups with the general public and with mental health service users in four European sites. Results indicate broad support for genome-based therapies for depression. Findings, however, also show a wide spread of ambivalence regarding the nature and causes of depression, as well as the use of antidepressant medication. We argue that these uncertainties may negatively impact public and user acceptability of the pharmacogenomics of antidepressants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18761513     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01116.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  10 in total

Review 1.  Close to the bench as well as at the bedside: involving service users in all phases of translational research.

Authors:  Felicity Callard; Diana Rose; Til Wykes
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Opinions, hopes and concerns regarding pharmacogenomics: a comparison of healthy individuals, heart failure patients and heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  K Lachance; S Korol; E O'Meara; A Ducharme; N Racine; M Liszkowski; J L Rouleau; G B Pelletier; M Carrier; M White; S de Denus
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Neurobiological narratives: experiences of mood disorder through the lens of neuroimaging.

Authors:  Daniel Z Buchman; Emily L Borgelt; Louise Whiteley; Judy Illes
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2012-05-03

Review 4.  Patient and public understanding of the concept of 'personalised medicine' in relation to cancer treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jed Botham; Valerie Shilling; John Jones
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-11

5.  Understanding the barriers and enablers of pharmacogenomic testing in primary care: a qualitative systematic review with meta-aggregation synthesis.

Authors:  Sadaf Qureshi; Asam Latif; Laura Condon; Ralph K Akyea; Joe Kai; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.638

6.  Managing Expectational Language: Translational genetic professionals consider the clinical potential of next-generation sequencing technologies.

Authors:  Pei P Koay; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2014-06-01

7.  Taking part in a pharmacogenetic clinical trial: assessment of trial participants understanding of information disclosed during the informed consent process.

Authors:  Diana Rose; Jasna Russo; Til Wykes
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Holding blame at bay? 'Gene talk' in family members' accounts of schizophrenia aetiology.

Authors:  Felicity Callard; Diana Rose; Emma-Louise Hanif; Jody Quigley; Kathryn Greenwood; Til Wykes
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2012-09-03

9.  Utilizing social media to study information-seeking and ethical issues in gene therapy.

Authors:  Julie M Robillard; Louise Whiteley; Thomas Wade Johnson; Jonathan Lim; Wyeth W Wasserman; Judy Illes
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Service users' and carers' views on research towards stratified medicine in psychiatry: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Diana Rose; Constantina Papoulias; James MacCabe; Jennifer Walke
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-09-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.