Literature DB >> 21615638

Close to the bench as well as at the bedside: involving service users in all phases of translational research.

Felicity Callard1, Diana Rose, Til Wykes.   

Abstract

AIM: The paper aims to develop a model of translational research in which service user and other stakeholder involvement are central to each phase.
BACKGROUND: 'Translational' is the current medical buzzword: translational research has been termed 'bench to bedside' research and promises to fast-track biomedical advances in the service of patient benefit. Models usually conceive of translational research as a 'pipeline' that is divided into phases: the early phase is characterized as the province of basic scientists and laboratory-based clinical researchers; the later phases focus on the implementation, dissemination and diffusion of health applications. If service user involvement is mentioned, it is usually restricted to these later phases.
METHODS: The paper critically reviews existing literature on translational research and medicine. The authors develop a theoretical argument that addresses why a reconceptualization of translational research is required on scientific, ethical and pragmatic grounds.
RESULTS: The authors reconceptualize the model of translational research as an interlocking loop rather than as a pipeline, one in which service user and other stakeholder involvement feed into each of its elements. The authors demonstrate that for the 'interlocking loop' model of translational research to be materialized in practice will require changes in how health research is structured and organized.
CONCLUSION: The authors demonstrate the scientific, ethical and pragmatic benefits of involving service users in every phase of translational research. The authors' reconceptualized model of translational research contributes to theoretical and policy debates regarding both translational research and service user involvement.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21615638      PMCID: PMC5060629          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00681.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  44 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Translational medicine: can it really facilitate the transition of research "from bench to bedside"?

Authors:  Martin Wehling
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  The prospects for "personalized medicine" in drug development and drug therapy.

Authors:  J Woodcock
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research?

Authors:  J Francisca Caron-Flinterman; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Joske F G Bunders
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  What patients want: consumer involvement in the design of a randomized controlled trial of routine oxygen supplementation after acute stroke.

Authors:  Khalid Ali; Christine Roffe; Peter Crome
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Prioritizing research: Patients, carers, and clinicians working together to identify and prioritize important clinical uncertainties in urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Brian S Buckley; Adrian M Grant; Douglas G Tincello; Adrian S Wagg; Lester Firkins
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study.

Authors:  Rosemary Telford; Jonathan D Boote; Cindy L Cooper
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Goal achievement as a patient-generated outcome measure for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jill L Milne; Magali Robert; Selphee Tang; Neil Drummond; Sue Ross
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: consumer involvement in design of new randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Liedeke Koops; Richard I Lindley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-24

10.  Translational Medicine: A two-way road.

Authors:  Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  44 in total

1.  Editorial.

Authors:  Jonathan Tritter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  What Do Patients Want? Patient Preference in Wound Care.

Authors:  Lisa Q Corbett; William J Ennis
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Type 2 translational research for CKD.

Authors:  Katherine R Tuttle; Delphine S Tuot; Cynthia L Corbett; Stephen M Setter; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  The Benefits of Patient Involvement for Translational Research.

Authors:  Lieke van der Scheer; Elisa Garcia; Anna Laura van der Laan; Simone van der Burg; Marianne Boenink
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2017-09

5.  Challenges and Benefits in Designing and Implementing a Team-Based Research Mentorship Experience in Translational Research.

Authors:  Belinda-Rose Young; Heather J Williamson; Donna L Burton; Oliver Thomas Massey; Bruce Lubotsky Levin; Julie A Baldwin
Journal:  Pedagogy Health Promot       Date:  2015-12-01

6.  Engaging Patients and Other Non-Researchers in Health Research: Defining Research Engagement.

Authors:  Lori Frank; Sally C Morton; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Janet Jull; Thomas W Concannon; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Great expectations for participatory research: what have we achieved in the last ten years?

Authors:  Til Wykes
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 49.548

8.  'A limpet on a ship': Spatio-temporal dynamics of patient and public involvement in research.

Authors:  Stan Constantina Papoulias; Felicity Callard
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Configuring the patient as clinical research subject in the UK national health service.

Authors:  Mary Adams; Christopher McKevitt
Journal:  Anthropol Med       Date:  2015-03-13

10.  Service users' and carers' views on research towards stratified medicine in psychiatry: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Diana Rose; Constantina Papoulias; James MacCabe; Jennifer Walke
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.