Literature DB >> 18760078

Fracture healing. The evolution of our understanding.

Stephan M Perren1.   

Abstract

Our understanding of fracture healing has undergone an evolution over many decades with continuous improvement of fracture treatment. Solid union is a precondition of restoring the function of a fractured bone. The goal of the early treatment of the fracture was focussed upon enabling solid union in acceptable alignment of the fracture. This was achieved with reduction followed by application of external splints. The function of the articulations was often troubled by long lasting and extensive external immobilization, which required physiotherapy that lasted longer than bone union. The surgical reduction and stabilization aimed at early recovery of movement of the articulations and maintenance of the function of the soft tissues and blood supply. The AO group initiated 1958 by Maurice E. Müller and his colleagues prioritized the recovery of limb function and propagated precise reduction and fixation using mainly compression. Absolute stability of fixation, achieved using implants, allowed to move the articulations very early without pain, while the fracture united solidly. After such treatment the implants could not be removed before 1 1/2 to 2 years without risking increased incidence of re-fracture. This was in sharp contrast to the fact that after conservative treatment the bone was solidly united after 2 to 3 months. The analysis of this situation revealed that internal remodelling after absolutely stable fixation did not recognize the presence of the fracture. Primary healing, therefore, is not a healing in the strict sense of the word but a side effect of internal removal of necrotic bone. To maintain early function of the limb and stimulate the healing process the so called biological internal fixation was developed. It combines minimal surgical trauma, acceptable rather than precise reduction and flexible fixation usually achieved with so called internal fixateurs. Flexibility of mind and of tools aims at safe and early healing with full recovery of function and minimal risk of biological complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18760078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech        ISSN: 0001-5415            Impact factor:   0.531


  14 in total

1.  Wedge volume and osteotomy surface depend on surgical technique for high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Dietrich Pape; Klaus Dueck; Manuel Haag; Olaf Lorbach; Romain Seil; Henning Madry
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Wedge volume and osteotomy surface depend on surgical technique for distal femoral osteotomy.

Authors:  Ronald van Heerwaarden; Michael Najfeld; Martijn Brinkman; Romain Seil; Henning Madry; Dietrich Pape
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates].

Authors:  M Hanschen; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Osteotomy techniques close to the knee. Effect on wedge volume and bony contact surface].

Authors:  D Pape; R van Heerwaarden; M Haag; R Seil; H Madry
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Improved Achilles tendon healing by early mechanical loading in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Jihong Wang; Dianming Jiang; Shuzheng Wen; Shangfei Jing; Dongsheng Fan; Zengtao Hao; Chaoqian Han
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

6.  Full weight bearing and dynamisation with Limmed® locked plate fixation accelerates bone regeneration in the volume of opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Charles Flouzat Lachaniette; Jerome Delambre; Isaac Guissou; Omar Dahmani; Mohamed Ibrahim Ouali; Alexandre Poignard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Play and players in bone fracture healing match.

Authors:  Lorenzo Marzona; Bernardo Pavolini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-05

8.  [Therapy of humeral shaft fractures].

Authors:  P C Strohm; D C Kubosch; E J Hübner; N P Südkamp; M Jaeger; K Reising
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Reamed versus unreamed nail in the treatment of tibia shaft fractures.

Authors:  J Trlica; J Kočí; P Lochman; K Šmejkal; M Frank; T Holeček; L Hasenöhrlová; J Zahradníček; J Folvarský; I Žvák; T Dědek
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  A useful surgical strategy for proximal tibial fractures (AO/OTA type 41-C) with diaphyseal involvement.

Authors:  Dankai Wu; Guangkai Reng; Ankit Shrivastava; Ying Yu; Yueyang Zhang; Chuangang Peng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.