Literature DB >> 18755590

A simple method for calibrating force plates and force treadmills using an instrumented pole.

Steven H Collins1, Peter G Adamczyk, Daniel P Ferris, Arthur D Kuo.   

Abstract

We propose a new method for calibrating force plates to reduce errors in center of pressure locations, forces, and moments. These errors may be caused by imperfect mounting of force plates to the ground or by installation of a treadmill atop a force plate, which may introduce distorting loads. The method, termed the Post-Installation Least-Squares (PILS) calibration, combines features of several previous methods into a simple procedure. It requires a motion capture system and an instrumented pole for applying reference loads. Reference loads may be manually applied to the force plate in arbitrary locations and directions. The instrumented pole measures applied load magnitudes through a single-axis load cell, and load directions through motion capture markers. Reference data and imperfect force plate signals are then combined to form a linear calibration matrix that simultaneously minimizes mean square errors in all forces and moments. We applied the procedure to standard laboratory force plates, as well as a custom-built, split-belt force treadmill. We also collected an independent set of verification data for testing. The proposed calibration procedure was found to reduce force errors by over 20%, and moment errors by over 60%. Center of pressure errors were also reduced by 63% for standard force plates and 91% for the force treadmill. The instrumented pole is advantageous because it allows for fast and arbitrary load application without needing a precise fixture for aligning loads. The linear calibration matrix is simpler than nonlinear correction equations and more compatible with standard data acquisition software, yet it yields error reductions comparable to more complex methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18755590      PMCID: PMC2665306          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  15 in total

1.  Parameters influencing the accuracy of the point of force application determined with piezoelectric force plates.

Authors:  H B Schmiedmayer; J Kastner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A treadmill ergometer for three-dimensional ground reaction forces measurement during walking.

Authors:  A Belli; P Bui; A Berger; A Geyssant; J R Lacour
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Variability of ground reaction forces during treadmill walking.

Authors:  Kei Masani; Motoki Kouzaki; Tetsuo Fukunaga
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-05

4.  Optimised procedure for the calibration of the force platform location.

Authors:  M Rabuffetti; M Ferrarin; P Mazzoleni; F Benvenuti; A Pedotti
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  A force measuring treadmill in clinical gait analysis.

Authors:  Frédéric Dierick; Massimo Penta; David Renaut; Christine Detrembleur
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Determining the centre of pressure during walking and running using an instrumented treadmill.

Authors:  G J Verkerke; A L Hof; W Zijlstra; W Ament; G Rakhorst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Patrick O Riley; Gabriele Paolini; Ugo Della Croce; Kate W Paylo; D Casey Kerrigan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Testing of a tri-instrumented-treadmill unit for kinetic analysis of locomotion tasks in static and dynamic loading conditions.

Authors:  Gabriele Paolini; Ugo Della Croce; Patrick O Riley; Frederic K Newton; D Casey Kerrigan
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 2.242

9.  Development of an instrumented pole test for use as a gait laboratory quality check.

Authors:  Andrew Lewis; Caroline Stewart; Neil Postans; Jon Trevelyan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Spot check of the calibrated force platform location.

Authors:  M Rabuffetti; M Ferrarin; F Benvenuti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.079

View more
  31 in total

1.  Removal of movement artifact from high-density EEG recorded during walking and running.

Authors:  Joseph T Gwin; Klaus Gramann; Scott Makeig; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Walking variability during continuous pseudo-random oscillations of the support surface and visual field.

Authors:  Patricia M McAndrew; Jonathan B Dingwell; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Dynamic assessment of center of pressure measurements from an instrumented AMTI treadmill with controlled precision.

Authors:  Emma Fortune; Jeremy Crenshaw; Vipul Lugade; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Changes in mechanical work during neural adaptation to asymmetric locomotion.

Authors:  Brian P Selgrade; Montakan Thajchayapong; Gloria E Lee; Megan E Toney; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Learning to be economical: the energy cost of walking tracks motor adaptation.

Authors:  James M Finley; Amy J Bastian; Jinger S Gottschall
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Mechanical and energetic consequences of rolling foot shape in human walking.

Authors:  Peter G Adamczyk; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Recycling energy to restore impaired ankle function during human walking.

Authors:  Steven H Collins; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mechanics and energetics of load carriage during human walking.

Authors:  Tzu-Wei P Huang; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Invariant ankle moment patterns when walking with and without a robotic ankle exoskeleton.

Authors:  Pei-Chun Kao; Cara L Lewis; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Dynamic arm swinging in human walking.

Authors:  Steven H Collins; Peter G Adamczyk; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.