Literature DB >> 1875438

Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution.

T V Clancy1, K Norman, R Reynolds, D Covington, J G Maxwell.   

Abstract

Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance (TEB) is a method for measuring cardiac performance which is noninvasive, continuous, has minimal technical requirements, and no patient risk. We used a commercially available TEB device to measure cardiac output in patients with thermodilution catheters in place. We compared the cardiac output measurements for the two modalities. We also compared the average hospital cost for initial cardiac assessment using the two techniques. The mean difference between the two cardiac output measurements was small (0.23 +/- 0.56) and not affected by the magnitude of the cardiac output readings. There was a strong correlation between COTD and COTEB (r = 0.91) and the regression slope was 0.91 with a Y intercept of 0.76. Cost analysis demonstrated that the use of TEB was approximately $600 less than thermodilution. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output may offer a valuable alternative to the invasive measurement of the thermodilution catheter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1875438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  10 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The influence of left lateral position on cardiac output changes after head up tilt measured by impedance cardiography.

Authors:  M Kamenik
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  W Spiering; P N van Es; P W de Leeuw
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Continuous non-invasive cardiac output monitoring during exercise: validation of electrical cardiometry with Fick and thermodilution methods.

Authors:  Y H Liu; B P Dhakal; C Keesakul; R M Kacmarek; G D Lewis; Y Jiang
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Cardiac output in patients with acute stroke.

Authors:  J Treib; A Haass; I Krammer; M Stoll; M T Grauer; K Schimrigk
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Aortocaval compression in the sitting and lateral decubitus positions during extradural catheter placement in the parturient.

Authors:  P J Andrews; W E Ackerman; M M Juneja
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Arterial pulse contour analysis trending of cardiac output: hemodynamic manipulations during cerebral arteriovenous malformation resection.

Authors:  C Weissman; E J Ornstein; W L Young
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1993-11

8.  Noninvasive cardiac output measurement by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence: influence of age and gender.

Authors:  Talakad N Sathyaprabha; Cauchy Pradhan; G Rashmi; Kandavel Thennarasu; Trichur R Raju
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Cardiac output assessed by invasive and minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Allison J Lee; Jennifer Hochman Cohn; J Sudharma Ranasinghe
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-06

10.  Evaluation of a model-based hemodynamic monitoring method in a porcine study of septic shock.

Authors:  James A Revie; David Stevenson; J Geoffrey Chase; Chris J Pretty; Bernard C Lambermont; Alexandre Ghuysen; Philippe Kolh; Geoffrey M Shaw; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 2.238

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.