Literature DB >> 18751793

Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 99 patients.

Keith Holley1, Jonathan Zelken, Douglas Padgett, George Chimento, Andrew Yun, Robert Buly.   

Abstract

The medical records and radiographs of 99 patients treated for a periprosthetic femur fracture after total hip arthroplasty over a 17-year period at a single institution were prospectively reviewed. Fractures were classified according to the Vancouver system and stratified as to treatment method. Sixty-six patients had complete records available and a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Overall, 86% of the patients achieved fracture union. The success rate of cemented revision in the B2 and B3 groups was 84%, whereas cement-less revision was 86% successful. The complication rate of surgical treatment was 29%. Fracture union with a stable implant was possible in the majority of cases. Our results support the use of the Vancouver classification as a treatment algorithm.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18751793      PMCID: PMC2504263          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-007-9045-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  26 in total

1.  Periprosthetic fracture of the femur

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Charles L Nelson
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-04

3.  Dall-Miles plating for periprosthetic B1 fractures of the femur.

Authors:  T S Tadross; A M Nanu; M J Buchanan; R G Checketts
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  [Total femur replacement following multiple periprosthetic fractures between ipsilateral hip and knee replacement in chronic rheumatoid arthritis. Case report of 2 patients].

Authors:  M Porsch; R Galm; L Hovy; M Starker; F Kerschbaumer
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date.

Authors:  D G Lewallen; D J Berry
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1998

Review 6.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

Review 7.  The treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur using cortical onlay allograft struts.

Authors:  O H Brady; D S Garbuz; B A Masri; C P Duncan
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Uncemented revision stem for biological osteosynthesis in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  C Eingartner; R Volkmann; M Pütz; S Weller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after hip arthroplasty. A statistical analysis of outcome based on 487 patients.

Authors:  M A Mont; D C Maar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures.

Authors:  R K Beals; S S Tower
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review.

Authors:  Claudia C Sidler-Maier; James P Waddell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective study with functional and radiological outcomes from 2010 to 2016.

Authors:  Gaetano Caruso; Lorenzo Milani; Tedi Marko; Vincenzo Lorusso; Mattia Andreotti; Leo Massari
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-11-25

3.  Primary cementless hip arthroplasty as a potential risk factor for non-union after long-stem revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Sandra Boesmueller; Marc Michel; Marcus Hofbauer; Patrick Platzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comparison of therapeutic outcomes of periprosthetic femoral fracture between treatments employing locking and conventional plates.

Authors:  Tomonori Baba; Kazuo Kaneko; Katsuo Shitoto; Kentaro Futamura; Yuichiro Maruyama
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-05-17

5.  Tangential Bicortical Locked Fixation Improves Stability in Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Cyrus T Caroom; Hwabok Wee; Darin Jurgensmeier; Shane D Rothermel; Michelle A Bramer; John Spence Reid
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 6.  Periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem: overcoming challenges and avoiding pitfalls.

Authors:  Andrew N Fleischman; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-09

7.  Midterm Results of Consecutive Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Vancouver Type A and B.

Authors:  Klemens Trieb; Rainer Fiala; Christian Briglauer
Journal:  Clin Pract       Date:  2016-08-24

8.  Energy Required for Fracture in Synthetic Proximal Femoral Models After Synthesis Material Removal: a Biomechanical Study Using Cannulated Screws, Dynamic Hip Screws, and Proximal Femoral Nails.

Authors:  Anderson Freitas; Landwehrle de Lucena da Silva; Renilton Rodrigues Costa; Lucas Sacramento Ramos; Marcos Norberto Giordano; Henrique Mansur Gonçalves
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-03-31

9.  Mid- and long-term efficacy of surgical treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Jian-Ning Sun; Yu Zhang; Ye Zhang; Jia-Ming Zhang; Xiang-Yang Chen; Shuo Feng
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.