Literature DB >> 1873564

Breast cancer screening. A brief historical review.

J N Wolfe1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer screening by a combination of clinical breast examination (CBE) and mammography is effective in reducing mortality from breast cancer in all age groups for years 40 and above. Mammography is the single most effective method in obtaining the mortality reductions. The CBE should not be omitted, however, in that it does add information not apparent on mammography. The CBE can be done safely by a nonphysician properly trained. Breast self-examination (BSE) is ineffectual in reducing mortality. It is debatable if it has a role in screening for breast cancer at all. This observer believes it should be done, in that its cost is minimal once the training is over.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1873564     DOI: 10.1007/bf02633536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  12 in total

1.  First results on mortality reduction in the UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer. UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-08-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  A F Saftlas; J N Wolfe; R N Hoover; L A Brinton; C Schairer; M Salane; M Szklo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Clinical examination of the breasts by nonphysicians: a viable screening option?

Authors:  M Moskowitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study.

Authors:  J N Wolfe; A F Saftlas; M Salane
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Survival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.

Authors:  H Seidman; S K Gelb; E Silverberg; N LaVerda; J A Lubera
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Diet, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  J Brisson; R Verreault; A S Morrison; S Tennina; F Meyer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Physical examination. Its role as a single screening modality in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  C J Baines; A B Miller; A A Bassett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Mammographic parenchymal features and breast cancer in the breast cancer detection demonstration project.

Authors:  J Brisson; A S Morrison; N Khalid
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1988-12-07       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Breast self-examination and medical examination related to breast cancer stage.

Authors:  R T Senie; P P Rosen; M L Lesser; D W Kinne
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  1 in total

1.  A comparison of breast cancers detected by mass screening and those found in out-patient clinics.

Authors:  M Noguchi; M Earashi; N Ohta; H Kitagawa; M Thomas; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.