Literature DB >> 2545096

Diet, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk.

J Brisson1, R Verreault, A S Morrison, S Tennina, F Meyer.   

Abstract

This case-control study was designed to reevaluate the association of the morphology of breast tissue seen on mammograms with breast cancer risk and to assess the relation of diet, especially intake of fat and vitamin A, to the high-risk mammographic images. The cases included 290 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who were first treated in Quebec in 1982-1984. The controls included 645 women who participated in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Risk of breast cancer was higher among women with the P2 or DY parenchymal pattern (relative risk (RR) = 3.7, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 2.0-7.0) than it was among those with the N1 pattern. Moreover, risk increased regularly with the extent of nodular and homogeneous densities on the mammogram. Relative risk was 5.5 (95% Cl 2.3-13.2) for women in whom 60% or more of the volume of the breast showed either nodular or homogeneous densities compared with women without such densities. Among controls, increase in energy-adjusted saturated fat intake was associated with an increase in extent of high-risk mammographic features. Energy-adjusted polyunsaturated fat or cholesterol intake did not, however, appear to influence the morphology of breast tissue seen on the mammogram. Increasing carotenoid and fiber intakes were associated with a reduction of the extent of densities on the mammogram, but retinol intake seemed to have little or no effect on mammographic features. These data suggest that elevation in saturated fat intake and reduction in carotenoid and fiber intakes may be related to an increase in breast cancer risk through effects of these nutrients on breast tissue morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2545096     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  38 in total

1.  An investigation of the effects of mammographic acquisition parameters on a semiautomated quantitative measure of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  N J Hangiandreou; C J Mount; K R Brandt; J P Quam; A Manduca; C M Vachon; T A Sellers
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention.

Authors:  N F Boyd; L J Martin; J Stone; C Greenberg; S Minkin; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Adolescent diet and subsequent serum hormones, breast density, and bone mineral density in young women: results of the Dietary Intervention Study in Children follow-up study.

Authors:  Joanne F Dorgan; Lea Liu; Catherine Klifa; Nola Hylton; John A Shepherd; Frank Z Stanczyk; Linda G Snetselaar; Linda Van Horn; Victor J Stevens; Alan Robson; Peter O Kwiterovich; Norman L Lasser; John H Himes; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Andrea Kriska; Elizabeth H Ruder; Carolyn Y Fang; Bruce A Barton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Association between mammographic density and age-related lobular involution of the breast.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Lynn C Hartmann; Carol Reynolds; Daniel W Visscher; Kathleen R Brandt; Robert A Vierkant; Christopher G Scott; Derek C Radisky; Thomas A Sellers; V Shane Pankratz; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Pilot study demonstrating potential association between breast cancer image-based risk phenotypes and genomic biomarkers.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Chang Sun; Umnouy Ponsukcharoen; Dezheng Huo; Li Lan; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Andrew R Jamieson; Jeremy Bancroft Brown; Anna Di Rienzo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Laterality of breast cancer in the United States.

Authors:  H A Weiss; S S Devesa; L A Brinton
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Dietary Fat Intake During Adolescence and Breast Density Among Young Women.

Authors:  Seungyoun Jung; Olga Goloubeva; Catherine Klifa; Erin S LeBlanc; Linda G Snetselaar; Linda Van Horn; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Alcohol intake over the life course and mammographic density.

Authors:  Julie D Flom; Jennifer S Ferris; Parisa Tehranifar; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Independent association of lobular involution and mammographic breast density with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Celine M Vachon; V Shane Pankratz; Robert A Vierkant; Stephanie S Anderson; Kathleen R Brandt; Daniel W Visscher; Carol Reynolds; Marlene H Frost; Lynn C Hartmann
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Relationship Between Breast Density and Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators, Aromatase Inhibitors, Physical Activity, and Diet: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ernest U Ekpo; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.