Literature DB >> 18728316

The optimum conditions to collect X-ray data from very small samples.

John A Cowan1, Colin Nave.   

Abstract

A previous paper [Nave & Hill (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 299-303] examined the possibility of reduced radiation damage for small crystals (10 microm and below in size) under conditions where the photoelectrons could escape from the sample. The conclusion of this paper was that higher-energy radiation (e.g. 40 keV) could offer an advantage as the photoelectron path length was greater and less energy would be deposited in the crystal. This paper refines these calculations further by including the effects of energy deposited owing to Compton scattering and the energy difference between the incident photon and the emitted photoelectron. An estimate is given for the optimum wavelength for collecting data from a protein crystal of a given size and composition. Another way of reducing radiation damage from a protein crystal is to collect data with a very short pulsed X-ray source where a single image can be obtained before subsequent radiation damage occurs. A comparison of this approach compared with the use of shorter wavelengths is made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18728316     DOI: 10.1107/S0909049508014623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat        ISSN: 0909-0495            Impact factor:   2.616


  22 in total

1.  Glass transition in thaumatin crystals revealed through temperature-dependent radiation-sensitivity measurements.

Authors:  Matthew Warkentin; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-09-18

2.  Energy dependence of site-specific radiation damage in protein crystals.

Authors:  Christina Homer; Laura Cooper; Ana Gonzalez
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.616

3.  Radiation damage in protein crystals is reduced with a micron-sized X-ray beam.

Authors:  Ruslan Sanishvili; Derek W Yoder; Sudhir Babu Pothineni; Gerd Rosenbaum; Shenglan Xu; Stefan Vogt; Sergey Stepanov; Oleg A Makarov; Stephen Corcoran; Richard Benn; Venugopalan Nagarajan; Janet L Smith; Robert F Fischetti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Micro-crystallography comes of age.

Authors:  Janet L Smith; Robert F Fischetti; Masaki Yamamoto
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  Estimate your dose: RADDOSE-3D.

Authors:  Charles S Bury; Jonathan C Brooks-Bartlett; Steven P Walsh; Elspeth F Garman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Know your dose: RADDOSE.

Authors:  Karthik S Paithankar; Elspeth F Garman
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

7.  Radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography: what is it and why should we care?

Authors:  Elspeth F Garman
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

8.  The minimum crystal size needed for a complete diffraction data set.

Authors:  James M Holton; Kenneth A Frankel
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

Review 9.  High-throughput crystallography for structural genomics.

Authors:  Andrzej Joachimiak
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Synchrotron radiation: micrometer-sized x-ray beams as fine tools for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Thomas R Schneider
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2008-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.