Literature DB >> 18727096

Positive contrast visualization of nitinol devices using susceptibility gradient mapping.

Evert-jan P A Vonken1, Michael Schär, Matthias Stuber.   

Abstract

MRI visualization of devices is traditionally based on signal loss due to T(2)* effects originating from local susceptibility differences. To visualize nitinol devices with positive contrast, a recently introduced postprocessing method is adapted to map the induced susceptibility gradients. This method operates on regular gradient-echo MR images and maps the shift in k-space in a (small) neighborhood of every voxel by Fourier analysis followed by a center-of-mass calculation. The quantitative map of the local shifts generates the positive contrast image of the devices, while areas without susceptibility gradients render a background with noise only. The positive signal response of this method depends only on the choice of the voxel neighborhood size. The properties of the method are explained and the visualizations of a nitinol wire and two stents are shown for illustration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18727096      PMCID: PMC2627583          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  10 in total

1.  Linear combination steady-state free precession MRI.

Authors:  S S Vasanawala; J M Pauly; D G Nishimura
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  MR imaging in the presence of vascular stents: A systematic assessment of artifacts for various stent orientations, sequence types, and field strengths.

Authors:  T Klemm; S Duda; J Machann; K Seekamp-Rahn; L Schnieder; C D Claussen; F Schick
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Passive tracking exploiting local signal conservation: the white marker phenomenon.

Authors:  Jan-Henry Seppenwoolde; Max A Viergever; Chris J G Bakker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Michael Schär; Sebastian Kozerke; Stefan E Fischer; Peter Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Charles H Cunningham; Takayasu Arai; Phillip C Yang; Michael V McConnell; John M Pauly; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Cellular MR imaging.

Authors:  Michel Modo; Mathias Hoehn; Jeff W M Bulte
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  Dephased MRI.

Authors:  Chris J G Bakker; Jan-Henry Seppenwoolde; Koen L Vincken
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Generating positive contrast from off-resonant spins with steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging: theory and proof-of-principle experiments.

Authors:  Rohan Dharmakumar; Ioannis Koktzoglou; Debiao Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Positive contrast visualization of iron oxide-labeled stem cells using inversion-recovery with ON-resonant water suppression (IRON).

Authors:  Matthias Stuber; Wesley D Gilson; Michael Schär; Dorota A Kedziorek; Lawrence V Hofmann; Saurabh Shah; Evert-Jan Vonken; Jeff W M Bulte; Dara L Kraitchman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient-echo imaging.

Authors:  J R Reichenbach; R Venkatesan; D A Yablonskiy; M R Thompson; S Lai; E M Haacke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Echo-dephased steady state free precession.

Authors:  Sunil Patil; Oliver Bieri; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Utilizing different methods for visualizing susceptibility from a single multi-gradient echo dataset.

Authors:  Gopal Varma; Steen Fjord Pedersen; Matthias Taupitz; Rene Michael Botnar; Hannes Dahnke; Stephen Frederick Keevil; Tobias Schaeffter
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Susceptibility gradient quantization by MRI signal response mapping (SIRMA) to dephaser.

Authors:  F Franconi; C Chapon; J J Le Jeune; P Richomme; L Lemaire
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Positive contrast visualization of SPIO-labeled pancreatic islets using echo-dephased steady-state free precession.

Authors:  S Patil; D Jirák; F Saudek; M Hájek; K Scheffler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Direct in vitro comparison of six three-dimensional positive contrast methods for susceptibility marker imaging.

Authors:  Evert-jan P A Vonken; Michael Schär; Jing Yu; Chris J G Bakker; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Positive visualization of MR-compatible nitinol stent using a susceptibility-based imaging technique.

Authors:  Caiyun Shi; Guoxi Xie; Dong Liang; Haifeng Wang; Yi Huang; Yanan Ren; Yong Xue; Hanwei Chen; Shi Su; Xin Liu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-03

7.  Positive Contrast MRI Techniques for Visualization of Iron-Loaded Hernia Mesh Implants in Patients.

Authors:  Alexander Ciritsis; Daniel Truhn; Nienke L Hansen; Jens Otto; Christiane K Kuhl; Nils A Kraemer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.