Literature DB >> 9090577

Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient-echo imaging.

J R Reichenbach1, R Venkatesan, D A Yablonskiy, M R Thompson, S Lai, E M Haacke.   

Abstract

The influence of local static magnetic field inhomogeneities on gradient-echo imaging is discussed and the underlying theoretical aspects are reviewed. A high-resolution approach is suggested to suppress image distortion and restore signal loss due to spin dephasing. Acquisition of three-dimensional data sets not only overcomes part of the limitations associated with gradient echoes but also makes it possible to extract local information about the strength or direction of background gradients and relative susceptibility changes between different tissues. Applications of the suggested approach in the human brain for anatomical imaging as well as for extraction of physical and physiological parameters are presented and discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9090577     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  51 in total

1.  R*(2) mapping in the presence of macroscopic B₀ field variations.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Karl K Vigen; Ann Shimakawa; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with pyogenic brain abscesses at 1.5T: characteristics of the abscess capsule.

Authors:  P H Lai; H C Chang; T C Chuang; H W Chung; J Y Li; M J Weng; J H Fu; P C Wang; S C Li; H B Pan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Echo-dephased steady state free precession.

Authors:  Sunil Patil; Oliver Bieri; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Utilizing different methods for visualizing susceptibility from a single multi-gradient echo dataset.

Authors:  Gopal Varma; Steen Fjord Pedersen; Matthias Taupitz; Rene Michael Botnar; Hannes Dahnke; Stephen Frederick Keevil; Tobias Schaeffter
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  Clinical applications of susceptibility weighted MR imaging of the brain - a pictorial review.

Authors:  Bejoy Thomas; Sivaraman Somasundaram; Krishnamoorthy Thamburaj; Chandrasekharan Kesavadas; Arun Kumar Gupta; Narendra K Bodhey; Tirur Raman Kapilamoorthy
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Susceptibility gradient quantization by MRI signal response mapping (SIRMA) to dephaser.

Authors:  F Franconi; C Chapon; J J Le Jeune; P Richomme; L Lemaire
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Spin dephasing under nonlinear gradients: implications for imaging and field mapping.

Authors:  Gigi Galiana; Jason P Stockmann; Leo Tam; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  [Visualization of symmetric striopallidodentate calcinosis by using high-resolution susceptibility-weighted MR imaging. An account of the impact of different diagnostic methods of M. Fahr].

Authors:  J Böttcher; D Sauner; A Jentsch; H-J Mentzel; H Becker; J R Reichenbach; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 9.  Detection and quantification of magnetically labeled cells by cellular MRI.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 10.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Saifeng Liu; Sagar Buch; Yongsheng Chen; Hyun-Seok Choi; Yongming Dai; Charbel Habib; Jiani Hu; Joon-Yong Jung; Yu Luo; David Utriainen; Meiyun Wang; Dongmei Wu; Shuang Xia; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.