Literature DB >> 19644720

Utilizing different methods for visualizing susceptibility from a single multi-gradient echo dataset.

Gopal Varma1, Steen Fjord Pedersen, Matthias Taupitz, Rene Michael Botnar, Hannes Dahnke, Stephen Frederick Keevil, Tobias Schaeffter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Objects that cause a susceptibility gradient can generate regions of hypo-intensity in MRI. MR techniques developed for positive enhancement of such objects require sequence parameter optimization. Thus comparison of images acquired successively using different techniques is difficult since different parameter settings result in variations in signal and noise. A new method is presented that allows production of positive contrast images, a relaxation rate R*2-map and negative contrast images from a single dataset by post-processing.
METHODS: Positive contrast techniques considered include the "white marker" technique, inversion-recovery on-resonance (IRON) and susceptibility gradient mapping (SGM). The new method was tested in phantoms of iron-oxide agent gel solutions and prostate marker seeds. Images produced by post-processing were compared with those obtained directly. The post-processing technique was applied in vivo for the visualization of iron-oxide contrast agent uptake in a balloon-injured swine carotid model.
RESULTS: The images produced in the post-processing step allowed determination of optimal parameter settings for each technique. SGM was found to provide the greatest positive contrast, whilst the T*2-weighted images provide more sensitivity to regions that exhibited weaker susceptibility effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined T*2-weighted imaging and SGM using the same complex image data was found to provide complementary information and high sensitivity to detect distortion inducing agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19644720     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-009-0180-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  19 in total

1.  Phasing spin-echo-acquired 31P spectroscopic images using complex conjugate data reversal.

Authors:  D Bourgeois; R Deslauriers
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Charles H Cunningham; Takayasu Arai; Phillip C Yang; Michael V McConnell; John M Pauly; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Positive contrast visualization of iron oxide-labeled stem cells using inversion-recovery with ON-resonant water suppression (IRON).

Authors:  Matthias Stuber; Wesley D Gilson; Michael Schär; Dorota A Kedziorek; Lawrence V Hofmann; Saurabh Shah; Evert-Jan Vonken; Jeff W M Bulte; Dara L Kraitchman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds.

Authors:  J F Schenck
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Adventitial angiogenesis early after coronary angioplasty : correlation with arterial remodeling.

Authors:  K Pels; M Labinaz; C Hoffert; E R O'Brien
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 6.  Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient-echo imaging.

Authors:  J R Reichenbach; R Venkatesan; D A Yablonskiy; M R Thompson; S Lai; E M Haacke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data.

Authors:  H Gudbjartsson; S Patz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging.

Authors:  K M Lüdeke; P Röschmann; R Tischler
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Mouse model mimics multiple sclerosis in the clinico-radiological paradox.

Authors:  Jens Wuerfel; Eva Tysiak; Timour Prozorovski; Maureen Smyth; Susanne Mueller; Joerg Schnorr; Matthias Taupitz; Frauke Zipp
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Susceptibility gradient mapping (SGM): a new postprocessing method for positive contrast generation applied to superparamagnetic iron oxide particle (SPIO)-labeled cells.

Authors:  Hannes Dahnke; Wei Liu; Daniel Herzka; Joseph A Frank; Tobias Schaeffter
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  3 in total

1.  Combined off-resonance imaging and T2 relaxation in the rotating frame for positive contrast MR imaging of infection in a murine burn model.

Authors:  Ovidiu C Andronesi; Dionyssios Mintzopoulos; Valeria Righi; Nikolaos Psychogios; Meenu Kesarwani; Jianxin He; Shingo Yasuhara; George Dai; Laurence G Rahme; Aria A Tzika
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Susceptibility gradient quantization by MRI signal response mapping (SIRMA) to dephaser.

Authors:  F Franconi; C Chapon; J J Le Jeune; P Richomme; L Lemaire
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Direct in vitro comparison of six three-dimensional positive contrast methods for susceptibility marker imaging.

Authors:  Evert-jan P A Vonken; Michael Schär; Jing Yu; Chris J G Bakker; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.