Literature DB >> 18726656

Effect of gender and preoperative diagnosis on results of revision total knee arthroplasty.

Stephanie Y Pun1, Michael D Ries.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Recent studies question an effect of gender on outcome of primary TKA. We questioned whether the results of revision TKA were affected by gender. We separated 67 revision TKAs by gender and preoperative diagnosis into four groups (arthrofibrosis, infection, instability, and wear and loosening). Each revision TKA was individually matched by age and gender to two primary TKAs. Postoperative Knee Society pain and function scores after revision TKA were lower than for primary TKA for both females and males. However, postoperative Knee Society pain and function scores were similar in males and females. Postoperative pain and function scores were lower for all revision groups compared with primary TKA, except for pain and function scores after revision for instability. Postoperative pain and function scores were higher for instability and wear or loosening than for arthrofibrosis. Our data suggest the results of revision TKA are affected by preoperative diagnosis but not gender. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective matched cohort study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18726656      PMCID: PMC2565035          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0451-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

1.  Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M D Ries; M Badalamente
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision.

Authors:  Jane Kim; Charles L Nelson; Paul A Lotke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement.

Authors:  S B Haas; J N Insall; W Montgomery; R E Windsor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Endosteal referencing in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M D Ries
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Exploration of radiographically normal total knee replacements for unexplained pain.

Authors:  M A Mont; F K Serna; K A Krackow; D S Hungerford
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A comparison of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the kinematic stabilizer prosthesis.

Authors:  A D Hanssen; J A Rand
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems.

Authors:  Kirby Hitt; John R Shurman; Kenneth Greene; Joseph McCarthy; Joseph Moskal; Tim Hoeman; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Olivier Ethgen; Olivier Bruyère; Florent Richy; Charles Dardennes; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer.

Authors:  R M Dominic Meek; Bassam A Masri; David Dunlop; Donald S Garbuz; Nelson V Greidanus; Robert McGraw; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  13 in total

1.  Predictive factors for failure after total knee replacement revision.

Authors:  Rafael Luque; Belen Rizo; Antonio Urda; Rodrigo Garcia-Crespo; Enrique Moro; Fernando Marco; Luis López-Duran
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Microorganisms responsible for periprosthetic knee infections in England and Wales.

Authors:  Richard J Holleyman; Paul Baker; Andre Charlett; Kate Gould; David J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  When do patient-reported assessments peak after revision knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ajay Malviya; Karen Bettinson; Steven M Kurtz; David J Deehan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup.

Authors:  Robin W T M van Kempen; Janneke J P Schimmel; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Hilde Vandenneucker; Ate B Wymenga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Predisposing factors which are relevant for the clinical outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francois Hardeman; Jürgen Londers; Alexander Favril; Erik Witvrouw; Johan Bellemans; Jan Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Predictors of moderate-severe functional limitation 2 and 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Megan M O'Byrne; W Scott Harmsen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Underlying diagnosis predicts patient-reported outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Men and Women Demonstrate Differences in Early Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Allison M Gustavson; Pamela Wolfe; Jason R Falvey; Donald G Eckhoff; Michael J Toth; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Time trends in the characteristics of patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  Increasing obesity and comorbidity in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty in the U.S.: a 13-year study of time trends.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.