Literature DB >> 24402557

Predictive factors for failure after total knee replacement revision.

Rafael Luque1, Belen Rizo, Antonio Urda, Rodrigo Garcia-Crespo, Enrique Moro, Fernando Marco, Luis López-Duran.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We used the Optetrak Condylar Constrained (CCK) implant, a modular and constrained knee implant as replacement for a failed primary arthroplasty, to assess the survivorship, the complications, the clinical, radiological, and functional situation, and the quality of life of those patients in whom a CCK had been implanted in recent years in order to find predictive pre-operative conditions of survival and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 125 CCK implanted between 1999 and 2005. The mean follow-up was nine years (range, seven to 13). Mean age was 73.6 years. A total of 78% of the revised TKA were cemented and 66% were CR. We assessed the pre-operative, the operative and the postoperative conditions studying the medical files of all the patients. In order to study the functional and clinical situation we used the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and the Knee Society score (KSS), both clinical and functional. We analysed all the X-rays using the Knee Society Roentgenographic evaluation. The quality of life was studied using the Oxford knee score (OKS).
RESULTS: The mean results of the KSS clinical and the KSS functional were 68.24 and 63.85, respectively. There were not any conditions associated with poor results of the knees (p > 0.05). The global survival at 24 months was 92.7%, at 60 months 87.8% and at 96 months it was 87.8%. There were some conditions associated with poor survival of the knees, e.g. patients were younger than 70 years old, rheumatic diseases, kidney faliure, tibial tuberosity osteotomy, PS primary arthroplasty, revision before five years and septic loosening.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results there are some pre-operative factors that change the survival of the total knee replacement revision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24402557      PMCID: PMC3923955          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2268-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  41 in total

Review 1.  Complications after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Khaled J Saleh; Daniel P Hoeffel; Rida A Kassim; Gideon Burstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Reoperations after 3200 revision TKAs: rates, etiology, and lessons learned.

Authors:  Rafael J Sierra; William P Cooney; Mark W Pagnano; Robert T Trousdale; James A Rand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Khaled J Saleh; Daryll C Dykes; Richard L Tweedie; Khadeeja Mohamed; Ashwin Ravichandran; Raied M Saleh; Terence J Gioe; David A Heck
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Revision total knee arthroplasty using a constrained condylar knee prosthesis in conjunction with a posterior stabilized articular polyethylene.

Authors:  Jin Kyu Lee; Sung-Jae Kim; Choong H Choi; Hyun-Kee Chung
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack; G Engh; C Rorabeck; J Sawhney; M Woolfrey
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Preoperative risks and outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Frances Weaver; Denise Hynes; William Hopkinson; Richard Wixson; Shukri Khuri; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses.

Authors:  James A Rand; Robert T Trousdale; Duane M Ilstrup; W Scott Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Patient outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Puyi Sheng; Matti Lehto; Matti Kataja; Pekka Halonen; Teemu Moilanen; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in aseptic and septic revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ching-Jen Wang; Ming-Chun Hsieh; Ting-Wen Huang; Jun-Wen Wang; Han-Shiang Chen; Chen-Yeo Liu
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  11 in total

1.  Periprosthetic humeral fractures associated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: incidence and management.

Authors:  Carlos García-Fernández; Yaiza Lópiz-Morales; Alberto Rodríguez; Luis López-Durán; Fernando Marco Martínez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Infrared assessment of knee instability in ACL deficient patients.

Authors:  Aleksandar Matić; Suzana Petrović Savić; Branko Ristić; Vladan B Stevanović; Goran Devedžić
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Primary modular total knee replacement in severe and unstable osteoarthritis. Predictive factors for failure.

Authors:  Rafael Luque; Belen Rizo; Antonio Urda; Rodrigo Garcia-Crespo; Enrique Moro; Luis López-Durán
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changyao Wang; Tilman Pfitzner; Philipp von Roth; Hermann O Mayr; Michael Sostheim; Robert Hube
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The impact of posterior-stabilized vs. constrained polyethylene liners in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ittai Shichman; Christian T Oakley; Geidily Beaton; Utkarsh Anil; Nimrod Snir; Joshua Rozell; Morteza Meftah; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Flaps for closure of soft tissue defects in infected revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arnold J Suda; Angela Cieslik; Paul A Grützner; Matthias Münzberg; Volkmar Heppert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Antibiotic cement was associated with half the risk of re-revision in 1,154 aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Stefano A Bini; Priscilla H Chan; Maria C S Inacio; Elizabeth W Paxton; Monti Khatod
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Observational Study of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Aseptic Revision Surgery: Clinical Results.

Authors:  Gabriel Oliver; Luis Jaldin; Eric Camprubí; Guillermo Cortés
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.071

9.  Validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford knee score and assessment of its utility to characterize quality of life of patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis: a multicentric study.

Authors:  Jesús Martín-Fernández; Roberto García-Maroto; Fco Javier Sánchez-Jiménez; Alonso Bau-González; Homero Valencia-García; Blanca Gutiérrez-Teira; Juan Carlos Arenaza; Lidia García-Pérez; Renata Linertová; Amaia Bilbao
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Failure Analysis in Multiple TKA Revisions-Periprosthetic Infections Remain Surgeons' Nemesis.

Authors:  Stephanie Kirschbaum; Sarah Erhart; Carsten Perka; Robert Hube; Kathi Thiele
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.