Literature DB >> 8895641

Exploration of radiographically normal total knee replacements for unexplained pain.

M A Mont1, F K Serna, K A Krackow, D S Hungerford.   

Abstract

Twenty-seven patients underwent exploration of their total knee replacements because of severe debilitating pain of an unknown cause. The group was further subdivided into (1) patients who had painful knees with range of motion greater than 80 degrees and (2) patients who had painful knees with decreased range of motion (< 80 degrees arc). At final followup, there were 11 excellent and good results (41%) with 16 fair or poor results (59%). For the 15 patients with decreased range of motion, 9 of 15 knees (60%) had good or excellent results. Range of motion arc improved from a preoperative 43 degrees average to a 81 degrees average. For the pain only group, there were only 2 excellent or good results (17%). Poor results were encountered in 6 of 7 patients (86%) in whom a cementless prosthesis was converted to a cemented prosthesis. If a problem was identified at surgery, only 3 of 12 knees (25%) had successful outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8895641     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199610000-00030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  25 in total

Review 1.  Pain after knee arthroplasty: an unresolved issue.

Authors:  Irina Grosu; Patricia Lavand'homme; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The painful knee after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Becker; M Bonnin; S Hofmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Painful knee prosthesis: surgical approach.

Authors:  Marco Villano; Christian Carulli; Serena Puccini; Stefano Soderi; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-05

Review 4.  [Patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty: clinical pathway and review of the literature].

Authors:  H-R Springorum; B Rath; C Baier; P Lechler; C Lüring; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants.

Authors:  Jan Fritz; Brett Lurie; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  [Painful total knee arthroplasty. A treatment algorithm].

Authors:  M Wörner; H R Springorum; B Craiovan; S Winkler; J Grifka; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  The presence and influence of mild depressive symptoms on post-operative pain perception following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alessandro Bistolfi; Elisa Bettoni; Alessandro Aprato; Patrizia Milani; Paola Berchialla; Eugenio Graziano; Giuseppe Massazza; Gwo Chin Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) technique for reducing metal artifacts after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ahmed Jawhar; Miriam Reichert; Michael Kostrzewa; Mathias Nittka; Ulrike Attenberger; Henning Roehl; Frederic Bludau
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-10-11

9.  Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup.

Authors:  Robin W T M van Kempen; Janneke J P Schimmel; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Hilde Vandenneucker; Ate B Wymenga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species induce protein and DNA modifications driving arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Theresa A Freeman; Javad Parvizi; Craig J Della Valle; Marla J Steinbeck
Journal:  Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair       Date:  2009-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.