Literature DB >> 18726646

CT colonography: same-day tagging regimen with iodixanol and reduced cathartic preparation.

Emanuele Neri1, Francesca Turini, Francesca Cerri, Paola Vagli, Carlo Bartolozzi.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to test the tagging performance and patient's acceptance of a reduced cathartic preparation, based on iodixanol and PEG, administered to patients 3 h before the exam. One hundred and thirty-two asymptomatic patients were enrolled. As colonic cleansing we used PEG macrogol 3350. For fluid tagging iodixanol was orally administered 3 h before the exam, in a total dose of 50 mL mixed with 34.8 g of PEG in 750 mL of water. Image's review showed 446 segments (56.4%) clean of feces and 346 segments (43.6%) with feces. Untagged fluid was observed in 74/706 (10.5%) segments; inhomogeneous tagging in 129/706 (16%); the average density of fluid was 1054.74 UH in the cecum-ascending colon and 905.14 UH in the descending-sigmoid colon; the average difference of density between right and left colonic segments was 149 UH, and it was statistically significant (P = 0.016). No side effects related to the consumption of Movicol were reported. Very few side effects related to the tagging solution were reported: mild nausea in 7 (0.05%) patients, mild diarrhea in 10 (0.07%). An average rank of 9 points (SD +/- 1) on a 10-point scale (10 = no discomfort, 0 = severe discomfort) resulted from the self-administered questionnaire, showing an excellent acceptance of the preparation. Same day fluid tagging with iodixanol provides an optimal fluid tagging, it is completely tolerated by the patient, and it can be performed under medical control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18726646     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-008-9453-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  9 in total

1.  Bowel cleansing before CT colonography: comparison between two minimal-preparation regimens.

Authors:  F Iafrate; M Iannitti; M Ciolina; P Baldassari; A Pichi; A Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: A review of current recommendations on methodology and clinical indications.

Authors:  Paola Scalise; Annalisa Mantarro; Francesca Pancrazi; Emanuele Neri
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

3.  CT colonography without cathartic preparation: positive predictive value and patient experience in clinical practice.

Authors:  Carmen Zueco Zueco; Carolina Sobrido Sampedro; Juan D Corroto; Paula Rodriguez Fernández; Manuela Fontanillo Fontanillo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Informatics in radiology: Electronic cleansing for noncathartic CT colonography: a structure-analysis scheme.

Authors:  Wenli Cai; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Michael E Zalis; Janne Johannes Näppi; Gordon J Harris
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  A simplified approach to virtual colonoscopy using different intestinal preparations: preliminary experience with regard to quality, accuracy and patient acceptability.

Authors:  N Faccioli; G Foti; M Barillari; A Zaccarella; L Camera; C Biasiutti; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Pilot study on efficacy of reduced cathartic bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl.

Authors:  Zhi-Yuan Chen; He-Song Shen; Ming-Yue Luo; Chai-Jie Duan; Wen-Li Cai; Hong-Bing Lu; Guo-Peng Zhang; Yang Liu; Jerome Z Liang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Comparison of three different iodine-based bowel regimens for CT colonography.

Authors:  Delia Campanella; Lia Morra; Silvia Delsanto; Vincenzo Tartaglia; Roberto Asnaghi; Alberto Bert; Emanuele Neri; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Effect of dose splitting of a low-volume bowel preparation macrogol-based solution on CT colonography tagging quality.

Authors:  Francesco Mistretta; Nicolò Damiani; Delia Campanella; Simone Mazzetti; Alessia Gulino; Giovanni Cappello; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.313

9.  The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.

Authors:  Emanuele Neri; Steve Halligan; Mikael Hellström; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Daniele Regge; Jaap Stoker; Stuart Taylor; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.