Literature DB >> 27247713

Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: A review of current recommendations on methodology and clinical indications.

Paola Scalise1, Annalisa Mantarro1, Francesca Pancrazi1, Emanuele Neri1.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents one of the most relevant causes of morbidity and mortality in Western societies. CRC screening is actually based on faecal occult blood testing, and optical colonoscopy still remains the gold standard screening test for cancer detection. However, computed tomography colonography (CT colonography) constitutes a reliable, minimally-invasive method to rapidly and effectively evaluate the entire colon for clinically relevant lesions. Furthermore, even if the benefits of its employment in CRC mass screening have not fully established yet, CT colonography may represent a reasonable alternative screening test in patients who cannot undergo or refuse colonoscopy. Therefore, the purpose of our review is to illustrate the most updated recommendations on methodology and the current clinical indications of CT colonography, according to the data of the existing relevant literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Colorectal polyps; Computed tomography colonography; Screening; Virtual colonoscopy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27247713      PMCID: PMC4882404          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i5.472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  112 in total

1.  Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy.

Authors:  Matthew A Barish; Jorge A Soto; Joseph T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  CT colonography for colon cancer screening.

Authors:  Subhas Banerjee; Jacques Van Dam
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Time efficiency of CT colonography: 2D vs 3D visualization.

Authors:  Emanuele Neri; Francesca Vannozzi; Paola Vagli; Alex Bardine; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Prospective blinded trial comparing 45-mL and 90-mL doses of oral sodium phosphate for bowel preparation before computed tomographic colonography.

Authors:  David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt; J Louis Hinshaw; Andrew J Taylor; Rajat Mukherjee; Patrick R Pfau
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 5.  CT colonography: techniques, indications, findings.

Authors:  Thomas Mang; Anno Graser; Wolfgang Schima; Andrea Maier
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Small and diminutive polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a decision analysis for referral to colonoscopy.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Andrea Laghi; Angelo Zullo; David H Kim; Franco Iafrate; Sergio Morini
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Screening CT colonography: how I do it.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2002-01

9.  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.

Authors:  Michael Macari; Edmund J Bini; Xiaonan Xue; Andrew Milano; Seth S Katz; Daniel Resnick; Hersh Chandarana; Glen Krinsky; Klaus Klingenbeck; Christopher H Marshall; Alec J Megibow
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial.

Authors:  Daniele Regge; Patrizia Della Monica; Giovanni Galatola; Cristiana Laudi; Antonella Zambon; Loredana Correale; Roberto Asnaghi; Brunella Barbaro; Claudia Borghi; Delia Campanella; Maria Carla Cassinis; Riccardo Ferrari; Andrea Ferraris; Cesare Hassan; Rita Golfieri; Franco Iafrate; Gabriella Iussich; Andrea Laghi; Roberto Massara; Emanuele Neri; Lapo Sali; Silvia Venturini; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Bauer; Jürgen F Riemann; Thomas Seufferlein; Max Reinshagen; Stephan Hollerbach; Ulrike Haug; Susanne Unverzagt; Stephanie Boese; Madeleine Ritter-Herschbach; Patrick Jahn; Thomas Frese; Michael Harris; Margarete Landenberger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Tin, Titanium, Tantalum, Vanadium and Niobium Oxide Based Sensors to Detect Colorectal Cancer Exhalations in Blood Samples.

Authors:  Michele Astolfi; Giorgio Rispoli; Gabriele Anania; Elena Artioli; Veronica Nevoso; Giulia Zonta; Cesare Malagù
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Low-volume reduced bowel preparation regimen for CT colonography: a randomized noninferiority trial.

Authors:  Davide Bellini; Nicola Panvini; Simone Vicini; Marco Rengo; Paola Lucchesi; Damiano Caruso; Iacopo Carbone; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.