Literature DB >> 22246146

CT colonography without cathartic preparation: positive predictive value and patient experience in clinical practice.

Carmen Zueco Zueco1, Carolina Sobrido Sampedro, Juan D Corroto, Paula Rodriguez Fernández, Manuela Fontanillo Fontanillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) for polyps ≥ 6 mm detected at CT colonography (CTC) performed without cathartic preparation, with low-dose iodine faecal tagging regimen and to evaluate patient experience.
METHODS: 1920 average-risk patients underwent CTC without cathartic preparation. Faecal tagging was performed by diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium at a total dose of 60 ml (22.2 g of iodine).The standard interpretation method was primary 3D with 2D problem solving. We calculated per-patient and per-polyp PPV in relation to size and morphology. All colonic segments were evaluated for image quality (faecal tagging, amount of liquid and solid residual faeces and luminal distension). Patients completed a questionnaire before and after CTC to assess preparation and examination experience.
RESULTS: Per-polyp PPV for detected lesions of ≥ 6 mm, 6-9 mm, ≥ 10 mm and ≥ 30 mm were 94.3%, 93.1%, 94.7% and 98%, respectively. Per-polyp PPV, according to lesion morphology, was 94.6%, 97.3% and 85.1% for sessile, pedunculated and flat polyps, respectively. Per-patient PPV was 92.8%. Preparation without frank cathartics was reported to cause minimal discomfort by 78.9% of patients.
CONCLUSION: CTC without cathartic preparation and low-dose iodine faecal tagging may yield high PPVs for lesions ≥ 6 mm and is well accepted by patients. KEY POINTS: • Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) without cathartic preparation is well accepted by patients • Cathartic-free faecal tagging CTC yields high positive predictive values • CTC without cathartic preparation could improve uptake of colorectal cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22246146     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2367-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  39 in total

Review 1.  CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal.

Authors:  Michael E Zalis; Matthew A Barish; J Richard Choi; Abraham H Dachman; Helen M Fenlon; Joseph T Ferrucci; Seth N Glick; Andrea Laghi; Michael Macari; Elizabeth G McFarland; Martina M Morrin; Perry J Pickhardt; Jorge Soto; Judy Yee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2002-01

3.  Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study.

Authors:  Abraham H Dachman; Damien O Dawson; Philippe Lefere; Hiro Yoshida; Nasreen U Khan; Nicole Cipriani; David T Rubin
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2006-09-13

4.  Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Andrew J Taylor; David H Kim; Mark Reichelderfer; Deepak V Gopal; Patrick R Pfau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue?

Authors:  M Thomeer; D Bielen; D Vanbeckevoort; S Dymarkowski; A Gevers; P Rutgeerts; M Hiele; E Van Cutsem; G Marchal
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Limited-preparation CT colonography in frail elderly patients: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Aoife N Keeling; Michael M Slattery; Sum Leong; Eoghan McCarthy; Maja Susanto; Michael J Lee; Martina M Morrin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences.

Authors:  Thomas M Gluecker; C Daniel Johnson; William S Harmsen; Kenneth P Offord; Ann M Harris; Lynn A Wilson; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Screening CT colonography in an asymptomatic average-risk Asian population: a 2-year experience in a single institution.

Authors:  Sangbu An; Kyoung Ho Lee; Young Hoon Kim; Seong Ho Park; Hyun Young Kim; Se Hyung Kim; Nayoung Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Jensch; Shandra Bipat; Jan Peringa; Ayso H de Vries; Anneke Heutinck; Evelien Dekker; Lubbertus C Baak; Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Feasibility study of computed tomography colonography using limited bowel preparation at normal and low-dose levels study.

Authors:  Jasper Florie; Rogier E van Gelder; Michiel P Schutter; Adrienne van Randen; Henk W Venema; Steven de Jager; Victor P M van der Hulst; Anna Prent; Shandra Bipat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Lubbertus C Baak; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  11 in total

1.  Bowel preparation in CT colonography: Is diet restriction necessary? A randomised trial (DIETSAN).

Authors:  Davide Bellini; Domenico De Santis; Damiano Caruso; Marco Rengo; Riccardo Ferrari; Tommaso Biondi; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A novel volume-reduced CT colonography regimen using hypertonic laxative (polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid): randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kenichi Utano; Daisuke Takayanagi; Koichi Nagata; Masato Aizawa; Shungo Endo; Tetsutaro Nemoto; Daiki Nemoto; Noriyuki Isohata; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Kazutomo Togashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Pilot study on efficacy of reduced cathartic bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl.

Authors:  Zhi-Yuan Chen; He-Song Shen; Ming-Yue Luo; Chai-Jie Duan; Wen-Li Cai; Hong-Bing Lu; Guo-Peng Zhang; Yang Liu; Jerome Z Liang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Computed tomography colonography: emerging evidence to further support clinical effectiveness.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.287

6.  Use of CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Andrew A Plumb; Steve Halligan; Claire Nickerson; Paul Bassett; Andrew F Goddard; Stuart A Taylor; Julietta Patnick; David Burling
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Using computed tomography colonography in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer - a prospective study in a university hospital in South America.

Authors:  Augusto Castelli von Atzingen; Dario Ariel Tiferes; Elizabeth Deak; Délcio Matos; Giuseppe D'Ippolito
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Advances in CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Judy Yee; Stefanie Weinstein; Tara Morgan; Patrick Alore; Rizwan Aslam
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.

Authors:  Emanuele Neri; Steve Halligan; Mikael Hellström; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Daniele Regge; Jaap Stoker; Stuart Taylor; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for the detection of colonic neoplasia after positive faecal occult blood testing: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew A Plumb; Steve Halligan; Douglas A Pendsé; Stuart A Taylor; Susan Mallett
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.