Literature DB >> 18726589

Distortions of perceived auditory and visual space following adaptation to motion.

Ross W Deas1, Neil W Roach, Paul V McGraw.   

Abstract

Adaptation to visual motion can induce marked distortions of the perceived spatial location of subsequently viewed stationary objects. These positional shifts are direction specific and exhibit tuning for the speed of the adapting stimulus. In this study, we sought to establish whether comparable motion-induced distortions of space can be induced in the auditory domain. Using individually measured head related transfer functions (HRTFs) we created auditory stimuli that moved either leftward or rightward in the horizontal plane. Participants adapted to unidirectional auditory motion presented at a range of speeds and then judged the spatial location of a brief stationary test stimulus. All participants displayed direction-dependent and speed-tuned shifts in perceived auditory position relative to a 'no adaptation' baseline measure. To permit direct comparison between effects in different sensory domains, measurements of visual motion-induced distortions of perceived position were also made using stimuli equated in positional sensitivity for each participant. Both the overall magnitude of the observed positional shifts, and the nature of their tuning with respect to adaptor speed were similar in each case. A third experiment was carried out where participants adapted to visual motion prior to making auditory position judgements. Similar to the previous experiments, shifts in the direction opposite to that of the adapting motion were observed. These results add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that the neural mechanisms that encode visual and auditory motion are more similar than previously thought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18726589     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1543-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  68 in total

1.  Flexible retinotopy: motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex.

Authors:  David Whitney; Herbert C Goltz; Christopher G Thomas; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Motion-sensitive neurones in V5/MT modulate perceived spatial position.

Authors:  Paul V McGraw; Vincent Walsh; Brendan T Barrett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  The temporal growth and decay of the auditory motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Michael F Neelon; Rick L Jenison
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Influences of attention on auditory aftereffects following purely visual adaptation.

Authors:  Ji Hong; Thomas V Papathomas
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2006

5.  Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion.

Authors:  R J Snowden
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  The influence of adaptation on perceived visual location.

Authors:  D Whitaker; P V Mcgraw; D M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Minimum audible movement angle: marking the end points of the path traveled by a moving sound source.

Authors:  D R Perrott; K Marlborough
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; A B Schwartz; R E Kettner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface.

Authors:  D H Kelly
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-10

Review 10.  The Wellcome Prize Lecture. A map of auditory space in the mammalian brain: neural computation and development.

Authors:  A J King
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Audiovisual time perception is spatially specific.

Authors:  James Heron; Neil W Roach; James V M Hanson; Paul V McGraw; David Whitaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; James Heron; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Perceptual learning shapes multisensory causal inference via two distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  David P McGovern; Eugenie Roudaia; Fiona N Newell; Neil W Roach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Congruent audio-visual stimulation during adaptation modulates the subsequently experienced visual motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Minsun Park; Randolph Blake; Yeseul Kim; Chai-Youn Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  The Perception of Auditory Motion.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Johahn Leung
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.