Literature DB >> 2708691

Minimum audible movement angle: marking the end points of the path traveled by a moving sound source.

D R Perrott1, K Marlborough.   

Abstract

Four experienced subjects were tested on their ability to discriminate the direction of motion or the order of events in a single-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice adaptive paradigm. Two conditions, employing a broadband "pink" noise (500-8000 Hz), were examined: (1) A continuous noise was available from the moving sound source during the entire period of travel; and (2) 10-ms noise pulses were presented from the moving source at the beginning and end of the arc traveled (during the interpulse interval the source was inactive). Minimum audible movement angle (MAMA) thresholds were significantly lower when the moving source was active throughout the period of travel (0.914 degrees) than when only the end points of the arc of travel were "marked" (1.604 degrees). These results do not support the notion that the discrimination of motion can be reduced to a simple comparison of the location of the source at signal onset and the position of the source at signal offset. The MAMA thresholds obtained with broadband noise in the current experiment are considerably lower than the thresholds previously observed with tonal targets.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2708691     DOI: 10.1121/1.397968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Adaptation to auditory motion in the horizontal plane: effect of prior exposure to motion on motion detectability.

Authors:  D W Grantham
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

2.  Neurons in cat primary auditory cortex sensitive to correlates of auditory motion in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  E Stumpf; J M Toronchuk; M S Cynader
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Auditory psychomotor coordination and visual search performance.

Authors:  D R Perrott; K Saberi; K Brown; T Z Strybel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-09

4.  Neural coding and perception of auditory motion direction based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Zuk; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Auditory motion tracking ability of adults with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Keng Moua; Alan Kan; Heath G Jones; Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Frequency-dependent integration of auditory and vestibular cues for self-motion perception.

Authors:  Corey S Shayman; Robert J Peterka; Frederick J Gallun; Yonghee Oh; Nai-Yuan N Chang; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Restoration of spatial hearing in adult cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Keng Moua; Shelly Godar; Alan Kan; Sara M Misurelli; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Distortions of perceived auditory and visual space following adaptation to motion.

Authors:  Ross W Deas; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of virtual speaker density and room reverberation on spatiotemporal thresholds of audio-visual motion coherence.

Authors:  Narayan Sankaran; Johahn Leung; Simon Carlile
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Discrimination contours for moving sounds reveal duration and distance cues dominate auditory speed perception.

Authors:  Tom C A Freeman; Johahn Leung; Ella Wufong; Emily Orchard-Mills; Simon Carlile; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.