Literature DB >> 18725436

Effect of electrical current on the activities of antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.

Jose L del Pozo1, Mark S Rouse, Jayawant N Mandrekar, Marta Fernandez Sampedro, James M Steckelberg, Robin Patel.   

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms are resistant to conventional antimicrobial agents. Prior in vitro studies have shown that electrical current (EC) enhances the activities of aminoglycosides, quinolones, and oxytetracycline against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, and Streptococcus gordonii. This phenomenon, known as the bioelectric effect, has been only partially defined. The purpose of this work was to study the in vitro bioelectric effect on the activities of 11 antimicrobial agents representing a variety of different classes against P. aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and S. epidermidis. An eight-channel current generator/controller and eight chambers delivering a continuous flow of fresh medium with or without antimicrobial agents and/or EC to biofilm-coated coupons were used. No significant decreases in the numbers of log(10) CFU/cm(2) were seen after exposure to antimicrobial agents alone, with the exception of a 4.57-log-unit reduction for S. epidermidis and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. We detected a statistically significant bioelectric effect when vancomycin plus 2,000 microamperes EC were used against MRSA biofilms (P = 0.04) and when daptomycin and erythromycin were used in combination with 200 or 2,000 microamperes EC against S. epidermidis biofilms (P = 0.02 and 0.0004, respectively). The results of these experiments indicate that the enhancement of the activity of antimicrobial agents against biofilm organisms by EC is not a generalizable phenomenon across microorganisms and antimicrobial agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18725436      PMCID: PMC2612137          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00237-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  20 in total

Review 1.  Riddle of biofilm resistance.

Authors:  K Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Electrical enhancement of Streptococcus gordonii biofilm killing by gentamicin.

Authors:  W Wattanakaroon; P S Stewart
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.633

Review 3.  Membrane electrostatics.

Authors:  G Cevc
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1990-10-08

Review 4.  Testing the susceptibility of bacteria in biofilms to antibacterial agents.

Authors:  H Anwar; M K Dasgupta; J W Costerton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Treatment of nonunion with constant direct current.

Authors:  C T Brighton; Z B Friedenberg; E I Mitchell; R E Booth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.

Authors:  J W Costerton; K J Cheng; G G Geesey; T I Ladd; J C Nickel; M Dasgupta; T J Marrie
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 15.500

7.  Inhibition of SA-1 tumor growth in mice by human leukocyte interferon alpha combined with low-level direct current.

Authors:  G Sersa; D Miklavcic
Journal:  Mol Biother       Date:  1990-09

8.  Role of nutrient limitation and stationary-phase existence in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  Jeff N Anderl; Jeff Zahller; Frank Roe; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Electromagnetic augmentation of antibiotic efficacy in infection of orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  S A W Pickering; R Bayston; B E Scammell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-05

10.  Oxygen limitation contributes to antibiotic tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms.

Authors:  Giorgia Borriello; Erin Werner; Frank Roe; Aana M Kim; Garth D Ehrlich; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Novel approaches to the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of medical device-associated infections.

Authors:  Paschalis Vergidis; Robin Patel
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.982

2.  Increased temperature enhances the antimicrobial effects of daptomycin, vancomycin, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and cefamandole on staphylococcal biofilms.

Authors:  Stefan Hajdu; Johannes Holinka; Sonja Reichmann; Alexander M Hirschl; Wolfgang Graninger; Elisabeth Presterl
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Bacterial Inhibition by Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Asadi; Giti Torkaman
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Cathodic Electrical Stimulation Combined With Vancomycin Enhances Treatment of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Implant-associated Infections.

Authors:  Scott Nodzo; Menachem Tobias; Lisa Hansen; Nicole R Luke-Marshall; Ross Cole; Linda Wild; Anthony A Campagnari; Mark T Ehrensberger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Capacitive coupling reduces instrumentation-related infection in rabbit spines: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mohit Gilotra; Cullen Griffith; Jason Schiavone; Naren Nimmagadda; Jenna Noveau; Steven C Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Microampere Electric Current Causes Bacterial Membrane Damage and Two-Way Leakage in a Short Period of Time.

Authors:  Venkata Rao Krishnamurthi; Ariel Rogers; Janet Peifer; Isabelle I Niyonshuti; Jingyi Chen; Yong Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Antibiofilm Activity of Electrical Current in a Catheter Model.

Authors:  Paul Voegele; Jon Badiola; Suzannah M Schmidt-Malan; Melissa J Karau; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The electricidal effect: reduction of Staphylococcus and pseudomonas biofilms by prolonged exposure to low-intensity electrical current.

Authors:  Jose L del Pozo; Mark S Rouse; Jayawant N Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Prevention of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation using electrical current.

Authors:  Jose L Del Pozo; Mark S Rouse; Gorane Euba; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Jayawant N Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Appl Biomater Funct Mater       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.604

Review 10.  Electrochemical biofilm control: a review.

Authors:  Sujala T Sultana; Jerome T Babauta; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.