Literature DB >> 12654654

Role of nutrient limitation and stationary-phase existence in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin.

Jeff N Anderl1, Jeff Zahller, Frank Roe, Philip S Stewart.   

Abstract

Biofilms formed by Klebsiella pneumoniae resisted killing during prolonged exposure to ampicillin or ciprofloxacin even though these agents have been shown to penetrate bacterial aggregates. Bacteria dispersed from biofilms into medium quickly regained most of their susceptibility. Experiments with free-floating bacteria showed that stationary-phase bacteria were protected from killing by either antibiotic, especially when the test was performed in medium lacking carbon and nitrogen sources. These results suggested that the antibiotic tolerance of biofilm bacteria could be explained by nutrient limitation in the biofilm leading to stationary-phase existence of at least some of the cells in the biofilm. This mechanism was supported by experimental characterization of nutrient availability and growth status in biofilms. The average specific growth rate of bacteria in biofilms was only 0.032 h(-1) compared to the specific growth rate of planktonic bacteria of 0.59 h(-1) measured in the same medium. Glucose did not penetrate all the way through the biofilm, and oxygen was shown to penetrate only into the upper 100 micro m. The specific catalase activity was elevated in biofilm bacteria to a level similar to that of stationary-phase planktonic cells. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that bacteria were affected by ampicillin near the periphery of the biofilm but were not affected in the interior. Taken together, these results indicate that K. pneumoniae in this system experience nutrient limitation locally within the biofilm, leading to zones in which the bacteria enter stationary phase and are growing slowly or not at all. In these inactive regions, bacteria are less susceptible to killing by antibiotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12654654      PMCID: PMC152508          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1251-1256.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  20 in total

Review 1.  Riddle of biofilm resistance.

Authors:  K Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  Karen D Xu; Gordon A McFeters; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 3.  Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms.

Authors:  P S Stewart; J W Costerton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Transmission electron microscopic study of antibiotic action on Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm.

Authors:  Jeff Zahller; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria.

Authors:  B Herigstad; M Hamilton; J Heersink
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 7.  Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  T F Mah; G A O'Toole
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.079

8.  The rate of killing of Escherichia coli by beta-lactam antibiotics is strictly proportional to the rate of bacterial growth.

Authors:  E Tuomanen; R Cozens; W Tosch; O Zak; A Tomasz
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1986-05

9.  Amorphous ferrous sulfide as a reducing agent for culture of anaerobes.

Authors:  T D Brock; K Od'ea
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Evaluation of the in vitro bactericidal action of ciprofloxacin on cells of Escherichia coli in the logarithmic and stationary phases of growth.

Authors:  H J Zeiler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  104 in total

1.  The MerR-like transcriptional regulator BrlR contributes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm tolerance.

Authors:  Julie Liao; Karin Sauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  The development of ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa involves multiple response stages and multiple proteins.

Authors:  Hsun-Cheng Su; Kevin Ramkissoon; Janet Doolittle; Martha Clark; Jainab Khatun; Ashley Secrest; Matthew C Wolfgang; Morgan C Giddings
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Biofilm formation by the human pathogen Neisseria meningitidis.

Authors:  Martin Lappann; Ulrich Vogel
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Contribution of stress responses to antibiotic tolerance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart; Michael J Franklin; Kerry S Williamson; James P Folsom; Laura Boegli; Garth A James
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Role of biofilms in neurosurgical device-related infections.

Authors:  Ernest E Braxton; Garth D Ehrlich; Luanne Hall-Stoodley; Paul Stoodley; Rick Veeh; Christoph Fux; Fen Z Hu; Matthew Quigley; J Christopher Post
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Spatial patterns of DNA replication, protein synthesis, and oxygen concentration within bacterial biofilms reveal diverse physiological states.

Authors:  Suriani Abdul Rani; Betsey Pitts; Haluk Beyenal; Raaja Angathevar Veluchamy; Zbigniew Lewandowski; William M Davison; Kelli Buckingham-Meyer; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  A three-dimensional computer model of four hypothetical mechanisms protecting biofilms from antimicrobials.

Authors:  Jason D Chambless; Stephen M Hunt; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Signals, regulatory networks, and materials that build and break bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Ece Karatan; Paula Watnick
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 9.  Bacterial persistence: some new insights into an old phenomenon.

Authors:  R Jayaraman
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 10.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in disease.

Authors:  Lawrence R Mulcahy; Vincent M Isabella; Kim Lewis
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.