Literature DB >> 22215478

Capacitive coupling reduces instrumentation-related infection in rabbit spines: a pilot study.

Mohit Gilotra1, Cullen Griffith, Jason Schiavone, Naren Nimmagadda, Jenna Noveau, Steven C Ludwig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative spine infections cause considerable morbidity. Patients are subjected to long-term antibiotic regimens and may require further surgery. Delivery of electric current through instrumentation can detach biofilm, allowing better antibiotic penetration and assisting in eradicating infection. QUESTION/PURPOSES: We asked (1) whether capacitive coupling treatment in combination with a single dose of antibiotics would reduce infection rates when compared with antibiotics alone in a rabbit spine infection model, (2) whether it would decrease the overall bacterial burden, and (3) whether there was a time-dependent response based on days treated with capacitive coupling.
METHODS: Thirty rabbits were subjected to a well-established spine infection model with a single dose of intravenously administered systemic ceftriaxone (20 mg/kg of body weight) prophylaxis. Two noncontiguous rods were implanted inside dead space defects at L3 and L6 challenged with 10(6) colony-forming units of Staphylococcus aureus. Rabbits were randomly treated with a capacitive coupling or control device. Instrumentation and soft tissue bacterial growth were assessed after 7 days.
RESULTS: Sites treated with capacitive coupling showed a decrease in the incidence of positive culture: 36% versus 81% in the control group. We observed no difference in the soft tissue's infectious burden. Overall bacterial load was not decreased with capacitive coupling.
CONCLUSIONS: Capacitive coupling in conjunction with antibiotics reduced the instrumentation-related infection rate compared with antibiotics alone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Capacitive coupling noninvasively delivers an alternating current that may detach biofilm from instrumentation. Treatment of infection may be successful without removal of instrumentation, allowing for improved stability and overall decreased morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22215478      PMCID: PMC3348327          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2231-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial-drug resistance.

Authors:  H S Gold; R C Moellering
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-11-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion and device-related stress shielding.

Authors:  M Ito; L A Fay; Y Ito; M R Yuan; W T Edwards; H A Yuan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Management of postoperative infections after spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  A D Levi; C A Dickman; V K Sonntag
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  A prospective, double-blind trial of electrical capacitive coupling in the treatment of non-union of long bones.

Authors:  G Scott; J B King
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A double-blind study of capacitively coupled electrical stimulation as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusions.

Authors:  C B Goodwin; C T Brighton; R D Guyer; J R Johnson; K I Light; H A Yuan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Use of electromagnetic fields in a spinal fusion. A rabbit model.

Authors:  P A Glazer; M R Heilmann; J C Lotz; D S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Use of capacitive coupled electric fields in stress fractures in athletes.

Authors:  F Benazzo; M Mosconi; G Beccarisi; U Galli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Results of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) in ununited fractures after external skeletal fixation.

Authors:  M Marcer; G Musatti; C A Bassett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Cost of medical care for postoperative spinal infections.

Authors:  R R Calderone; D E Garland; D A Capen; H Oster
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Electromagnetic augmentation of antibiotic efficacy in infection of orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  S A W Pickering; R Bayston; B E Scammell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-05
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Cathodic Voltage-controlled Electrical Stimulation Plus Prolonged Vancomycin Reduce Bacterial Burden of a Titanium Implant-associated Infection in a Rodent Model.

Authors:  Scott R Nodzo; Menachem Tobias; Richard Ahn; Lisa Hansen; Nicole R Luke-Marshall; Craig Howard; Linda Wild; Anthony A Campagnari; Mark T Ehrensberger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.176

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.