Literature DB >> 18723109

Use of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivity.

Klaus Rohrschneider1, Stefan Bültmann, Christina Springer.   

Abstract

The advances in retinal imaging technologies have led to enormous innovation towards diagnostic in current ophthalmology, enabling the practitioner to detect early retinal changes and to document treatment effects. While, in the past, retinoscopy, visual acuity testing and perimetry played the major role in functional diagnostics, today, laser-based systems like laser scanning imaging systems especially for fluorescein-angiography, optical coherence tomography, electrodiagnostic systems and the analysis of retinal vessels may be used as well. However, the challenge to correlate subjective alterations or clinical changes with visual function, still remains. Micro- or fundus perimetry offers the option to test retinal sensitivity while directly observing the fundus. In this paper, we review the literature encompassing the results of more than 25 years of fundus perimetry, i.e. perimetry under simultaneous visualization of the fundus. During this time, results on known diseases and reproducibility of the technique were published, but a lot of work was also performed on the combination of different examination methods, allowing a synopsis of long-term results and new approaches by combining different methods and improving each of them. The first part of this review attends to improvements of the method. The second part addresses the clinical and diagnostic values. The final part is dedicated to diagnostic and long-term observation of fundus perimetric results beginning with common and rare diseases like age-related macular degeneration, macular holes and diabetic retinopathy, various types of macular dystrophies ending with challenges in conventional perimetry like glaucoma and malingering. Due to the experience and progress in the field of fundus perimetry and retinal imaging, the method has long passed its role of observing and has all the potential for prediction, early detection and treatment-monitoring of macular diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18723109     DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res        ISSN: 1350-9462            Impact factor:   21.198


  62 in total

1.  Changes in retinal sensitivity in geographic atrophy progression as measured by microperimetry.

Authors:  Annal D Meleth; Pradeep Mettu; Elvira Agrón; Emily Y Chew; Srinivas R Sadda; Frederick L Ferris; Wai T Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Use of microperimetry to compare macular light sensitivity in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Ping Huang; Yan Shi; Xin Wang; Samuel Shao-Min Zhang; Chun Zhang
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  [Fundus perimetry in functional diagnostics of glaucoma. Applicable in the practice?].

Authors:  K Rohrschneider; P C Issa; C Springer; A F Scheuerle
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  The effect of pre-adapting light intensity on dark adaptation in early age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Allannah J Gaffney; Alison M Binns; Tom H Margrain
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Fundus-controlled two-color dark adaptometry with the Microperimeter MP1.

Authors:  Wadim Bowl; Knut Stieger; Birgit Lorenz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  [Development and validation of novel clinical endpoints in intermediate age-related macular degeneration in MACUSTAR].

Authors:  Jan H Terheyden; Robert P Finger; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Hansjürgen Agostini; Claudia Dahlke; Laura Kuehlewein; Gabriele E Lang; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Armin Wolf; Michael K Boettger; Ulrich F O Luhmann; Friedrich Asmus; Frank G Holz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Two-photon microperimetry with picosecond pulses.

Authors:  Marcin J Marzejon; Łukasz Kornaszewski; Jakub Bogusławski; Piotr Ciąćka; Miłosz Martynow; Grażyna Palczewska; Sebastian Maćkowski; Krzysztof Palczewski; Maciej Wojtkowski; Katarzyna Komar
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  MICROPERIMETRY AS A SCREENING TEST FOR HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE RETINOPATHY: The Hard-Risk-1 Study.

Authors:  Mustafa Iftikhar; Ramandeep Kaur; April Nefalar; Bushra Usmani; Saleema Kherani; Isra Rashid; Etienne Schönbach; Michelle Petri; Hendrik P N Scholl; Syed M Shah
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Comparison between MP-1 and Humphrey visual field defects in glaucoma and retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; R Theodore Smith; Jonathan P Greenberg; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 10.  Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities, differences, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 1.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.