Literature DB >> 24093180

Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities, differences, and clinical applications.

Jennifer H Acton1, Vivienne C Greenstein.   

Abstract

Fundus-driven perimetry, commonly known as microperimetry, is a technique for measuring visual field sensitivity, whilst simultaneously viewing the fundus. In this article, we review the technique, focusing on the MP-1 microperimeter (Nidek Instruments, Inc, Padua, Italy); we compare it with conventional static automated perimetry, emphasizing the importance of understanding the effects of the different stimulus conditions and data analyses on the interpretation of microperimetry data. The clinical applications of the technique, in the evaluation of functional and structural changes that accompany retinal diseases, are illustrated by its use in patients with age-related macular degeneration, Stargardt disease, and retinitis pigmentosa. In addition, the advantages and limitations of the technique are summarized.
© 2013 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24093180      PMCID: PMC3792399          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   1.882


  41 in total

1.  Nidek MP1 is able to detect subtle decline in function in inherited and age-related atrophic macular disease with stable visual acuity.

Authors:  Fred K Chen; Praveen J Patel; Andrew R Webster; Peter J Coffey; Adnan Tufail; Lyndon Da Cruz
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry.

Authors:  Klaus Rohrschneider; Christina Springer; Stefan Bültmann; Hans E Völcker
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.

Authors:  Christina Springer; Stefan Bültmann; Hans E Völcker; Klaus Rohrschneider
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  Into the twilight zone: the complexities of mesopic vision and luminous efficiency.

Authors:  Andrew Stockman; Lindsay T Sharpe
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Macular function in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration with or without contralateral late age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Vincenzo Parisi; Loredana Perillo; Massimiliano Tedeschi; Cecilia Scassa; Geltrude Gallinaro; Nicoletta Capaldo; Monica Varano
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Synaptic pathology, altered gene expression, and degeneration in photoreceptors impacted by drusen.

Authors:  Patrick T Johnson; Meghan N Brown; Bryce C Pulliam; Don H Anderson; Lincoln V Johnson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA.

Authors:  B Bengtsson; J Olsson; A Heijl; H Rootzén
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  1997-08

8.  Static fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope with an automated threshold strategy.

Authors:  K Rohrschneider; T Fendrich; M Becker; H Krastel; F E Kruse; H E Völcker
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Models of the normal and abnormal rod system.

Authors:  D C Hood; V Greenstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Abnormal fundus autofluorescence in relation to retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Petra Popović; Martina Jarc-Vidmar; Marko Hawlina
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Clinical spectrum, genetic complexity and therapeutic approaches for retinal disease caused by ABCA4 mutations.

Authors:  Frans P M Cremers; Winston Lee; Rob W J Collin; Rando Allikmets
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Correlation of structure and function of the macula in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R Battu; A Khanna; B Hegde; T T J M Berendschot; S Grover; J S A G Schouten
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Retinoblastoma and vision.

Authors:  Omar Warda; Zishan Naeem; Kelsey A Roelofs; Mandeep S Sagoo; M Ashwin Reddy
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Understanding the role of microperimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  Luca Scuderi; Irene Gattazzo; Alessandro de Paula; Clemente Maria Iodice; Federico Di Tizio; Andrea Perdicchi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.029

Review 5.  Microperimetry for geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Karl G Csaky; Praveen J Patel; Yasir J Sepah; David G Birch; Diana V Do; Michael S Ip; Robyn H Guymer; Chi D Luu; Shamika Gune; Hugh Lin; Daniela Ferrara
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Test-Retest Reproducibility of the Microperimeter MP3 With Fundus Image Tracking in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Macular Disease.

Authors:  Stefan Palkovits; Nino Hirnschall; Stefan Georgiev; Christoph Leisser; Oliver Findl
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 7.  Potential Utility of Retinal Imaging for Alzheimer's Disease: A Review.

Authors:  Huan Liao; Zhuoting Zhu; Ying Peng
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Pathogenic mechanisms and the prospect of gene therapy for choroideremia.

Authors:  Ioannis S Dimopoulos; Stephanie Chan; Robert E MacLaren; Ian M MacDonald
Journal:  Expert Opin Orphan Drugs       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 0.694

9.  Selective Automated Perimetry Under Photopic, Mesopic, and Scotopic Conditions: Detection Mechanisms and Testing Strategies.

Authors:  Matthew P Simunovic; Anthony T Moore; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Management of diplopia with visual-field defects.

Authors:  Ling-Yuh Kao; Chun-Hsiu Liu; Meng-Ling Yang
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.