Literature DB >> 18718307

Human ocular following: evidence that responses to large-field stimuli are limited by local and global inhibitory influences.

B M Sheliga1, E J FitzGibbon, F A Miles.   

Abstract

Large-field visual motion elicits tracking eye movements at ultra-short latency, often termed ocular following responses (OFRs). We recorded the initial OFRs of three human subjects when vertical sine-wave gratings were subject to horizontal motion in the form of successive 1/4-wavelength steps. The gratings could occupy the full screen (45 degrees wide, 30 degrees high) or a number of horizontal strips, each 1 degrees high and extending the full width of the display. These strips were always equally spaced vertically. In a first experiment, the gratings always had a contrast of 32%. Increasing the number of strips could reduce the response latency by up to 20 ms, so the magnitude of the initial OFRs was estimated from the change in eye position over the initial open-loop period measured with respect to response onset. A single (centred) strip (covering 3.3% of the screen) always elicited robust OFRs, and three strips (10% coverage) were sufficient to elicit the maximum OFR. Increasing the number of strips to 15 (50% coverage) had little impact, i.e., responses had asymptoted, and further increasing the coverage to 100% (full screen image) actually decreased the OFR so that it was now less than that elicited with only one strip. In a second experiment, the contrast of the gratings could be fixed at one of the four levels ranging from 8% to 64%, and the OFR showed essentially the same pattern of dependence on screen coverage except that the lower the contrast, the lower the level at which the response asymptoted. This indicated that the asymptote was not due simply to some upper limit on the magnitude of the eye movement or the underlying motion signals. We postulate that this asymptote is the result of normalization due to global divisive inhibition, which has often been described in visual-motion-selective neurons in the cortex. We further suggest that the decrease in the OFR when the image filled the screen was due to the increased continuity of the gratings which we postulate would favour the local inhibitory surround mechanisms over the central excitatory ones. This study indicates that robust OFRs can be elicited by much smaller motion stimuli than is commonly supposed and that introducing spatial discontinuities can increase the efficacy of the motion stimuli even while decreasing the area stimulated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18718307      PMCID: PMC2562005          DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00633-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  23 in total

1.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of MT neurons.

Authors:  K H Britten; H W Heuer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Precise recording of human eye movements.

Authors:  H Collewijn; F van der Mark; T C Jansen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Contrast dependence of response normalization in area MT of the rhesus macaque.

Authors:  Hilary W Heuer; Kenneth H Britten
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Parallel motion processing for the initiation of short-latency ocular following in humans.

Authors:  Guillaume S Masson; Eric Castet
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Short-latency disparity-vergence eye movements in humans: sensitivity to simulated orthogonal tropias.

Authors:  D-S Yang; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD.

Authors:  D A ROBINSON
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  The vergence eye movements induced by radial optic flow: some fundamental properties of the underlying local-motion detectors.

Authors:  Y Kodaka; B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J R Bergen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Model of human visual-motion sensing.

Authors:  A B Watson; A J Ahumada
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Behavioral receptive field for ocular following in humans: dynamics of spatial summation and center-surround interactions.

Authors:  Frédéric V Barthélemy; Ivo Vanzetta; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  14 in total

1.  Inferring the future target trajectory from visual context: is visual background structure used for anticipatory smooth pursuit?

Authors:  Thomas Eggert; J Ladda; A Straube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of vergence on human ocular following response (OFR).

Authors:  Anand C Joshi; Matthew J Thurtell; Mark F Walker; Alessandro Serra; R John Leigh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Spatial summation properties of the human ocular following response (OFR): evidence for nonlinearities due to local and global inhibitory interactions.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The initial disparity vergence elicited with single and dual grating stimuli in monkeys: evidence for disparity energy sensing and nonlinear interactions.

Authors:  K Miura; Y Sugita; K Matsuura; N Inaba; K Kawano; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Retinal visual processing constrains human ocular following response.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; E J FitzGibbon; B G Cumming
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Spatial summation properties of the human ocular following response (OFR): dependence upon the spatial frequency of the stimulus.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; B G Cumming; E J Fitzgibbon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Spatiotemporal Filter for Visual Motion Integration from Pursuit Eye Movements in Humans and Monkeys.

Authors:  Trishna Mukherjee; Bing Liu; Claudio Simoncini; Leslie C Osborne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Ocular following in humans: spatial properties.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Boris M Sheliga; Edmond J Fitzgibbon; Lance M Optican
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Selective defects of visual tracking in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP): implications for mechanisms of motion vision.

Authors:  Anand C Joshi; David E Riley; Michael J Mustari; Mark L Cohen; R John Leigh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The initial torsional Ocular Following Response (tOFR) in humans: a response to the total motion energy in the stimulus?

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.