Literature DB >> 22326273

Exo1 plays a major role in DNA end resection in humans and influences double-strand break repair and damage signaling decisions.

Nozomi Tomimatsu1, Bipasha Mukherjee, Katherine Deland, Akihiro Kurimasa, Emma Bolderson, Kum Kum Khanna, Sandeep Burma.   

Abstract

The resection of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to generate ssDNA tails is a pivotal event in the cellular response to these breaks. In the two-step model of resection, primarily elucidated in yeast, initial resection by Mre11-CtIP is followed by extensive resection by two distinct pathways involving Exo1 or BLM/WRN-Dna2. However, resection pathways and their exact contributions in humans in vivo are not as clearly worked out as in yeast. Here, we examined the contribution of Exo1 to DNA end resection in humans in vivo in response to ionizing radiation (IR) and its relationship with other resection pathways (Mre11-CtIP or BLM/WRN). We find that Exo1 plays a predominant role in resection in human cells along with an alternate pathway dependent on WRN. While Mre11 and CtIP stimulate resection in human cells, they are not absolutely required for this process and Exo1 can function in resection even in the absence of Mre11-CtIP. Interestingly, the recruitment of Exo1 to DNA breaks appears to be inhibited by the NHEJ protein Ku80, and the higher level of resection that occurs upon siRNA-mediated depletion of Ku80 is dependent on Exo1. In addition, Exo1 may be regulated by 53BP1 and Brca1, and the restoration of resection in BRCA1-deficient cells upon depletion of 53BP1 is dependent on Exo1. Finally, we find that Exo1-mediated resection facilitates a transition from ATM- to ATR-mediated cell cycle checkpoint signaling. Our results identify Exo1 as a key mediator of DNA end resection and DSB repair and damage signaling decisions in human cells.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22326273      PMCID: PMC3319278          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  51 in total

1.  Nbs1 is required for ATR-dependent phosphorylation events.

Authors:  Tom Stiff; Caroline Reis; Gemma K Alderton; Lisa Woodbine; Mark O'Driscoll; Penny A Jeggo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Ali Jazayeri; Jacob Falck; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek; Graeme C M Smith; Jiri Lukas; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2005-12-04       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection.

Authors:  Alessandro A Sartori; Claudia Lukas; Julia Coates; Martin Mistrik; Shuang Fu; Jiri Bartek; Richard Baer; Jiri Lukas; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Ctp1 is a cell-cycle-regulated protein that functions with Mre11 complex to control double-strand break repair by homologous recombination.

Authors:  Oliver Limbo; Charly Chahwan; Yoshiki Yamada; Robertus A M de Bruin; Curt Wittenberg; Paul Russell
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends.

Authors:  Zhu Zhu; Woo-Hyun Chung; Eun Yong Shim; Sang Eun Lee; Grzegorz Ira
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Characterization of a breast cancer cell line derived from a germ-line BRCA1 mutation carrier.

Authors:  G E Tomlinson; T T Chen; V A Stastny; A K Virmani; M A Spillman; V Tonk; J L Blum; N R Schneider; I I Wistuba; J W Shay; J D Minna; A F Gazdar
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Ku recruits XLF to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Ken-ichi Yano; Keiko Morotomi-Yano; Shih-Ya Wang; Naoya Uematsu; Kyung-Jong Lee; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Eric Weterings; David J Chen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Pablo Huertas; Felipe Cortés-Ledesma; Alessandro A Sartori; Andrés Aguilera; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks.

Authors:  Simon Bekker-Jensen; Claudia Lukas; Risa Kitagawa; Fredrik Melander; Michael B Kastan; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Autophosphorylation of DNA-PKCS regulates its dynamics at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Naoya Uematsu; Eric Weterings; Ken-ichi Yano; Keiko Morotomi-Yano; Burkhard Jakob; Gisela Taucher-Scholz; Pierre-Olivier Mari; Dik C van Gent; Benjamin P C Chen; David J Chen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  84 in total

Review 1.  DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases.

Authors:  Alexandre Maréchal; Lee Zou
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  The tail that wags the dog: p12, the smallest subunit of DNA polymerase δ, is degraded by ubiquitin ligases in response to DNA damage and during cell cycle progression.

Authors:  Marietta Y W T Lee; Sufang Zhang; Szu Hua Sharon Lin; Xiaoxiao Wang; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Zhongtao Zhang; Ernest Y C Lee
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  The MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 Complex Conducts the Orchestration of Damage Signaling and Outcomes to Stress in DNA Replication and Repair.

Authors:  Aleem Syed; John A Tainer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 23.643

4.  DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint defects in a mouse model of 'BRCAness' are partially rescued by 53BP1 deletion.

Authors:  Sarah M Misenko; Dharm S Patel; Joonyoung Her; Samuel F Bunting
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  NF-κB-dependent DNA damage-signaling differentially regulates DNA double-strand break repair mechanisms in immature and mature human hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  D Kraft; M Rall; M Volcic; E Metzler; A Groo; A Stahl; L Bauer; E Nasonova; D Salles; G Taucher-Scholz; H Bönig; C Fournier; L Wiesmüller
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  RPA Phosphorylation Inhibits DNA Resection.

Authors:  Michael M Soniat; Logan R Myler; Hung-Che Kuo; Tanya T Paull; Ilya J Finkelstein
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  DNA end resection is needed for the repair of complex lesions in G1-phase human cells.

Authors:  Nicole B Averbeck; Oliver Ringel; Maren Herrlitz; Burkhard Jakob; Marco Durante; Gisela Taucher-Scholz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Distinct functions of human RECQ helicases WRN and BLM in replication fork recovery and progression after hydroxyurea-induced stalling.

Authors:  Julia M Sidorova; Keffy Kehrli; Frances Mao; Raymond Monnat
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-12-17

9.  Rad52 Restrains Resection at DNA Double-Strand Break Ends in Yeast.

Authors:  Zhenxin Yan; Chaoyou Xue; Sandeep Kumar; J Brooks Crickard; Yang Yu; Weibin Wang; Nhung Pham; Yuxi Li; Hengyao Niu; Patrick Sung; Eric C Greene; Grzegorz Ira
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Exonuclease 1 (Exo1) is required for activating response to S(N)1 DNA methylating agents.

Authors:  Eugene Izumchenko; John Saydi; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.